| 24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 6080 | 回復(fù): 36 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
museum木蟲(chóng) (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
【原創(chuàng)】《Journal of Hydrology》再次失敗... 已有30人參與
|
||
|
最近看有蟲(chóng)蟲(chóng)把一年前的貼子“地學(xué)口的朋友,有投過(guò)《Journal of Hydrology》的么”又續(xù)上討論了 (http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1485435&fpage=0&view=&highlight=&page=1),其實(shí)我本不打算再更新了,但確實(shí)又想再留下些什么,無(wú)奈原貼主文已無(wú)法進(jìn)行編輯,所以另開(kāi)一篇,算是我這篇稿件沖擊JH的一個(gè)過(guò)程說(shuō)明吧,希望能對(duì)地學(xué)口或是想投JH期刊的蟲(chóng)蟲(chóng)有所幫助! 雖不是學(xué)水文學(xué)出身,但垂涎 Journal of Hydrology期刊由來(lái)已久。電腦里Endnote中也是JH的期刊文獻(xiàn)最多(因?yàn)槠綍r(shí)讀的最多)。這已經(jīng)是我第二篇稿件沖擊JH了,可惜還是失敗,之前篇投JH被拒的稿件改投IF=1。3的期刊,目前正小修中。 言歸正傳吧 [2009-07-02] 稿件新投稿 [2009-07-03] 稿子分配了Manuscript No,狀態(tài)變?yōu)镋ditor Assigned [2009-07-06] 稿子狀態(tài)還是Editor Assigned,但時(shí)間更新了一下 [2009-07-24] 稿子狀態(tài)還是Editor Assigned,但時(shí)間再次更新 [2009-08-12] 我有點(diǎn)等不及了,給editor發(fā)了封電郵去催了催 [2009-09-01] 稿子狀誠(chéng)變?yōu)?quot;reviewer invited" [2009-09-03] 稿子狀態(tài)變?yōu)?quot;under review" [2009-11-03] 稿子狀態(tài)不變,還是“under review”,但時(shí)間更新了! [2009-12-02] 稿子狀態(tài)變?yōu)?quot;with editor" [2009-12-03] 稿子狀態(tài)變?yōu)?quot;Decision in Process" [2009-12-08] Reject,同時(shí)收到comments! ***************************************************************************** Dear ***, I very much regret to have to tell you that publication in our journal is not recommended. An explanation for this decision is given in the attached review reports (and on http://ees.elsevier.com/hydrol/). I hope that the comments contained therein will be of use to you. Thank you for your interest in our journal. With kind regards, Andreas Bardossy Editor Journal of Hydrology -------------------------------------------- Reviewer #1: Comments on paper by ***. submitted to Journal of Hydrology This paper addressed **** by analyzing ****. Generally, it is a kind of conventional research. Actually, overwhelmingly abundant studies are available concerning ****. Any more similar studies will not further help to understand ****. Besides, to my best knowledge, there are some studies addressing *****. Repeated studies of similar topics are not attractive and impressive. There are other similar studies and I can not list them all here. The authors should thoroughly review and discuss the previous studies, addressing the novelty of the current study when compared to the previous ones. I think the publication of the study in the Journal of Hydrology requires novelty of the study or the knowledge contribution of the study to the hydrology. However, the current study can not satisfy these requirements. Therefore, I recommend rejection of this paper. 不死心,在原稿的基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)行了大幅修改(其實(shí)基本相當(dāng)于重寫了,監(jiān)測(cè)數(shù)據(jù)增加四倍…),重投,重寫完后自己經(jīng)感覺(jué)相當(dāng)良好,由于是在原稿基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行的修改,我甚至在cover letter中和editor說(shuō)“we also prefer to suggest the same reviewers (reviewers for No.我被拒的那篇稿號(hào)), we are confident that they will be satisfied for the new manuscript.”。當(dāng)時(shí),感覺(jué)真的是太良好了(自大的覺(jué)的:這稿子怎么可能會(huì)拒?),于是,開(kāi)始了新一輪流程 [2010-01-21] Submitted to Journal [2010-01-26] Editor Assigned [2010-02-03] Reviewers invited [2010-02-12] Under Review [2010-03-29] Reviewers invited [2010-03-30] Under Review [2010-05-28] With Editor [2010-06-01] Decision in Process [2010-06-07] Reject,同時(shí)收到comments! ***************************************************************************** Dear ***, I very much regret to have to tell you that publication in our journal is not recommended. An explanation for this decision is given in the attached review reports (and on http://ees.elsevier.com/hydrol/). I hope that the comments contained therein will be of use to you. Thank you for your interest in our journal. With kind regards, Andras Bardossy Editor Journal of Hydrology .......................................................... Reviewer #1: Gnearnal comment: A good paper should be the one: 1) being devoted to address an important