重復率過高被拒，修改后還有必要再投此期刊嗎
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Food Hydrocolloids. Unfortunately, after reviewing your paper I discovered that your submission shows Similarity scores of 28%. In this case, the overlap goes beyond the normal occurrence of standard phrases in your field. There are many sections which seem to be unoriginal, having appeared mostly in the following previously published work:
Food Packaging and Shelf Life.Volume 22, December 2019, 100413
Food Hydrocolloids.Volume 75, February 2018, Pages 13-21
Your paper contains a significant amount of textual and findings overlap with the mentioned previously published works. Moreover, this prior work has not been cited in your submission. For this reason your paper cannot be considered for publication.
It is the policy of Food Hydrocolloids to publish new and original work. Text copied from copyrighted works from third parties, even in an introduction, should never be used without clearly identifying the other source (either by quotations or indentations). Every paper should present some novelty and new results in the form of a unique paper written in an author's own words.
求大佬們幫我分析一下編輯的回復，我還有必要修改降重后，再投此期刊嗎？感覺編輯的回復不是很友好，開始沒注意重復率這個問題
返回小木蟲查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號
重復率這個問題現(xiàn)在越來越嚴格了，他提到的這兩篇你重復了不少，怎么會沒引用呢，如果這個期刊還可以的話，你按照意見好好修改一下，自己先查一下重，可以繼續(xù)投
“感覺編輯的回復不是很友好”但我沒有這種感覺，編輯只是實事求是而已。我和一位蟲友合作寫的綜述，查重沒過關(guān)，被拒。我們降重后，大修，前不久已經(jīng)接收。
我感覺主編只是陳述了事實，而且給你指出具體的文章，可以大修，盡量不要和這兩篇文章過多重復，沒有說拒絕重投，如果修改好了，個人感覺可以繼續(xù)投稿的
降低重復率，再投沒問題的。
按照審稿意見好好改妥后可以繼續(xù)投的。需要注意的是一要降低重復率，二要有創(chuàng)新性亮點。祝順利
請教一般重復率要多少才算合理呢，很多專業(yè)名詞有時候?qū)嵲跊]法改，尤其是跟自己的文章特別容易重復，因為自己寫的時候遣詞造句跟以前發(fā)表的論文雷同了都不知道
，
請教一下后面重復率降到多少呢