收到SCI的審稿意見,但是真的不知道該怎么修改啊
1-The objective, methodology, and results should be better described, discussed and justified.
2- The current literature review is not sufficient and research gap is not clear.
3- The results should be expanded significantly and quantitatively.
4- I strongly suggest that authors shall carry out more studies to compare the results from this paper to that from other similar studies.
5- Add numerical results in the abstract.
6-Moreover, try to enhance the explanation of the paper equation by the physical point of view (not only the symbols and the units). Furthermore, provide references for the selected equations where it is possible.
收到SCI的審稿意見,但是真的不知道該怎么修改啊,特別是第一條,太泛了吧,感覺是不是想要拒
返回小木蟲查看更多
今日熱帖
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號
確實,難度不小
。
。
都是相對比較具體的意見,修改回復無太大難度,
。
加油!祝福!
。