scientific problem; 2) developing a novel method; or 3) focusing improvement of an existing method. It is also acceptable to answer a problem by using existing methods. However, I can not find the strong motivations that can justify the current study after finish reading the "Introduction" section. Besides, the objectives of this study are not impressive or attractive yet. Based on the literature review by the authors, the current study is more like a repeated research when taking into the published literatures. What are the novel points of this study when compared to the published literatures? What are the differences between the current study and the published ones? In summary, I can not find any merits of publication of this paper in Journal of Hydrology. Straightforward rejection is what I recommend strongly. Detailed comments 略)Reviewer #2: Gnearnal comment: This paper is a good paper. It supplements statistical analysis with physical evidence to investigate ******. One weakness of numerous previous studies is the dependence on statistical methods alone in analyzing ****, often **** without investigating other possible factors. This paper follows a balanced approach that investigates the effects *********** to conclude a rough contribution of each cause. I think this paper can be informative to the audience of the Journal of Hydrology, and thus recommend its acceptance. I urge the authors to carefully review the language of the paper (some suggestions are given below). Detailed comments 略)***************************************************************************** 其實(shí)看到Reviewer #1的comments,心中很是不服的(百分百的國(guó)內(nèi)審稿人),想著申訴的,后來(lái)看看論壇中其他蟲(chóng)蟲(chóng)關(guān)于申訴的貼子,決定不在這浪費(fèi)時(shí)間了,直接改投了! 小結(jié):JH作為水文界TOP級(jí)刊物,門檻還是比較高。但整理而言,審稿效率算是很快了! 感慨:JH,我的夢(mèng),我還會(huì)再努力的! [ Last edited by museum on 2010-7-27 at 13:14 ] |
科研 |
金蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
| 半年啊,不算長(zhǎng)。我們專業(yè)你投稿沒(méi)錢沒(méi)關(guān)系的話至少要一年,老師直接就跟我們說(shuō)你們要提前一年投才能在畢業(yè)前見(jiàn)刊。 |

捐助貴賓 (正式寫手)
捐助貴賓 (正式寫手)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
百度網(wǎng)盤 |
360云盤 |
千易網(wǎng)盤 |
華為網(wǎng)盤
在新窗口頁(yè)面中打開(kāi)自己喜歡的網(wǎng)盤網(wǎng)站,將文件上傳后,然后將下載鏈接復(fù)制到帖子內(nèi)容中就可以了。 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 289材料與化工(085600)B區(qū)求調(diào)劑 +3 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-22 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境學(xué)碩288求調(diào)劑 +6 | 皮皮皮123456 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +6 | shansx 2026-03-22 | 8/400 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 山東省面上項(xiàng)目限額評(píng)審 +4 | 石瑞0426 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 286分人工智能專業(yè)請(qǐng)求調(diào)劑愿意跨考! +4 | lemonzzn 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)297求調(diào)劑 +3 | Daisy☆ 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 306求0703調(diào)劑一志愿華中師范 +5 | 紙魚(yú)ly 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085700資源與環(huán)境308求調(diào)劑 +12 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-18 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學(xué)085700資源與環(huán)境專碩,總分308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 西北大學(xué) ,070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩,總分287,雙非一本,求調(diào)劑。 +4 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)289分 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +4 | Stella_Yao 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉林大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩321求調(diào)劑 +11 | Ymlll 2026-03-18 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 085410人工智能專碩317求調(diào)劑(0854都可以) +4 | xbxudjdn 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +6 | lemonzzn 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿福大288有機(jī)化學(xué),求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小木蟲(chóng)200408204 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +3 | 淇ya_~ 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
zhouzhen654 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 文思客 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|