| 19 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1104 | 回復(fù): 18 | |||
[交流]
JC投稿被編輯拒絕,但是給了建議,不知道可不可以改了重新投,求建議
|
|||
|
i have examined your manuscript, and, i am sorry to have to turn down your paper without review. our journal concentrates on the reporting of fundamental aspects of catalysis, and there are problems in the reporting of the catalytic rates. our journal is a specialist journal of catalysis and we require accurate and complete measurement of reactivity. with rare exceptions (and ref. 13 is one) we require that catalytic results be reported as turnover frequencies. comparison should be made to the best in the literature to show you have outstanding results. you should have estimated the number of exposed ni sites and reported turnover frequencies in addition to conversions. the tofs should have been compared to the best in the literature. a mass balance should have been reported. it is standard to confirm the lack of mass transfer limitations. you can check this by making a weisz-prater analysis. procedures are reported in the literature. (see for example, the supplemental information section in journal of catalysis 257 (2008) 1-4, which should be cited.). usually, conversions above 40% are limited by mass transfer. in your case you have used too long a time or too much catalyst. very importantly, our journal deals with the properties of the catalyst or the mechanism of the reaction studied at a molecular level. there should be some spectroscopy to give information about some aspect of the catalyst or reaction so as to give insights at the atomic level. your characterization results are a step in the right direction, but more is needed. you should report how samples were handled and pretreated for the characterization and discuss how this impacts the results obtained and the relation to the catalyst properties at reaction conditions. the fact that there was only one reference to papers in our journal is further evidence that your paper is not suited to our readership. we are sorry that we could not be more positive on this occasion, but we thank you for your interest in the journal. please note that our decision does not reflect any doubts about the quality of the work reported, just the appropriateness of the work, and i hope you will rapidly receive a favorable response in a more suitable journal. [ Last edited by 戚薇 on 2020-11-4 at 08:14 ] |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+1/282
+1/99
+1/80
+1/58
+1/43
+1/38
+1/30
+1/14
+1/12
+1/10
+1/8
+1/7
+1/7
+1/5
+1/4
+1/2
+1/1
+1/1
+1/1
+1/1
至尊木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
新蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
新蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
如果沒(méi)有明確拒稿,可以重投,但是需要根據(jù)他的意見(jiàn),寫(xiě)一個(gè)詳細(xì)的回復(fù)并對(duì)文章做詳細(xì)的修改,高亮顯示,然后重投 發(fā)自小木蟲(chóng)Android客戶端 |
| 19 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程,267求調(diào)劑 +9 | minht 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085600,材料與化工321分調(diào)劑 +4 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +5 | Pigcasso 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大085600,310分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 李瀟可 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +5 | hanamiko 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 336材料求調(diào)劑 +7 | 陳瀅瑩 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑 +7 | 青檸檬1 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +7 | prayer13 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +17 | 碩星赴 2026-03-23 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 資源與環(huán)境 調(diào)劑申請(qǐng)(333分) +9 | holy J 2026-03-21 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 315分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 26考研上岸版26 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 290分調(diào)劑求助 +3 | 吉祥止止陳 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +5 | plum李子 2026-03-21 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | 話梅糖111 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑,求導(dǎo)師收 +7 | 天天好運(yùn)來(lái)上岸?/a> 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 研研,接電話 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +5 | Zhangbod 2026-03-21 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +3 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 要好好無(wú)聊 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料 271求調(diào)劑 +5 | 展信悅_ 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|