| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1313 | 回復(fù): 4 | |||
zlwcw木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
【討論】2010 制藥公司大裁員意味著 中國的就業(yè)幾率會大幅增加 已有1人參與
|
|
http://blog.pharmexec.com/2010/1 ... ffs-for-big-pharma/ 2010: A Year of Big Layoffs for Big Pharma By Jennifer Ringler | Published: October 19, 2010 What are the factors that are contributing to the layoffs that have taken place at virtually all the Big Pharma companies this year? According to the newly released Job-Cut Announcement Report from outplacement consultancy firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, pharma has cut more than 6,000 jobs in September alone, and more than 43,000 so far this year. Which companies have contributed to this staggering number, and what are the underlying causes of job losses in the industry? Most recently, Sanofi-Aventis announced its plans to eliminate 1,700 jobs in its US pharma business—about 25 percent of the company’s US pharma workers. The majority of jobs lost will be sales positions, and a small number of administrative jobs will disappear as well. Before that, in September, Roche announced its “Operational Excellence Initiative,” which—while partly intended to analyze and restructure different segments of the company to maximize productivity and ROI—ultimately amounted to job cuts in an effort to “set the right priorities to ensure a successful future,” according to a statement released by Roche. In May, Pfizer announced 6,000 layoffs that it said was part of “manufacturing reorganization” following its 2009 Wyeth acquisition. Possibly part of its plan to remain on track for its targeted cost reduction of $4 to $5 billion by the end of 2012, Pfizer has gone from nearly 114,000 employees internationally in Q 1 2010 to around 33,000 as of May of this year, according to a story on DailyFinance.com. Following its 2009 acquisition of Schering-Plough, Merck began making cuts in February. The post-merger cuts would be a way to “eliminate some of the duplication,” according to a statement made in January by Merck CEO Dick Clark. “We have taken the best from both companies, from a process standpoint and a people standpoint,” he said. And at the start of the year, way back in January, AstraZeneca announced its plan to cut around 8,000 jobs—four percent of its total workforce—over the next four years. As it does for so many Big Pharma players, the patent cliff lies at the heart of the issue. AstraZeneca products scheduled to lose patent protection this year are Armidex, a breast cancer therapy; and Pulmicort Respules, an asthma treatment. Part of the trouble for drug manufacturers is the looming patent expiration dates and impending generics competition. Three of Sanofi’s top products—anticlotting medicines Lovenox and Plavix and cancer drug Taxotere—have or will soon have new generic competition, jeopardizing nearly $10 billion of the company’s $40 billion in annual sales, according to a story on Yahoo! Finance. There are several other factors that are contributing to the layoffs trend: • Structural transformations in the marketplace, focused on the declining relevance of a large sales force in an era of managed care as well as more targeted high-yield approaches to drug development that require less dedicated staff for R&D operations. • Redeployment of assets in line with globalization and the ability to dig deep in untapped growth markets. Job losses in the US and Europe mean that more workers can be hired in countries like China—where, for example, turnover among sales forces is quite high and needs frequent replenishment. • Advances in information technology that improve productivity for a smaller workforce. Information is not only a strategic asset; it is a labor-saving instrument to replace back-office functions and support more automation in manufacturing. • The high cost of producing biologicals drugs are forcing companies to be more selective in where they manufacture, with fewer plants staffed by fewer people with more skills. While such redistribution of assets and focus on greater ROI can be positive for a company as a whole, it can have negative effects on individual workers. In an industry that was once thought to be immune to layoffs, the dynamic can change if workers become wary of job loss, shifting toward a culture of bureaucratic self-preservation that may not always be in line with the importance of fostering entrepreurialism and prudent risk taking. |
金蟲 (正式寫手)
每年都拖平均工資的后腿

銅蟲 (初入文壇)
鐵桿木蟲 (正式寫手)
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +3 | ytter 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +3 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0805 316求調(diào)劑 +3 | 大雪深藏 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 北道巷 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 313求調(diào)劑 +4 | 肆叁貳壹22 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +9 | 申子申申 2026-03-19 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +3 | 余意卿 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +3 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 機械專碩299求調(diào)劑至材料 +3 | kkcoco25 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +6 | △小透明* 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學(xué),080502,354分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 守候夕陽CF 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +7 | 司空. 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿:南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩,總分289分 +4 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 中南大學(xué)化學(xué)學(xué)碩337求調(diào)劑 +3 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程348求調(diào)劑 +3 |  ̄^ ̄゜汗 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 324分 +10 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 【同濟軟件】軟件(085405)考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2026eternal 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +4 | 八6八68 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩274一志愿211求調(diào)劑 +6 | 薛云鵬 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小賈同學(xué)123 2026-03-15 | 8/400 |
|