| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1211 | 回復(fù): 6 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
machi188新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
審稿意見返回,大家?guī)涂纯催有接受的可能嗎? 已有6人參與
|
||
|
We regret to advise you that your manuscript has not been accepted for publication in Optics Express. The reviewer comments are included below. Reviewer 1 > > > > This article has many deficiencies. A few of them are > > listed above. This article can not be published in Optics > > Express. > > > > - English usage > > - lack of important references > > - confusion between y-axis and z-axis (in Fig. 1, for > > instance) > > - confusion in the geometrical parameters : the period is > > 'Lambda' in section 2 and in the beginning of section 3, 'T' > > in the following (eq. (9)), and 'd' in the description of > > the Fabry-Perot-like model. > > - the description of RCWA method is well known and useless > > - the parameters of the Drude model for silver are not > > given > > > > Even more importantly, I believe that the definition of the > > wave-vector kz of the Fabry-Perot model is wrong (page 6). 重看了自己的論文,果然犯了最后一條意見的錯(cuò)誤, 如果根據(jù)意見重改, OE接受的可能有多大? |
金蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專家
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|