| 11 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 951 | 回復: 10 | |||
[交流]
一審意見回來,有點吃不準,大家?guī)兔纯矗?
|
|||
|
三個審稿意見,兩個比較正面,最后一個有點吃不準。編輯給了major revision。 reviewer 1: ...Overall, this is a very interesting and well executed paper. I have some questions and some suggestions for improvement, where the latter ones refer mainly to structure, motivation and readability. As the model is novel and, in my view, adds something important to the literature, the paper could make a valuable contribution to XXXX after a careful revision.... reviewer 1列了七八條意見,但都不太難回答。 reviewer 2: ...To the best of my knowledge, the authors are right that they are the first to carefully analyze a tractable equilibrium model with both belief heterogeneity and prospect-theory preferences. Theorems 1 and 2 are interesting, and so is the empirical exercise in section 4. As explained by the authors, prediction markets constitute a growing toolbox for aggregating probability forecasts. The theoretical literature discussed by the authors has aimed to improve on this toolbox, in part by better understanding the actual behavior of market participants. The present article is a very good contribution to this theoretical literature.... reviewer 2列了18條修改意見,但大部分都是指出一些typo外加一些語言敘述上的建議,總體也還好。 reviewer 3: This paper is interesting and engaging to read. ...The model and market equilibrium appear to be sound and are well-explained. Modelling prospect theory is not my area of expertise but the authors do a good job at explaining this to the non-expert. The paper is technical in nature and appears to be well-executed. I do have a number of substance concerns that that authors might consider. Each of these is discussed further below. The most concerning is whether the FLB or rFLB bias is actually the appropriate lens to empirically test a binary (win/lose or home/away) outcome. In my mind, this is not what the FLB or rFLB is about. ... 我感覺reviewer 3估計對這個topic不是太了解,他對我們的模型的適用性和一些基礎假設提出了疑問,但實際上這些假設在領域內算是比較常見的做法。前兩位審稿人明顯對這個topic比較了解,因此對這些假設沒有提出質疑。這種情況下如果我引一些領域內的相關文獻來證明假設的合理性,是否有機會扭轉reviewer 3的印象? |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+5/1690
+5/270
+1/185
+1/87
+5/85
+1/83
+1/79
+1/63
+2/42
+1/42
+1/34
+1/23
+1/12
+1/11
+2/8
+1/8
+1/6
+1/1
+1/1
+1/1
| 11 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程348求調劑 +4 |  ̄^ ̄゜汗 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境學碩288求調劑 +6 | 皮皮皮123456 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學071000 329分求調劑 +5 | 我愛生物生物愛?/a> 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 西北大學 ,070300化學學碩,總分287,雙非一本,求調劑。 +3 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 319求調劑 +4 | 小力氣珂珂 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 318求調劑 +4 | plum李子 2026-03-21 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學071000,求調劑 +4 | 沿岸有貝殼6 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 資源與環(huán)境 調劑申請(333分) +5 | holy J 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調劑 +5 | @taotao 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 268求調劑 +9 | 簡單點0 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 083200學碩321分一志愿暨南大學求調劑 +3 | innocenceF 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料 336 求調劑 +3 | An@. 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 350求調劑 +5 | weudhdk 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 北科281學碩材料求調劑 +5 | tcxiaoxx 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 廣西大學家禽遺傳育種課題組2026年碩士招生(接收計算機專業(yè)調劑) +3 | 123阿標 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調劑 +7 | 為學666 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調劑,英語六級551,有科研經(jīng)歷 +4 | 生物工程調劑 2026-03-16 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 考研求調劑 +3 | 橘頌. 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[論文投稿] 有沒有大佬發(fā)小論文能帶我個二作 +3 | 增銳漏人 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調劑 +3 | 淇ya_~ 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|