| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
| 查看: 5477 | 回復(fù): 53 | |||
wu3833145木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
[交流]
投稿5個(gè)月后,終于收到回信了--大修 已有41人參與
|
|
第一篇SCI文章,投稿5個(gè)月后,終于收到回信了--大修,時(shí)間緊迫。╫ne week),由于本人沒(méi)什么經(jīng)驗(yàn),還請(qǐng)大家?guī)兔⒅\參謀給點(diǎn)指導(dǎo)意見(jiàn),謝謝啊 Dear xxxxx, You will be pleased to know that your paper entitled “xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx” is reviewed and will be re-evaluated for publication in xxxxxxxxxxxxxx only after incorporation of the following Major changes suggested by the referee(s) .Please find below the comments and send us the REVISED paper within a week(by May 2, 2009). 老外也有出錯(cuò)的時(shí)候啊 應(yīng)該是2010年5月2號(hào)之前吧。。。。,一共有5個(gè)審稿人審稿了。。。。。怎么這么多啊。。。。。。。 Referee 1 Comments: This is an interesting manuscript and allows the reader to see the original data used for xxxx. An important aspoect is that the influence of xxxxxxxxxhas been incorporated xxxxxxxxxxxxx. Although the manuscript is set out logically, it could do with a grammar check from a native English speaker. 第一位專(zhuān)家指出:英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法要修改,這個(gè)沒(méi)提太大意見(jiàn)吧?可是啊? Referee 2 Comments: This paper proposes prediction of xxxxxxxxxxxx by a model to analysis previously reported compounds. This is an important topic; however, 1. The manuscript did not give where the model Eq. (1) come from, or how is the Eq. (1) developed? 2. The model is not a new one. The prediction of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx by considering the role of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx has been reported in literature (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx). 我不懂This is an important topic是什么樣的一個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)啊,后面提了2個(gè)問(wèn)題,第一個(gè)我知道該如何回答。第2個(gè)問(wèn)題是我用到的一個(gè)因素前人已經(jīng)考慮到了,我也用了,所以不是new one,那應(yīng)該做出如何的見(jiàn)解?提出自己的心意嗎? Referee 3 Comments: I recommend that this manuscript should be accepted for publication after revision according to the following comment: 1) Page 3, line 7: Concerning xxxxxx: Are there any structural features in xxxxxx? If so, describe it briefly. 貌似第三位還比較支持,感謝感謝。提出了個(gè)問(wèn)題,說(shuō)我選的幾個(gè)化合物可有什么結(jié)構(gòu)上的特征,可是我思考了,貌似沒(méi)有,但我直接說(shuō)沒(méi)有嗎? Referee 4 Comments: The paper can not be judged due to experimental, molecular and meritorical problems. The structure of paper and procedures are not clearly described and seen not appropriate. Reviewer believes that this paper is irrelevant as typical medical paper about xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Data in paper mostly are not new, because Authors addressed fully or partially old data (see references 1, 2, 6, 12, 22, 23, 24). In generally Authors repeated data from other scientists. They are not presenting typical experimental data. In this situation it is difficult to discus xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and especially xxxxxxxxxxxx. About above problems they can only speculate. It is difficult to accept study, which are summarized on page 7 line 4 in next ways “xxxxxxxxxxxxx”. No scientific comments from neuroscience reviewer side may be being able to comment this computer specialist. Additionally in paper are grammar mistakes. It is typical paramedical paper. It can be consider in chemical, physical or mathematical journals for publication. 這位專(zhuān)家寫(xiě)了不少意見(jiàn)啊。。。。。呵呵 感謝感謝。!問(wèn)題還是很多啊 Referee 5 Comments: There are numerous spelling and grammatical errors throughout the manuscript that need to be corrected. The second paragraph in the introduction does not make any sense. The two sentences seem to be two separate ideas that are unconnected. Second page, end of first paragraph: The ‘biological factors’ are not discussed. Methods section, Descriptor Collection: There is no discussion about xxxxxxxxxxxx in the following section. A brief introduction to the methods xxxxxxxxxxxxx should be given. Methods section, Data Collection: There is no discussion as to how the compounds were partitioned into the training and test sets. Furthermore, it would appear from figure 1 that the chemical space represented