| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1770 | 回復(fù): 3 | ||
Moskyon木蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
關(guān)于HER的tafel測(cè)量問(wèn)題 已有1人參與
|
|
本人電化學(xué)小白,最近在析氫測(cè)試,對(duì)于tafel斜率會(huì)進(jìn)行擬合,但是對(duì)lsv的正負(fù)掃向問(wèn)題很疑惑。 我知道析氫測(cè)試的lsv極化曲線(xiàn)是進(jìn)行負(fù)掃,但看到有說(shuō)tafel的擬合需要通過(guò)lsv正掃計(jì)算,通過(guò)測(cè)試這兩者的擬合結(jié)果存在出入 負(fù)掃的tafel會(huì)更小一些。 那究竟正掃負(fù)掃哪個(gè)是正確的,為什么會(huì)存在出入呢,如果可以請(qǐng)幫我找到參考文獻(xiàn),謝謝大家了! @Gamry-電化學(xué) @langzhizhou @louderbe 發(fā)自小木蟲(chóng)Android客戶(hù)端 |
木蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
金蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
|
首先, 對(duì)電位的正負(fù)規(guī)定,歐洲和美國(guó)的科學(xué)家,尤其在電催化領(lǐng)域,有些不同,看下面的介紹: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El ... al#Sign_conventions Sign conventions Historically, two conventions for sign for the electrode potential have formed:[2] convention "Nernst–Lewis–Latimer" (sometimes referred to as "American" ,convention "Gibbs–Ostwald–Stockholm" (sometimes referred to as "European" .In 1953 in Stockholm[3] IUPAC recognized that either of the conventions is permissible; however, it unanimously recommended that only the magnitude expressed according to the convention (2) be called "the electrode potential". To avoid possible ambiguities, the electrode potential thus defined can also be referred to as Gibbs–Stockholm electrode potential. In both conventions, the standard hydrogen electrode is defined to have a potential of 0 V. Both conventions also agree on the sign of E for a half-cell reaction when it is written as a reduction. The main difference between the two conventions[4] is that upon reversing the direction of a half-cell reaction as written, according to convention (1) the sign of E also switches, whereas in convention (2) it does not. The logic behind switching the sign of E is to maintain the correct sign relationship with the Gibbs free energy change, given by ΔG = -nFE where n is the number of electrons involved and F is the Faraday constant. It is assumed that the half-reaction is balanced by the appropriate SHE half-reaction. Since ΔG switches sign when a reaction is written in reverse, so to, proponents of convention (1) argue, should the sign of E. Proponents of convention (2) argue that it is more convenient to consider oxidants and reductants on the same scale. (2) 把BARD的JACS一篇文章, 放上,看其中的一種說(shuō)法:析氫測(cè)試的lsv極化曲線(xiàn)是進(jìn)行負(fù)掃: First, the MoS2 substrate potential was swept from 0 V to − 0.7 V at a scan rate of 5 mV/s to generate hydrogen continuously, and the hydrogen was then collected at the Pt UME tip. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org ... 7029b2749dc3581.pdf 歡迎其他專(zhuān)家給出見(jiàn)解。 |
| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 張芳銘-中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)-環(huán)境工程專(zhuān)碩-298 +3 | 手機(jī)用戶(hù) 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海理工能源動(dòng)力(085800)310分求調(diào)劑 +3 | zhangmingc 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 266分求材料化工冶金礦業(yè)等專(zhuān)業(yè)的調(diào)劑 +4 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 化工專(zhuān)碩 338分 求調(diào)劑 +8 | 路癡小琪 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +10 | land xuxu 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 339求調(diào)劑 +4 | 烤麥芽 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +9 | 小蠟新筆 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[論文投稿] Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology +3 | Russ_ss 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 北京林業(yè)大學(xué)碩導(dǎo)招生廣告 +6 | kongweilin 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 336材料求調(diào)劑 +7 | 陳瀅瑩 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研]
|
平樂(lè)樂(lè)樂(lè) 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | 032500 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 機(jī)械學(xué)碩總分317求調(diào)劑。。! +4 | Acaciad 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 生物技術(shù)與工程 +3 | 1294608413 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求b區(qū)院校調(diào)劑 +4 | 周56 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉林大學(xué)材料與化工303分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 為學(xué)666 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[論文投稿] 急發(fā)核心期刊論文 +3 | 賢達(dá)問(wèn)津 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 276求調(diào)劑 +3 | YNRYG 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +6 | ytter 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|