 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 4/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 6091 | 回復(fù): 36 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
museum木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
【原創(chuàng)】《Journal of Hydrology》再次失敗... 已有30人參與
|
||
|
最近看有蟲蟲把一年前的貼子“地學(xué)口的朋友，有投過《Journal of Hydrology》的么”又續(xù)上討論了 （http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1485435&fpage=0&view=&highlight=&page=1），其實我本不打算再更新了，但確實又想再留下些什么，無奈原貼主文已無法進行編輯，所以另開一篇，算是我這篇稿件沖擊JH的一個過程說明吧，希望能對地學(xué)口或是想投JH期刊的蟲蟲有所幫助！ 雖不是學(xué)水文學(xué)出身，但垂涎 Journal of Hydrology期刊由來已久。電腦里Endnote中也是JH的期刊文獻最多（因為平時讀的最多）。這已經(jīng)是我第二篇稿件沖擊JH了，可惜還是失敗，之前篇投JH被拒的稿件改投IF=1。3的期刊，目前正小修中。 言歸正傳吧 [2009-07-02] 稿件新投稿 [2009-07-03] 稿子分配了Manuscript No，狀態(tài)變?yōu)镋ditor Assigned [2009-07-06] 稿子狀態(tài)還是Editor Assigned，但時間更新了一下 [2009-07-24] 稿子狀態(tài)還是Editor Assigned，但時間再次更新 [2009-08-12] 我有點等不及了，給editor發(fā)了封電郵去催了催 [2009-09-01] 稿子狀誠變?yōu)?quot;reviewer invited" [2009-09-03] 稿子狀態(tài)變?yōu)?quot;under review" [2009-11-03] 稿子狀態(tài)不變，還是“under review”，但時間更新了！ [2009-12-02] 稿子狀態(tài)變?yōu)?quot;with editor" [2009-12-03] 稿子狀態(tài)變?yōu)?quot;Decision in Process" [2009-12-08] Reject，同時收到comments！ ***************************************************************************** Dear ***, I very much regret to have to tell you that publication in our journal is not recommended. An explanation for this decision is given in the attached review reports (and on http://ees.elsevier.com/hydrol/). I hope that the comments contained therein will be of use to you. Thank you for your interest in our journal. With kind regards, Andreas Bardossy Editor Journal of Hydrology -------------------------------------------- Reviewer #1: Comments on paper by ***. submitted to Journal of Hydrology This paper addressed **** by analyzing ****. Generally, it is a kind of conventional research. Actually, overwhelmingly abundant studies are available concerning ****. Any more similar studies will not further help to understand ****. Besides, to my best knowledge, there are some studies addressing *****. Repeated studies of similar topics are not attractive and impressive. There are other similar studies and I can not list them all here. The authors should thoroughly review and discuss the previous studies, addressing the novelty of the current study when compared to the previous ones. I think the publication of the study in the Journal of Hydrology requires novelty of the study or the knowledge contribution of the study to the hydrology. However, the current study can not satisfy these requirements. Therefore, I recommend rejection of this paper. 不死心，在原稿的基礎(chǔ)上，進行了大幅修改（其實基本相當(dāng)于重寫了，監(jiān)測數(shù)據(jù)增加四倍…），重投，重寫完后自己經(jīng)感覺相當(dāng)良好，由于是在原稿基礎(chǔ)上進行的修改，我甚至在cover letter中和editor說“we also prefer to suggest the same reviewers (reviewers for No.我被拒的那篇稿號), we are confident that they will be satisfied for the new manuscript.”。當(dāng)時，感覺真的是太良好了（自大的覺的：這稿子怎么可能會拒？），于是，開始了新一輪流程 [2010-01-21] Submitted to Journal [2010-01-26] Editor Assigned [2010-02-03] Reviewers invited [2010-02-12] Under Review [2010-03-29] Reviewers invited [2010-03-30] Under Review [2010-05-28] With Editor [2010-06-01] Decision in Process [2010-06-07] Reject，同時收到comments！ ***************************************************************************** Dear ***, I very much regret to have to tell you that publication in our journal is not recommended. An explanation for this decision is given in the attached review reports (and on http://ees.elsevier.com/hydrol/). I hope that the comments contained therein will be of use to you. Thank you for your interest in our journal. With kind regards, Andras Bardossy Editor Journal of Hydrology .......................................................... Reviewer #1: Gnearnal comment: A good paper should be the one: 1) being devoted to address an important scientific problem; 2) developing a novel method; or 3) focusing improvement of an existing method. It is also acceptable to answer a problem by using existing methods. However, I can not find the strong motivations that can justify the current study after finish