5個(gè)審稿人1個(gè)拒稿
論文審稿意見回來了，一共5個(gè)審稿人，意見如下：
Reviewer #1:（修改）
The topic is interesting and of current application in several industrial environments. The References are mostly recent but give credits to previous and remarkable works in this field.
The results show good agreement with numerical models and also improvements regarding previous models.
XXXXXbalabala...
Reviewer #2:（修改和加文獻(xiàn)）
This paper needs some revisions:
XXXXXbalabala...
Reviewer #3: 拒審
Reviewer #4: 拒稿
This paper ignores a great many works in XXX; it is a simplified method, only applicable to XXX. It cannot be accepted for the journal publication.
Reviewer #5:錄用
The work is novel and will have some useful impact. The article is well written and presented. It is therefore recommended for publication.
想請(qǐng)教一下各位前輩大佬，這種情況錄用機(jī)會(huì)大么？另外這個(gè)拒稿的意見怎么回復(fù)呢
返回小木蟲查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號(hào)
和我最近一篇類似。3大修2拒稿，最后重新提交后還是收了。
首先，接收和拒絕都有可能，絕對(duì)權(quán)在于編輯。
其次，如果編輯給的回復(fù)是修改，那么就是給了你機(jī)會(huì)好好修改。一定要一一回應(yīng)，好好解決評(píng)審給你的意見和建議，
問題不大，認(rèn)真修改！
好好回答還是有機(jī)會(huì)的，這種情況主編會(huì)找更多的審稿人來綜合評(píng)價(jià)，看錄和拒的票數(shù)
祝福
問題不大吧
感覺還蠻有希望的