| 查看: 7228 | 回復(fù): 46 | ||||
| 當(dāng)前主題已經(jīng)存檔。 | ||||
visitor958至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專家
|
[交流]
在香港召開的IEEM2009 - 會(huì)議審稿意見的交流與討論。
|
|||
|
據(jù)悉 IEEM2009 的接收信今天都已經(jīng)提前發(fā)出,也有不少朋友應(yīng)該收到了據(jù)信。雖然會(huì)有審稿意見有些主觀,甚至也許帶有偏見,但綜合來(lái)說(shuō),應(yīng)該有比較公正的評(píng)論和意見(相對(duì)會(huì)議來(lái)說(shuō)應(yīng)該算詳細(xì)的)。 真金不怕火煉,IEEM一直都有嚴(yán)格的審稿程序。大家交流一下,把評(píng)審意見發(fā)一發(fā),互相幫助和學(xué)習(xí)。 讓小木蟲學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議版起到更好的學(xué)術(shù)交流作用!大家寫文章也可以避免類似問(wèn)題,還有,也學(xué)習(xí)一下怎么寫審稿意見。。。 給個(gè)文章號(hào)和文章題目(不要作者姓名或單位),我確認(rèn)之后,按信息量獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)1-20個(gè)金幣!(會(huì)特別多給文章被拒的。) www.ieem2009.org [ Last edited by visitor958 on 2009-11-9 at 20:43 ] |
雜談 |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
呵呵。我首先發(fā)。雖然是接收。但是評(píng)審者提出了不少意見。 IEEM09-P-0XXX Research on the Relationship between XX of AA and YY We are pleased to inform you that this paper of yours has been accepted for presentation at IEEM 2009 in Hong Kong. Please incorporate the comments from reviewers in the final version of your paper. Your final paper has to be camera-ready and prepared following the IEEM2009 paper guidelines. Please also ensure that your paper is free from serious language mistakes. To maintain the international standard of IEEE conferences, we reserve the right to exclude your paper in the final proceedings if the language is deemed unsatisfactory. Note also that the abstract length accompanying your final paper may not exceed 150 words which is the standard requirement for inclusion in the Book of Program and Abstracts which will be distributed onsite to all participants. You may select your preferred presentation mode (oral/poster) when uploading the paper (there will be no differentiation in the proceedings, only for conference program). We may face schedule and venue constraints when preparing the program, so do be flexible. However, if for funding or other reasons, you need to give oral presentation, make sure that you select it. Reviewer 1 Grade C - This paper can be accepted for this conference after minor revision. A couple of comments for improvement are given below: Comment Title should be "... an empirical study in China" Many typos and other language mistake. Reviewer 3 Grade C - This paper can be accepted for this conference after minor revision. A couple of comments for improvement are given below: Comment 1. This paper discussed the relationship between XX and YY. Author proposed six XX factors and further using them to proposing six hypotheses. 2. Please explain the difference of "CC" and "DD" mentioned in Introduction section. 3. Citations and references in this paper must to be unified and standardized in a format. 4. Some typing errors, for example "(I)" in Subsetion 3.1, should be revised. [ Last edited by etblade on 2009-7-20 at 20:35 ] |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
|
IEEM09-P-0410 We are pleased to inform you that this paper of yours has been accepted for presentation at IEEM 2009 in Hong Kong. Note that this is the first batch of confirmed acceptance. Decisions on other papers are still pending and will be made before the deadline. Reviewer 1 Grade D - This paper needs a major revision before acceptance. In particular, the authors should consider the following comments: Comment The authors themselves mention that: "Computational tests demonstrate that high-quality solutions are obtained while expending modest computational effort. Due to the limit of this paper, data generation and procedure of computational tests are omitted." However, one should have some way to judge how good their solution methodology is. Preferably it should be supported by some complexity results of their proposed algorithm. If that is too difficult, one may think of including some experimental results to demonstrate the performance metrics of the algorithm. In the absence of any such result, it is impossible to assess the algorithm. So the authors should include either/both of the above in order to make the paper acceptable. Space is not a constraint here. Reviewer 2 Grade C - This paper can be accepted for this conference after minor revision. A couple of comments for improvement are given below: Comment 1. For reverse logistics issue, there are many papers have debated for it, could authors prove their model that using the real data to show the better results. 2. Do authors have different ideas for critical factors in the reverse logistics through figure 1 and integrate it to fit the content of their paper. Reviewer 3 Grade B - This is a suitable paper for this conference. Minor improvement can be done in terms of organization/language/review etc. The authors are advised to check the paper thoroughly and improve it a bit. Comment The problem dealt with in this paper is interesting. The methodology is well explained and justified. Quite a bit of details in the paper as well. However, the paper could be greatly enhanced if a numerical example is provided. Since the authors have stated that some computational tests are done, something could be shown to illustrate that. As this paper is just over 3 pages, there is space for it. Although the language is understandable, the authors should go through the paper carefully in submitting final version. Overall, it is a good piece of work and should be accepted for presentation. |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