reading the "Introduction" section. Besides, the objectives of this study are not impressive or attractive yet. Based on the literature review by the authors, the current study is more like a repeated research when taking into the published literatures. What are the novel points of this study when compared to the published literatures? What are the differences between the current study and the published ones? In summary, I can not find any merits of publication of this paper in Journal of Hydrology. Straightforward rejection is what I recommend strongly. Detailed comments  略)Reviewer #2: Gnearnal comment: This paper is a good paper. It supplements statistical analysis with physical evidence to investigate ******. One weakness of numerous previous studies is the dependence on statistical methods alone in analyzing ****, often **** without investigating other possible factors. This paper follows a balanced approach that investigates the effects *********** to conclude a rough contribution of each cause. I think this paper can be informative to the audience of the Journal of Hydrology, and thus recommend its acceptance. I urge the authors to carefully review the language of the paper (some suggestions are given below). Detailed comments 略)***************************************************************************** 其實看到Reviewer #1的comments，心中很是不服的（百分百的國內(nèi)審稿人），想著申訴的，后來看看論壇中其他蟲蟲關(guān)于申訴的貼子，決定不在這浪費時間了，直接改投了！ 小結(jié)：JH作為水文界TOP級刊物，門檻還是比較高。但整理而言，審稿效率算是很快了！ 感慨：JH，我的夢，我還會再努力的！ [ Last edited by museum on 2010-7-27 at 13:14 ] |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
西南科技大學(xué) 調(diào)劑 綿陽
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
散金幣，求基金中標(biāo)��！
已經(jīng)有42人回復(fù)
-
地球物理學(xué)和空間物理學(xué)論文潤色/翻譯怎么收費?
已經(jīng)有164人回復(fù)
zzhxxll
金蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 2 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1297.9
- 散金: 628
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 1169
- 在線: 130.5小時
- 蟲號: 692579
- 注冊: 2009-01-14
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 水環(huán)境與生態(tài)水利
繼續(xù)努力！ 31樓2011-11-26 19:00:46
2樓2010-07-27 13:22:37
snowhydro
捐助貴賓 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 95.6
- 散金: 654
- 帖子: 321
- 在線: 44.2小時
- 蟲號: 216499
- 注冊: 2006-03-11
- 專業(yè): 遙感機理與方法
4樓2010-07-27 22:13:28
snowhydro
捐助貴賓 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 95.6
- 散金: 654
- 帖子: 321
- 在線: 44.2小時
- 蟲號: 216499
- 注冊: 2006-03-11
- 專業(yè): 遙感機理與方法
5樓2010-07-27 22:13:56
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料277求調(diào)劑 +3 | min3 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +6 | 一志愿京區(qū)211 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +10 | 碩星赴 2026-03-23 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 招08考數(shù)學(xué) +7 | laoshidan 2026-03-20 | 16/800 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料292調(diào)劑 +8 | 橘頌思美人 2026-03-23 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工328分調(diào)劑 +4 | 。，。，。，。i 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大化學(xué)322求調(diào)劑 +4 | 17501029541 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 請教下大家 2026年國家基金申請是雙盲審嗎？ +3 | lishucheng1 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境學(xué)碩288求調(diào)劑 +8 | 皮皮皮123456 2026-03-22 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑(一志愿湖南大學(xué)070300) +5 | 番茄頭--- 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料/農(nóng)業(yè)專業(yè)，07/08開頭均可，過線就行 +3 | 呵唔哦豁 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +5 | 孅華 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 一志愿070300浙大化學(xué)358分，求調(diào)劑！
+4
|
酥酥魚.. 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +3 | 喜歡還是不甘心 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +5 | 紅衣隱官 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +3 | 鳳凰院丁真 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 南昌大學(xué)材料專碩311分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 77chaselx 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +10 | S.H1 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +7 | 司空. 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +7 | ^O^乜 2026-03-19 | 7/350 |
|