投稿后一個(gè)月被拒，編輯回復(fù)：
This to inform you that your manuscript was subjected to a peer referee for evaluation. As you will see from the enclosed comments, your manuscript, in its current form, was rejected for publication in our Journal. Refer especially to the Section Editor's file attached. As per our peer referee, the manuscript’s general impression is not corresponding to the journal's guidelines.
Hopefully, if you manage to rewrite the manuscript sufficiently, you are very welcome to submit it again as a new one.

兩個(gè)審稿人意見不一致，編輯回復(fù)如下，感覺態(tài)度比較友好，附了帶很多修改標(biāo)記的manuscript，這種情況修改回去有機(jī)會(huì)么？
Section Editor recommendation:
After receiving two extremely different reviews, I had to study this manuscript carefully.
Unfortunately, I must agree with reviewer 1. In this form, the manuscript is not ready for publication in xx Moreover, the number of issues and shortcomings present in the study is causing the need to thoroughly rewrite the article if the authors want to publish it in xx
The main issues are:
- weak English
- inappropriate usage of references
- the unsuitable level of introduction and discussion paragraphs
All of my comments are in the attached file.
Nevertheless, the presented technique is fascinating, so I am waiting impatiently for the new manuscript. 返回小木蟲查看更多