論文審稿意見回來了，一共5個審稿人，意見如下：
Reviewer #1:（修改）
The topic is interesting and of current application in several industrial environments. The References are mostly recent but give credits to previous and remarkable works in this field.
The results show good agreement with numerical models and also improvements regarding previous models.
XXXXXbalabala...
Reviewer #2:（修改和加文獻(xiàn)）
This paper needs some revisions:
XXXXXbalabala...
Reviewer #3: 拒審
Reviewer #4: 拒稿
This paper ignores a great many works in XXX; it is a simplified method, only applicable to XXX. It cannot be accepted for the journal publication.
Reviewer #5:錄用
The work is novel and will have some useful impact. The article is well written and presented. It is therefore recommended for publication.

想請教一下各位前輩大佬，這種情況錄用機(jī)會大么？另外這個拒稿的意見怎么回復(fù)呢 返回小木蟲查看更多