| 查看: 3463 | 回復(fù): 13 | |||
chuzhaoxiang銀蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 投稿交流 已有8人參與
|
||
|
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 投稿交流 論文投稿2周后進(jìn)入外審,3個(gè)月后收到系統(tǒng)自動(dòng)發(fā)送的郵件說是外審已經(jīng)結(jié)束,進(jìn)入Ready for Decision狀態(tài),可現(xiàn)在這個(gè)狀態(tài)已經(jīng)持續(xù)49天了,想催又不敢催,怕悲劇了,所以請(qǐng)教一下各位,有類似投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)的交流一下。 |
新蟲 (小有名氣)
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
|
萬幸,投稿5個(gè)月左右返回一審意見,鄭院士給了一次寶貴的修改機(jī)會(huì),大家?guī)兔Ψ治鲆幌聦徃逡庖,給些修改建議吧 Comments from the editors and reviewers: -Reviewer 1 The manuscript addresses the issue of analytically predicting the effective thermal conductivity (ETC) of low porosity granular geomaterials. Haigh’s (2012) model for predicting the ETC based on spherical particle embedded in unit cylindrical cell is extended for lower void ratio (e<0.5) has been developed. The work sounds original and reads well. Clarification on electrical analogy for thermal conductivity is explained very well. The pictorial representation of thermal unit cell and derivation of the formulas are noteworthy. However, following points needs to be clarified before considered for publication. 1. For quasi-hemispherical particle enclosed in the cylindrical cell, the radius of the inscribed spherical particles are allowed to grow till sqrt(2R). This assumption control the alpha and beta controlling parameters. Parameter alpha control the porosity (phi) of the system. A proper explanation is required based on physical or geometrial sense for justification of this assumption. 2. The curvature of the menisci holding the water at the particle contact is ignored. This plays a significant role in ETC computation. This should be mentioned in the assumption. 3. Soil Water Characteristic Curve (SWCC) provides better justification for change in ETC of geomaterials which is not limited to sand type materials only. A metion of this similarity is provide in the review of Dong et al. Geotech. and Geolog.Eng. 33, 202-221,(2015). Likos has developed an analytical expression considering this effect. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 33, 179–192. A mention of this work is relevant for this manuscript. 4. Some of the references regarding the numerical thermal conductivity evaluation are relatively old and need to be updated, I suggested recent relevant references by Lee et. al Geothermics 67 76-85 (2017). -Reviewer 2 In this research, a cylindrical unit cell model for predicting the effective thermal conductivity of two-phase or three-phase low porosity granular geomaterials is proposed. As understood by the reviewer, the model is simple geometry discretization of the unit particle into three-phase and assigning an initial thermal conductivity for each phase to fit the experimental data given in the last section of the paper. So, there is not that much difference between this model and fitting curve models exist in the literature (Chen 2008, Lu et al 2007). The general standard is far below what is expected for this journal. The main points will be: 1. While talking about three-phase heat transfer, considering only the conduction heat transfer is not valid. 2. Why consider only low porosity, in the literature, exists also models for low porosity as mentioned by authors: Gori and Corasaniti 2013. And most importantly why cylinder unit model, when eventually spatial correction is needed? 3. The model is only applicable to soils with the same sized particles and pores, which doesn’t exist in nature. There is also no thermal resistance in contacts. 4. The cylindrical unit cell is considered to be the REV, which is false. 5. The only water volume is the water bridges between the particles, which its volume depends on applied suction. What about the bulk water volume trapped between the particles? 6. Are the Equations given in this research derived by the authors or they are taken from literature? The references should be given. 7. Table 3 depicts the thermal conductivities given to each phase (Solids, Water and Air). How these parameters are determined? Isn’t this a fitting curve? The authors claim in the conclusion that their model represents the physical basis of heat conduction rather than empirical models’ curve-fitting to experimental results. 8. What about the effect of particle size on ETC? |
新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
看來鄭院士最近忙,我等了一個(gè)月也是1號(hào)給的修改意見 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
酷酷文曲
|
我看懂了,第一個(gè)審稿人認(rèn)為文獻(xiàn)小修后可發(fā)表,第二個(gè)覺得文章?lián)Q湯不換藥,沒有新意,然后列了一堆質(zhì)疑問題,所以應(yīng)該是大修或拒的意思。那文章的價(jià)值創(chuàng)新性可能要針對(duì)性的重申了。 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |

木蟲 (著名寫手)
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 招08考數(shù)學(xué) +4 | laoshidan 2026-03-20 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程348求調(diào)劑 +5 |  ̄^ ̄゜汗 2026-03-19 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 289材料與化工(085600)B區(qū)求調(diào)劑 +3 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-22 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 08工科 320總分 求調(diào)劑 +11 | 梨花珞晚風(fēng) 2026-03-17 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +10 | 申子申申 2026-03-19 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑院校信息 +6 | CX 330 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)調(diào)劑 +5 | Surekei 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 354求調(diào)劑 +7 | Tyoumou 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +3 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +9 | 簡單點(diǎn)0 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +6 | 梁茜雯 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學(xué)化學(xué)工藝專業(yè)(081702)315分求調(diào)劑 +12 | yangfz 2026-03-17 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 294求調(diào)劑材料與化工專碩 +15 | 陌の森林 2026-03-18 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +9 | 想上學(xué)吖吖 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿福大288有機(jī)化學(xué),求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小木蟲200408204 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +6 | 緒幸與子 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 344求調(diào)劑 +6 | knight344 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0854可跨調(diào)劑,一作一項(xiàng)核心論文五項(xiàng)專利,省、國級(jí)證書40+數(shù)一英一287 +8 | 小李0854 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|