| 查看: 6108 | 回復(fù): 10 | |||
sjtugtd至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
|
[交流]
No further comments的修改搞的回復(fù)怎么回復(fù),就回thanks可以嗎? 已有9人參與
|
|
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. They recommend minor revision and that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider your paper for publication. For your guidance, the reviewers' comments are appended below. Please incorporate all the final improvements and check all the Tables, Figures and References for possible errors and good quality. THereafter submit the MS again and I will forward it for the printing without further revision. Please note that minor revisions should be submitted within 30 days. To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/ejsobi/ and login as an Author. Your username is Your username is: ****** If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/ejsobi/automail_query.asp On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there. Yours sincerely, Yakov Kuzyakov Field Editor European Journal of Soil Biology Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The authors have done a good job in addressing my comments. The manuscript is acceptable to me and I have no further comments. Reviewer #3: No further comments. |
鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
![]() ![]() |
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

木蟲 (小有名氣)
至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
|
現(xiàn)附上我的response letter,供參考。。。 5 July, 2010 Dear Dr Tebbe, Re: Manuscript reference No. EJSOBI-D-10-00054 Please find attached the revised draft of our manuscript “Soluble organic nitrogen pools in horticultural soils under greenhouse cultivation: a case study”, which we would like to resubmit for publication as a Full Paper in the European Journal of Soil Biology. The comments of the reviewers were highly insightful and enabled us to greatly improve the quality of our manuscript. Below, we have provided our point-by-point responses to each of the reviewers’ comments. The line numbers refer to those in the original manuscript. Revisions in the text are shown using yellow highlight for additions (reviewer #1) and green highlight for reviewer #3. We hope that the revisions in the manuscript and our accompanying responses will be sufficient to make our manuscript suitable for publication in European Journal of Soil Biology. We shall look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Yours sincerely, E-mail: sjtugtd@gmail.com Responses to the comments of Reviewer #1 Line 42: Replace 'ecosystem' with 'ecosystems'. This change has been made. Line 44: Replace 'On the other hand' with 'Moreover'. This change has been made. Lines 60-65: The soil types of the two sites should be given. At line 73, the following text was added “The properties of the soil (a Fluvisol developing towards a Cambisol at both sites) are shown in Table 1. These soils had neutral to high pHs. ” Line 100: Replace 'quite high' with 'much higher'. This change has been made. Line 111: Replace 'relationship' with 'correlation'. This change has been made. Line: 120: Insert 'Reference' after 'plant uptake'. This change has been made and the reference to Ge et al 2010 has been included. Lines 146-148: rewrite the reference according to the Journal's rule. This change has been made. Table 1: The crops tested under different systems may affect the results of this study, the authors should discuss this. In addition, is there the same soil type between the two sites? Discussion on the effects of the crops (line 141-155) and soils studied (line 74 and Table 1) has been provided. Responses to reviewer #3 The title should be more focused and mention different types of cultivation (organic and conventional farming, open field and greenhouse cultivation). The title has been changed to reflect the reviewer’s comments to ‘Soluble organic nitrogen pools in greenhouse and open-filed horticultural soils under organic and conventional management: a case study ’ The abstract. It seemed not convincing to generally compare organic and conventional farming concerning SON responses as you provide only data for conventional (may only be organic) farming under greenhouse conditions and moreover from different sites and the significances of differences between organic and conventional farming (see QCP5 and TZP in Figure 1) were not indicated properly. Therefore, you should rethink this conclusion. While the differences between organic and conventional farming on SON have been stated, lines 31–32, the following text has also been added at line 37 ‘The reasons for the observed differences in pool sizes of SIN and NO3- in the greenhouse soils and the open fields include (a) the heavy applications of both complex fertilizer and organic fertilizer that exceeded crop requirements and (b) warmer temperatures and moist soils in the greenhouses, which are likely to lead to greater rates of N cycling compared with the open field soils. These results suggest that SON may be an important source of N in all horticultural systems, representing a pool of labile N readily available for plant growth. However, its concentration is less sensitive to different management practices than SIN. In contrast to SON, the total soluble nitrogen and inorganic N (SIN) pools varied widely with the different management practices although they were dominated by NO3- in all treatments. Soil organic N was positively related to dissolved organic carbon and NO3- contents. This relationship indicates that NO3- and dissolved organic matter play a key role in the retention of SON in soil.’ We also add some more labels to Figure 1. i.e. QCP1 QCP5, QCP7 were greenhouse soils (organic farming), QCO1, 2 and 4 were open field organic |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070305高分子化學(xué)與物理 304分求調(diào)劑 +7 | c297914 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué)材料與化工(085600)296求調(diào)劑 +12 | 稻妻小編 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | 蕉蕉123 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 22408 359分調(diào)劑 +4 | Qshers 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 315求調(diào)劑 +4 | akie... 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿海大,0703化學(xué)學(xué)碩304分,有大創(chuàng)項(xiàng)目,四級(jí)已過 +7 | 幸運(yùn)哩哩 2026-03-22 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南大學(xué)化學(xué)0703總分337求調(diào)劑 +5 | niko- 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +12 | PolarBear11 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學(xué)324求調(diào)劑 +7 | hanamiko 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海理工能源動(dòng)力(085800)310分求調(diào)劑 +3 | zhangmingc 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑,一志愿南農(nóng)083200食品科學(xué)與工程 +5 | XQTJZ 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085601 材料工程 313分 求調(diào)劑 +5 | Ong3 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
WWW西西弗斯 2026-03-24 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 263求調(diào)劑 +6 | yqdszhdap- 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩 335 分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拒絕冷暴力 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 293求調(diào)劑 +7 | 加一一九 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[有機(jī)交流]
20+3
|
FENGSHUJEI 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 277分求調(diào)劑,跨調(diào)材料 +3 | 考研調(diào)劑lxh 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑(一志愿湖南大學(xué)070300) +5 | 番茄頭--- 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|