|
IEEM09-P-0409 All submissions were reviewed for contents and technical merits by the international panel of reviewers. The conference received a large number of submissions, and we have to be very selective due to schedule and space constraints. Regrettably, it has been decided that your paper is not accepted for IEEM2009. We hope that the comments from the reviewers could be useful for you to improve the paper for a future conference. 這片被批得慘不忍睹亞 |
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專家
木蟲 (著名寫手)
金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
你好!這個(gè)會(huì)議正是被檢索需要多長(zhǎng)時(shí)間?由于急著畢業(yè),迫切想知道! IEEM09-P-0704 意見:Reviewer 1 Grade A - This paper is excellent and it should be accepted as it is. Comment Using a case study, improved Solow model was carried out for evaluating the contribution of water saving agriculture to economic growth. Reviewer 2 Grade C - This paper can be accepted for this conference after minor revision. A couple of comments for improvement are given below: Comment 1. This paper applies the Solow model to social benefit assessment of water saving agriculture. But it lacks a clear definition for “social benefit”. The following statement is not convincing: “E is the social benefit of water saving agriculture; E1 is the social benefit resulted from technological progress of water saving agriculture; E2 is the social benefit resulted from capital input of water saving agriculture.” 2. Improvement in language is expected. Examples: “All of these techniques have been deep influencing on economy, society and eco-environment.” “There were a number of researches on …”. 3. The paper is not well formatted. You have to exactly follow the IEEE format. |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
Reviewer 1 C - This paper can be accepted for this conference after minor revision. A couple of comments for improvement are given below: This paper can be accepted for this conference after minor revision. A couple of comments for improvement are given below: - In the references, it is surprising not to find more references on SC risk management (for example, Kleindorfer and Saad (2005), Jüttner (2005), Manuj and Mentzer (2008), Wagner and Bode (2008), among others), before concluding that “there is a shortage effort on enterprise logistics risk management”. - The reference [16] is not at the References. - Renumber the list of “Early warning indicators of non-systematic risk”. It starts with topic number 1(Early warning indicators of logistics process risk, pp. 3) and them jumps to topic number 3 (Early warning indicators of distribution logistics risk, pp. 5). Topic 2 seems to be not existent. - The relevant “book of systematic analysis” (pp. 5) is not indicated. - It is not clear how to use the membership function. Which ones are cost indicators, efficiency indicators, moderate indicators? - The model contribution isn’t clear; perhaps a practical application could be done in order to demonstrate the model potential. Reviewer 2 B - This is a suitable paper for this conference. Minor improvement can be done in terms of organization/language/review etc. The authors are advised to check the paper thoroughly and improve it a bit. Very interesting and promising paper. |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料科學(xué)與工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 深V宿舍吧 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研]
|
nnnnnnn5 2026-03-25 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京理工大學(xué)本科211材料工程294求調(diào)劑 +8 | mikasa的圍巾 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 學(xué)碩274求調(diào)劑 +9 | Li李魚 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 食品工程專碩一志愿中海洋309求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小張zxy張 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 311(085601)求調(diào)劑 +4 | liziyeyeye 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 312,生物學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小譯同學(xué)abc 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 320分,材料與化工專業(yè),求調(diào)劑 +9 | 一定上岸aaa 2026-03-27 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工(0856)304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +8 | 邱gl 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 266分,求材料冶金能源化工等調(diào)劑 +7 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)/290求調(diào)劑/本科經(jīng)歷豐富/工科也可 +9 | 丹青奶蓋 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | jhx777 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +9 | 小蠟新筆 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 +5 | .m.. 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +4 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研]
|
13659058978 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大化學(xué)322求調(diào)劑 +4 | 17501029541 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 335求調(diào)劑 +4 | yuyu宇 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | ALULU4408 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|