| 查看: 1993 | 回復(fù): 17 | |||
nana820金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
【接收函的email都是主編發(fā)的嗎?】 已有7人參與
|
|
接收函的email都是主編發(fā)的嗎? 負(fù)責(zé)稿件的副主編是不是只負(fù)責(zé)推薦? |

木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
==================================== 哦,是這樣的,我的文章之前返回了審稿意見,小修,上面有句話 I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been recommended for publication in XXXX subject to revision in line with the attached reports. 是副主編發(fā)的,然后我們老板就說這就是接收函了,但是人家明明給了2點(diǎn)需要改的地方,狀態(tài)欄也是minor revision,然后我12號(hào)投出去到現(xiàn)在都還沒有消息,這個(gè)recommended for publication是啥意思?推薦給主編,讓主編決定嗎?還是說就算接收了,我被搞糊涂了 |

木蟲 (正式寫手)

金蟲 (小有名氣)

木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
你這個(gè)還有些修改的部分,修改完了肯定都會(huì)接受就跟我下面的這個(gè)類似 Dear Mr. Qin: The reviews for your manuscript are copied below. The reviewers have raised points that require consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript should be acceptable for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest. 我修改完回去兩天就收了 |

金蟲 (小有名氣)

木蟲 (正式寫手)

金蟲 (小有名氣)

木蟲 (正式寫手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|