| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3468 | 回復(fù): 5 | ||
[求助]
IEEE Trans. Smart Gid 一審意見 錄用幾率大嗎? 已有2人參與
|
|
After careful review we have determined that your paper might be of interest for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, after revisions, if those revisions fully and properly address the concerns of the reviewers. The comments from the reviewers appearing below may include specific revisions that are mandatory and other changes suggested. You may have to make broader changes if necessary based on general comments provided by the reviewers. I wish to emphasize that this is not a conditional acceptance. It is, rather, a recognition by our reviewers and editors that your paper merits some interest. The reviewers of the original draft will be approached to assess the revised manuscript; at the discretion of the editor, additional reviewers may be included. Please submit your revised paper within 60 days of receiving this letter. After 60 days the revision will expire and you will need to submit your manuscript as a new paper submission. We encourage you to include an explanation of how you responded to the comments by the reviewers to help expedite our review. Please include this explanation in the space provided for "response to reviewers" and "response to editor" when you upload the revision. Please note that you should submit your revised paper following the latest author's guidelines (We have had direct author upload since January 7, 2002). See the Author's Kit on: www.ieee.org/organizations/society/power/subpages/authors.html Also, directions are contained at the end of this email. WE ARE AUTOMATICALLY INFORMED WHEN YOU UPLOAD YOUR REVISION AND RESPONSES SO PLEASE DO NOT SEND EMAIL TO ME THAT YOU SUBMITTED YOUR PAPER, AND PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME YOUR PAPER AS EMAIL ATTACHMENT. Sincerely, Dr. Jianhui Wang Editor in Chief, Transactions on Smart Grid COMMENTS TO THE AUTHORS: Editor's Comments: Editor Comments to the Author: The reviewers raised concerns on the system models studied in the proposed research including the modelling details of the power electronics interface which has serious impact on the efficacy of the proposed method as claimed. The presentation is very poor and the paper needs re-writing in many places. Reviewer 1 提出了4條意見; Reviewer 2 提出了10條意見; Reviewer 3 提出了8條意見。 這個應(yīng)該算大修,請問這樣錄用的概率多大? I wish to emphasize that this is not a conditional acceptance.到底是什么意思?是說即便根據(jù)審稿人和主編的意見修改,文章也可能被拒嗎? |
木蟲之王 (文學(xué)泰斗)
peterflyer
| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +9 | 苑豆豆 2026-03-20 | 9/450 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 292求調(diào)劑 +4 | 鵝鵝鵝額額額額?/a> 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料292調(diào)劑 +8 | 橘頌思美人 2026-03-23 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿陜師大生物學(xué)071000,298分,求調(diào)劑 +3 | SYA! 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京理工大學(xué)085701資源與環(huán)境302分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 葵梓衛(wèi)隊(duì) 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
求調(diào)劑材料學(xué)碩080500,總分289分
5+3
|
@taotao 2026-03-19 | 21/1050 |
|
|
[考研]
|
酥酥魚.. 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +12 | 申子申申 2026-03-19 | 18/900 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | Auroracx 2026-03-22 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 廣西大學(xué)材料導(dǎo)師推薦 +3 | 夏夏夏小正 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +5 | yzysaa 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0805 316求調(diào)劑 +3 | 大雪深藏 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +12 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-19 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑0854 +3 | assdll 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085700資源與環(huán)境308求調(diào)劑 +12 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-18 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學(xué),080502,354分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 守候夕陽CF 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 阿姐阿姐家啊 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 +16 | 于海海海海 2026-03-19 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西安交通大學(xué) 學(xué)碩 354求調(diào)劑211或者雙一流 +3 | 我想要讀研究生 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研調(diào)劑 +3 | xwt。 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|