| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 998 | 回復(fù): 3 | ||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者yuanye2010將贈送您 10 個金幣 | ||
yuanye2010金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
SCI二審大修意見如下,三審半個月變Ready for decision,當(dāng)天又變成 Decision Pending
|
|
|
三審半個月變成Ready for decision,當(dāng)天又變成 Decision Pending!求師兄師姐分析下結(jié)果!謝謝 要靠他畢業(yè)! 二審追加了兩次審稿人后四個審稿人意見如下: Associate Editor There are different opinions about this paper. The contributions of the paper remain unclear. The comparison with [29] should be justified. Simulation results need better organization and elaborations. A chance is provided to the authors to justify the work and additional reviewers may be assigned. Reviewer 1 The contributions of the paper are not clearly presented. The significance of the proposed work as compared to [29] should be justified. Reviewer 2 This paper proposes a distributed algorithm for the economic dispatch problem (EDP). It mainly studies the stochastic gradient-push method with asynchronous step-size and noisy gradient to deal with the finite delays in time-varying directed communication network of EDP. The author shows nice mathematical skills in presenting the results. However, the reviewer has to raise some questions about the model and algorithm in this study: 1. Why not to include ramp-up and ramp-down limit constraint for units in the EDP model? Is the proposed algorithm applicable for an EDP model with time coupling constraints? 2. The author should indicate the difference or improvement of the proposed algorithm in this study compared with reference [29]. 3. In introduction, the author mentioned ‘This work adopts asynchronous step-size, which provides a more flexible range for step-size.’ However, the advantage of asynchronous step-size is well displayed in Section 5. 4. Numerical results in Section 5 should be simplified or reorganized. The author can just take one test system to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in detail (for instance, 4-bus system). Moreover, comparison results between different cases are recommended to present in a table format for a better display. Reviewer 3 I have no further comments. Reviewer 4 The revised paper can be accepted by minor revisions. 1. Please give the name, unit of the vertical coordinates for figures. 2. The literature review is not sufficient. Please refer to:3篇參考文獻 愛斯維爾這個這次接收的紀律大嗎???已經(jīng) Decision Pending !謝謝 |
新蟲 (知名作家)
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
新蟲 (正式寫手)

| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航 335分 | 0856 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經(jīng)歷 +8 | cccchenso 2026-03-29 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京工業(yè)大學(xué),324分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 零八# 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博自薦 +6 | whh869393 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華東師范大學(xué)有機化學(xué)專業(yè),初試351分,復(fù)試被刷求調(diào)劑! +5 | 真名有冰 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +6 | 冬十三 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +15 | Micky11223 2026-03-25 | 20/1000 |
|
|
[考研] 294分080500材料科學(xué)與工程求調(diào)劑 +8 | 柳溪邊 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 22408 359分調(diào)劑 +4 | Qshers 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩,總分289分 +7 | @taotao 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑考研 +3 | 王杰一 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 化工專碩 338分 求調(diào)劑 +12 | 路癡小琪 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 347求調(diào)劑 +3 | 山頂見α 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085405 考的11408求各位老師帶走 +3 | Qiu學(xué)ing 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 086502化學(xué)工程342求調(diào)劑 +6 | 阿姨復(fù)古不過 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 07化學(xué)280分求調(diào)劑 +10 | 722865 2026-03-23 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華東理工大學(xué)081700,初試分數(shù)271 +6 | kotoko_ik 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
|
WWW西西弗斯 2026-03-24 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0854AI CV方向招收調(diào)劑 +4 | 章小魚567 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +4 | LHHL66 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|