| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 906 | 回復(fù): 5 | ||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者agong將贈(zèng)送您 5 個(gè)金幣 | ||
[求助]
求助審稿意見的理解
|
||
|
字面意思看懂了,但是還請(qǐng)過來人看看,然后發(fā)表一些批評(píng)和建議。以及之后該怎么樣修改和下一步的投稿,謝謝大家。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
新蟲 (小有名氣)

| 鏈接: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1jOUKi7Hp2Y76vfRuQMJ1Qg 提取碼: euty 復(fù)制這段內(nèi)容后打開百度網(wǎng)盤手機(jī)App,操作更方便哦 |
|
Strong Aspects (Comments to the author: What are the strong aspects of the paper?) In this paper, the authors proposed an experience-based computational offloading with reinforcement learning in MEC network. Weak Aspects (Comments to the author: What are the weak aspects of the paper?) 1. In (11), it seems that the discount factor is 1, while the discount factor is defined as [0,1] in (12). It is not very clear. 2. Some symbols are undefined, i.e., the immediate reward r_t, the symbol \wedge in (15) 3. There are some flaw in the presentation, i.e., double “the task” in section II-B, the action should be defined in lowercase. 4. In algorithm 1, the meaning of “undated” is not clear. 5. It is better to compare the proposed algorithm with DQN not DDPG. Recommended Changes (Recommended changes. Please indicate any changes that should be made to the paper if accepted.) In this paper, the authors proposed an experience-based computational offloading with reinforcement learning in MEC network. The reviewer has the following comments. 1. In (11), it seems that the discount factor is 1, while the discount factor is defined as [0,1] in (12). It is not very clear. 2. Some symbols are undefined, i.e., the immediate reward r_t, the symbol \wedge in (15) 3. There are some flaw in the presentation, i.e., double “the task” in section II-B, the action should be defined in lowercase. 4. In algorithm 1, the meaning of “undated” is not clear. 5. It is better to compare the proposed algorithm with DQN not DDPG. |
|
Review 2 Relevance and Timeliness Technical Content and Scientific Rigour Novelty and Originality Quality of Presentation Good. (4) Solid work of notable importance. (4) Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated. (3) Well written. (4) Strong Aspects (Comments to the author: What are the strong aspects of the paper?) The paper proposes an improved experience based replay reinforcement learning algorithm (EBRL) for computation offloading by using MEC. The energy consumption and delay can be minimized by using the proposed algorithm compared with other algorithms. The paper is well written. Weak Aspects (Comments to the author: What are the weak aspects of the paper?) It is better to show more practical situation for performance comparison with considering realistic applications. Currently, only arrival rate is changed for considering different environment. Recommended Changes (Recommended changes. Please indicate any changes that should be made to the paper if accepted.) Please see the weak aspects. It is better to consider more realistic and practical situation. Robustness for environment change is another key performance for MEC offloading. |
|
Review 1 Relevance and Timeliness Technical Content and Scientific Rigour Novelty and Originality Quality of Presentation Acceptable. (3) Valid work but limited contribution. (3) Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated. (3) Readable, but revision is needed in some parts. (3) Strong Aspects (Comments to the author: What are the strong aspects of the paper?) This paper presents a new algorithm to offload edge tasks to edge serves within the MEC environment. Authors present an improved reinforcement learning framework according to dynamic environments, which selects samples from an improved experience pool. Simulation experiments reveal improved performance. Weak Aspects (Comments to the author: What are the weak aspects of the paper?) First, the distinction between the proposal and state-of-the-art reinforcement learning seems straightforward, as the selection of experience samples seems straightforward. Second, the simulation results are not discussed in details to explain the novelty of the proposal. Recommended Changes (Recommended changes. Please indicate any changes that should be made to the paper if accepted.) First, authors should explain the improvements. why experiences are vital to improve the performance of the reinforcement learning. And the selection of experience samples seems straightforward. Second, an example is favored to illustrate the workflow of the proposed algorithm. Third, the experiments do not present the detailed setup of the MEC environment, and the performance metrics. |
| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +12 | 素年祭語(yǔ) 2026-03-31 | 15/750 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 339求調(diào)劑,想調(diào)回江蘇 +7 | 烤麥芽 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 【求調(diào)劑】085601材料工程專碩 | 總分272 | +10 | 腳滑的守法公民 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)308分調(diào)劑 +13 | 你好明天你好 2026-03-30 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué) 296 求調(diào)劑 +9 | 朵朵- 2026-03-26 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +4 | 想上學(xué)求調(diào) 2026-04-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0855機(jī)械初試280求調(diào)劑 +3 | kazenotori 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 考研材料工程351分調(diào)劑 +5 | 整個(gè)好的 2026-03-31 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 339求調(diào)劑 +5 | zjjkt 2026-03-31 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 合肥區(qū)域性重點(diǎn)一本招收調(diào)劑 +4 | 6266jl 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 263求調(diào)劑 +3 | DDDDuu 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
|
小羊36 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 本科211安全工程,初試290分,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2719846834 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +3 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 293分求調(diào)劑,外語(yǔ)為俄語(yǔ) +5 | 加一一九 2026-03-31 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +6 | AZMK 2026-03-29 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +5 | wei-5 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +6 | 汲亦昊 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑 +3 | 種圣賜 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 315分求調(diào)劑 +7 | 26考研上岸版26 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|