Optics Express投稿求助
投Optics Express,兩個審稿人,意見如下:
Reviewer1: Overall a good paper that's unfortunately not giving any experimental results, but I still recommend publishing it as steeping stone for some cool applications perhaps. The writing quality can be improved by following some revision suggestions listed above. I recommend publishing it after revisions.
Reviewer2:Although this work presents technically sound results, the Authors should explicitly discuss what the practical applications of this theoretical study are and they should stress the advancements of their work concerning what is already present in literature.
編輯:We regret to advise you that your manuscript has not been accepted for publication in Optics Express. The reviewer comments are included below. The Journal’s editorial board discourages resubmission of inadequately revised rejected manuscripts. Such papers may be rejected without being sent again for peer review unless the authors can show that the resubmitted paper differs significantly from the original one.
請問這種修改后重投還有希望嗎?謝謝!
返回小木蟲查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號
按要求認真修改后,如果送審,機會比較大
茨愕穆畚暮貌緩酶牧耍酶目梢猿⑹韻灤薷腦僂,染J緩酶,建覚┍接选一个茰O鈉誑?/p>