| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2171 | 回復(fù): 12 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
cai05330金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
投materials and deisgn 的第二篇,雖然沒被拒,但是感覺比較悲觀 已有12人參與
|
||
|
一個月內(nèi)同時投了兩篇在M&D,第一篇修改稿發(fā)回去了,狀態(tài)under review,第二篇結(jié)果回來了,但是審稿人1的意見很負面,糾結(jié)中,不知道希望如何 Dear Mr ****** The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jmad/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, K.L. Edwards Editor in Chief Materials and Design Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: 1- Manuscript needs to be edited for some grammar and dictation irregularities, e.g. page 3, line5: polishing 5 ., should be: polishing with 5 .. Page 4, second paragraph, line 3: the claim of "The slope of those curves", those curves is not a good statement for explain about the curves shown in Fig. 4. 2- In research highlights, no.1 is not a new result of this research and is expected in any hardness measurements. 3- The claim of "Indentation hardness showed strong indentation size effects in experiments" in research highlights and abstract is referred to nothing. The effect of indentation size on what should be mentioned. 4- Keywords could not address the paper properly. It seems some keywords are missed. 5- The last six lines of Introduction section are written in a format that is not common. This part could be composed of overall pathway of the research. 6- Some parts of table 1 are got disordered in the file. Also, the composition of the alloy should be written in wt.% not in wt. 7- The scale bars of Fig.2 and Fig.3 should have a unique format. 8- Some indentation traces in Fig.3 are gone out of alpha phase. It could introduce some errors in hardness measurements. 9- Fig. 9 is an illustration of the mesh used for FEM modeling. But in the page 9, section 3.3.2 it is claimed that "The FEM simulation model is illustrated in Fig.9". 10- Why elements in FEM modeling are not selected as squares? In rectangular shaped models, the strain and stress distribution could not be defined uniformly through the whole area. 11- In page 10, it is claimed that "R is a commonly used statistical parameter .", but a better parameter for evaluation the best fitted curve is the value of R^2. For the presented data, R^2 is equal to 0.9956. It seems that by considering this value in calculating the average error, higher error values are achieved. This issue is concerning because it may reject the linear relation hat is claimed in the manuscript. The relative high error value (12.02 %) could confirm some deviations from linear curves fitting. Could author(s) explain more about this error value? 12- The overall review about the manuscript shows that the only new work that is conducted in this research is working on Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Any new relation or behavior about micro indentation or the resulted mechanical measurements is not reported. Also, any compare between the data obtained from this work and data obtained from other methods is not performed. Reviewer #2: First keyword should be corrected as Non-ferrous metals and alloys. In thirs research highlights the sentenced should be corrected as "led to a good agreement with the experiment" In page 3 line 2 um should be corrected as micrometer or |
金蟲 (正式寫手)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 375求調(diào)劑 +3 | 雨夏整夜 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +7 | 楒桉 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑考研 +3 | 王杰一 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)材料與化工方向336分 +9 | 辰沐5211314 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 求調(diào)劑 有機化學(xué)考研356分 +3 | Nadiums 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 爭取九點睡 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工272求調(diào)劑 +9 | 阿斯蒂芬2004 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 蘆lty 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +15 | hhhhxn.. 2026-03-23 | 21/1050 |
|
|
[考研]
|
孅華 2026-03-22 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工085600,總分304,本科有兩篇sci參與,求調(diào)劑 +10 | 幸運的醬醬 2026-03-22 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑(080500) +4 | A child 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +5 | hanamiko 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 林之夕 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +11 | junqihahaha 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 【2026考研調(diào)劑】制藥工程 284分 求相關(guān)專業(yè)調(diào)劑名額 +4 | 袁奐奐 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 研研,接電話 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | ALULU4408 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 接收2026碩士調(diào)劑(學(xué)碩+專碩) +4 | allen-yin 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|