版塊導(dǎo)航: 正在加載中...

登錄注冊

應(yīng)《網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未進(jìn)行實(shí)名認(rèn)證將不得使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)跟帖服務(wù)。為保障您的帳號(hào)能夠正常使用，請盡快對帳號(hào)進(jìn)行手機(jī)號(hào)驗(yàn)證，感謝您的理解與支持！

24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜

北京石油化工學(xué)院2026年研究生招生接收調(diào)劑公告

返回列表

zbc2008

銀蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 423.8
散金: 3
帖子: 151
在線: 41.7小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 735562
注冊: 2009-03-30
專業(yè): 無機(jī)非金屬類光電信息與功

[交流] 請高手看下審稿人的意見是什么意思.謝謝

第一次的審稿意見.
Do you mean double excitations from the 1s electrons? But if the 1s population changes in the transition (Ka,Kb), the lower state possesses ~-1.0 eV more correlation energy than the upper state. If you have neglected this effect it maybe fairly easy to repair it. It would include calculating the 1s2 pair energy for the few lower states,correcting the wavelengths, and perhaps (except? in the most highly ionized cases) re-scaling the f-values (assuming the length form is proportional to dE).

Or do you mean that you exclude double excitations from the valence (n=2) shell? For example,the dynamical correlation 2p2->vd2. These can be energetically important-see for example the paper by Oksuz and Sinanoglu (Phys.Rev.181,54(1969)). If you are excluding either of the two above types,you should provide additional results including these effects to see what energy errors are made by excluding them (say for O I like Krn+).

For f-values,exclusion of either of these effects may not be as critical

這是二審的意見

Your text leaves me with the impression that atoms Be through Ne include just single excitation. One interpretation of that is you do a Dirac-Fock single configuration calculation (I suppose that is N=0 for you) and add single excitations to that. For example for He-like Kr, this would include 1s2 + 1s.

Is that what you are doing? If so, it's unacceptable when you're breaking the K shell. There is ~1.0 eV in that shell which contributes directly to the energy differences of interest to you. For example (He-like) 1s2 -> vp2 supplies about 0.5 eV of the 1.0 eV. Is that present for you for B-like to Ne-like krypton?

If we agree on what you actually did, then you need to replace "single excitation" with something more accurate (would this be an n=1 level calculation?)

希望某位高手解釋下這個(gè)意見是什么意思.有沒有好的方法解決.謝謝你在百忙中看這條消息

回復(fù)此樓

» 猜你喜歡

085405 考的11408求各位老師帶走已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
339求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
材料與化工272求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
085701環(huán)境工程，267求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
材料求調(diào)劑一志愿哈工大324 已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
292求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
304求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
材料與化工考研調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
321求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
329求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)

» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:

這種審稿意見是什么意思�。吭趺椿貜�(fù)好哦已經(jīng)有41人回復(fù)
審稿人說有句話有語法問題，請高手幫忙看下，有BB奉送已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
請高手幫我看看審稿人的意見，其中一句話，我怎么也看不懂已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
審稿人的這句話是什么意思呢？單晶方面的，還請高手幫看看啊已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
計(jì)算機(jī)或數(shù)學(xué)專業(yè)幫忙看下這條意見是什么意思，謝謝已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
關(guān)于審稿人意見,求助高手已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
大家?guī)臀铱纯催@個(gè)審稿人的意見是什么意思已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
【求助】審稿人的意見是什么意思，怎么解決？已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
【求助】請教一下審稿人的意見是什么意思？已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
【求助】晶體學(xué)報(bào)E 的審稿人給了幾條修改意見，不知如何解答，請高手指教�。。� 已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
【求助】審稿人意見，沒看懂，請教高手已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
請大家?guī)臀铱聪逻@個(gè)審稿意見是什么意思？已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)

1樓 2010-09-15 22:10:38

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

wandaohzl

榮譽(yù)版主 (著名寫手)

應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
貴賓: 1.809
金幣: 9446.3
散金: 5973
紅花: 197
沙發(fā): 4
帖子: 1838
在線: 416.7小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 759399
注冊: 2009-04-28
專業(yè): 污染控制化學(xué)
管轄: 微米和納米

zbc2008(金幣+3): 2010-09-16 14:16:15

這是給你的論文里觀點(diǎn)的質(zhì)疑和老板商議下按審稿人意見改

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

上下求索

2樓2010-09-16 10:52:32

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn) 我要訂閱樓主 zbc2008 的主題更新