by the compounds in the test set is not adequately covered by the compounds in the training set. (see, for example, compounds 98, 99, and 108). In addition, there are quite a few small organic compounds represented in the training set with no comparable examples in the test set. A quantitative measure of the chemical similarity, for example, may be informative. Taken together, these factors could bias the model towards the compounds in the training set. Results & Discussion – Development of Predictive Model: There is no discussion devoted to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. This is curious, as Table 1 indicates that the values of the descriptors calculated for these five compounds are (with on exception) within the dynamic range of the dataset used to train the model. Proper controls were not carried out with respect to model validation in both the training and test sets. The responses should be randomized (or scrambled) and the model building / validation carried out to ensure that the experimental approach cannot be attributed to modeling noise. Although the author’s efforts to include xxxxxxxxxxxx in the model are admirable, they have not actually shown that incorporation of these descriptors have resulted in a better model. The authors should use the same procedures to generate models without xxxxxxxxxxxxx, and compare the results to their existing model. If the model presented in the manuscript is shown to be significantly improved over these three models, the authors may make the claim that incorporation of xxxxxxxxxxx descriptors result in a model that is a better predictor of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. 第五位專(zhuān)家更是給出了很多寶貴意見(jiàn)啊。。。。。頭大啦 麻煩大家?guī)兔纯,可有希望啊,希望能中啊。。。。。謝謝 感謝感謝 |
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)

木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
至尊木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
至尊木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專(zhuān)家
新蟲(chóng) (文學(xué)泰斗)
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)

木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
應(yīng)該屬于擬接收的文章了,一定要先對(duì)每一個(gè)專(zhuān)家表示感謝,再逐一回復(fù),無(wú)法按照意見(jiàn)修改的,只要給出具體原因即可(個(gè)人經(jīng)驗(yàn)編輯和審稿人一般是很nice的,我有一篇文章,模擬數(shù)量無(wú)法打到審稿人要求,我直接回復(fù),因?yàn)槟M太花時(shí)間以及電腦硬件條件不夠,審稿人后來(lái)就沒(méi)再要求),先恭喜樓主一下。。。 Onward and upward! |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑,英語(yǔ)六級(jí)551,有科研經(jīng)歷 +3 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿985,本科211,0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù)319求調(diào)劑 +7 | Liwangman 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 070303一志愿西北大學(xué)學(xué)碩310找調(diào)劑 +6 | d如愿上岸 2026-03-12 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué) 305求調(diào)劑 +3 | FY_yy 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0854可跨調(diào)劑,一作一項(xiàng)核心論文五項(xiàng)專(zhuān)利,省、國(guó)級(jí)證書(shū)40+數(shù)一英一287 +8 | 小李0854 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0817 化學(xué)工程 299分求調(diào)劑 有科研經(jīng)歷 有二區(qū)文章 +7 | rare12345 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 ,六級(jí)已過(guò),有科研經(jīng)歷 +10 | 曦熙兮 2026-03-15 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +4 | 睿08 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +3 | 冷笙123 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +5 | 煙火先于春 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +8 | 一定有學(xué)上- 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 考研化學(xué)學(xué)碩調(diào)劑,一志愿985 +4 | 張vvvv 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中師范071000,325求調(diào)劑 +6 | RuitingC 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 277材料科學(xué)與工程080500求調(diào)劑 +3 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0856專(zhuān)碩279求調(diào)劑 +5 | 加油加油!? 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 22408總分284求調(diào)劑 +3 | InAspic 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 +4 | 奇點(diǎn)0314 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +3 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +4 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +4 | 學(xué)海漂泊 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|