 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2358 | 回復(fù): 3 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題，作者是個好影迷將贈送您 5 個金幣 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
請問elsevier這個revise-language狀態(tài)是需要大修嗎？ 已有3人參與
|
|||
|
投了一個三區(qū)文章現(xiàn)在第二次大修的意見返回View Decision的狀態(tài)是revise-language，但是給了兩個月。 編輯的意見是： Reviewer comments on your manuscript indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, I invite you to submit a revised version of your manuscript if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments included below. If you submit a revised manuscript, please consider the reviewer's comments carefully. Please resubmit your manuscript by Nov 28, 2022. 然后直接貼了兩個評審的評分表給我： 1. Are the objectives and the rationale of the study clearly stated? Reviewer #1: The objectives and the rationale are clearly described. Reviewer #3: 1、well stated -------------------- 2. If applicable, is the application/theory/method/study reported in sufficient detail to allow for its replicability and/or reproducibility? Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X: Yes [X] No [] N/A [] Provide further comments here: Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X: Yes [X] No [] N/A [] Provide further comments here: -------------------- 3. If applicable, are statistical analyses, controls, sampling mechanism, and statistical reporting (e.g., P-values, CIs, effect sizes) appropriate and well described? Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X: Yes [X] No [] N/A [] Provide further comments here: Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X: Yes [X] No [] N/A [] Provide further comments here: -------------------- 4. Could the manuscript benefit from additional tables or figures, or from improving or removing (some of the) existing ones? Please provide specific suggestions for improvements, removals, or additions of figures or tables. Please number each suggestion so that author(s) can more easily respond. Reviewer #1: Tables and figures are fine. Reviewer #3: the results had been well stated. -------------------- 5. If applicable, are the interpretation of results and study conclusions supported by the data? Reviewer #1: Mark as appropriate with an X: Yes [X] No [] N/A [] Provide further comments here: Reviewer #3: Mark as appropriate with an X: Yes [] No [] N/A [X] Provide further comments here: -------------------- 6. Have the authors clearly emphasized the strengths of their study/theory/methods/argument? Reviewer #1: They clearly described their strength of the study, Reviewer #3: No. highlights had not been well emphasized. -------------------- 7. Have the authors clearly stated the limitations of their study/theory/methods/argument? Reviewer #1: Yes, they clearly mentioned the limitation. Reviewer #3: 1. should be further analyzed in this research. -------------------- 8. Does the manuscript structure, flow or writing need improving (e.g., the addition of subheadings, shortening of text, reorganization of sections, or moving details from one section to another)? Reviewer #1: The structure of the paper is fine, Reviewer #3: 1. The logical meaning of some sentence are confusing,； such as "Hence, .... efficiency and usability." 2. there were a fair amount of grammatical errors found in this manuscript. -------------------- 9. Could the manuscript benefit from language editing? Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #3: Yes 主要是評審3提了①highlight寫得不夠好，②結(jié)果需要進(jìn)一步分析，③提了一個語法問題但認(rèn)為文章需要潤色 其實我二審已經(jīng)潤色過了，并且附上了elsevier的語言編輯證書，評審1覺得語言沒問題，評審3覺得有問題 關(guān)鍵編輯這句it is not acceptable for publication in its present form是套話還是委婉的拒稿..... |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
313求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
311求調(diào)劑一志愿合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑，求導(dǎo)師收
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
284求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
總分322求生物學(xué)/生化與分子/生物信息學(xué)相關(guān)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
070300化學(xué)求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
070300一志愿211，312分求調(diào)劑院校
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
085600 295分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
風(fēng)箏不想飛呀
木蟲之王 (文壇精英)
- 應(yīng)助: 651 (博士)
- 金幣: 70731.8
- 紅花: 188
- 沙發(fā): 59
- 帖子: 13610
- 在線: 742.2小時
- 蟲號: 7065795
- 注冊: 2017-08-15
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 電磁場與波
3樓2022-09-30 20:03:14
2樓2022-09-30 17:18:47
nono2009
超級版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
專家經(jīng)驗: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 應(yīng)助: 28684 (院士)
- 貴賓: 513.911
- 金幣: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 紅花: 2148
- 沙發(fā): 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在線: 65200.9小時
- 蟲號: 827383
- 注冊: 2009-08-13
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 工程熱物理與能源利用
- 管轄: 科研家籌備委員會
4樓2022-09-30 20:56:51
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 總分322求生物學(xué)/生化與分子/生物信息學(xué)相關(guān)調(diào)劑 +6 | 星沉uu 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿085600中科院寧波所276分求調(diào)劑 +7 | 材料學(xué)257求調(diào)劑 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +12 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 15/750 |
|
|
|
[考研] 335求調(diào)劑 +3 | 321* 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +12 | j的立方 2026-03-29 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +14 | 032500 2026-03-25 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 309求調(diào)劑 +15 | 誰不是少年 2026-03-29 | 15/750 |
|
|
|
[考研] 295材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +10 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 105500藥學(xué)求調(diào)劑，一志愿山東大學(xué)藥學(xué)，348分
+3
|
gr哈哈哈 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +10 | 宋明欣 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南開大學(xué)0710生物學(xué)359求調(diào)劑 +5 | 兔兔兔111223314 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +6 | 冬十三 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +6 | 汲亦昊 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +6 | Amber00 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +7 | 璞玉~~ 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085405 考的11408求各位老師帶走 +3 | Qiu學(xué)ing 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小懶蟲不懶了 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +9 | 小蠟新筆 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研一志愿蘇州大學(xué)初始315（英一）求調(diào)劑 +3 | sbdksD 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 277分求調(diào)劑，跨調(diào)材料 +3 | 考研調(diào)劑lxh 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|