 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5214 | 回復(fù): 23 | ||||||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||||||
linhengjie鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
Nature發(fā)文：國際頂級(jí)作者和雜志編輯教您如何更有效的寫作和發(fā)表論文 已有21人參與
|
|||||||
|
本文轉(zhuǎn)自丁香園：http://www.dxy.cn/bbs/topic/1893 ... 6rONSzpAWxUHjUkc-20 Publications: Publish like a pro Journal name: Nature Volume: 467, Pages: 873–875 Year published: (2010) DOI: doi:10.1038/nj7317-873a 全文見附件（下載地址在最下面）本文可謂論文寫作和發(fā)表秘籍的精華版，國際頂級(jí)投稿人，審稿人和編輯從他們各自的角度言簡意賅的講授了論文寫作和發(fā)表的技巧和要點(diǎn)，讀了之后，感覺非常實(shí)用、給力，收獲頗豐，現(xiàn)將全文小結(jié)如下，以便大家學(xué)習(xí)： 寫文章 1. The moral of the story is that the publishing process requires not only hard work but also resilience — and struggling young authors can learn valuable lessons from those who have already navigated that process. 2. You are only as good as your last paper — previous success does not guarantee future acceptance. 3. A key to winning over editors and reviewers is having strong data to support conclusions. Some people don't appreciate the fact that a lot of weak data does not make up for having less, but more powerful, data. 4. Authors should try to resist the urge to let their findings trickle out over many years and many papers. 5. Younger writers need to recognize their own working patterns and write when they are most productive — whether it is early morning, late at night, at a desk or during a walk. 6. Recognizing that writing is a long process is valuable. Find a mentor in that process, somebody to guide and coach you. 7. For many publishing veterans, the writing process starts at the earliest stages of designing a research project. 8. Aspiring writers should have a template to hand — a previous paper published by the lab or a 'near-neighbour' article from the same journal. Paralysed would-be writers should take the template concept one step further by counting the number of paragraphs in each section, the number of figures and the number of references. 9. Start every day of writing by editing the previous day's material — a useful tactic that helps to ease us into a writing mindset. 10. The usual writing advice applies to manuscript writing as well — be clear and concise and use simple language whenever possible. 11. Editors stress the importance of clarity above all else, to help convey arguments and logic to them and to readers. 12. You've got to hook the editor with the abstract. 13. Most writers make the mistake of assuming too much knowledge on the part of their audience. 14. Editors say that one way to identify holes or gaps in logic that would be vulnerable in peer review is to imagine a sceptical audience reading the manuscript. Think of the most adversarial reader you can imagine, and write to substantiate the veracity of your arguments and to anticipate criticisms and answer them. 15. Some editors suggest that 'winning over' a sceptical editor, reader or reviewer should be the ultimate goal of any paper's abstract. 16. Editors read the abstract and start formulating a thumbs-up or thumbs-down, looking for reasons to rip it apart. 17. Authors should avoid an abstract structure that says: we did X, which told us Y, and has implications for Z. Instead, he says, start with why a reader should care about learning more about Z and then explain how this work furthers that goal. 18. The introduction should persuade readers “that you know what you are talking about and have something new to teach them. 19. Authors should clearly distinguish between data in the results section and inferences about what they mean in the discussion section. 20. The introduction need not cite every background article gathered, the results section should not archive every piece of data ever collected, and the discussion is not a treatise on the paper's subject. 21. The writer must be selective, choosing only the references, data points and arguments that bolster the particular question at hand. 22. Once a first draft is complete, the work has only just begun. “Revise and revise and revise.” Even polished authors go through an average of 10–12 drafts, and sometimes as many as 30. 23. Writers should ask not only the principal investigator to view drafts, but also every co-author, as well as fellow students or postdocs, and colleagues outside the immediate field of research. Lead authors should give co-authors set deadlines of 10 days to two weeks to suggest changes. Experienced authors counsel letting the draft sit for a few days before reading it with fresh eyes to catch mistakes or problems in flow. It is better to read drafts aloud with your students to spot errors. 24. Authors should not suggest reviewers who are personal friends or institutional colleagues; including those people could immediately erode the editor's trust. Authors need to find a balance — it is fine to exclude a couple of reviewers who are direct competitors or known naysayers, but restricting too many qualified reviewers can backfire. 25. As an author, your job is to make the editor's job as easy as possible. 選雜志 1. Before starting to write the paper, authors should carefully choose a journal audience for their research story — and initially aim for the highest-impact, highest-profile journal possible. The submission process is fast enough today; it's worth the effort of sending your paper to the highest journals where it belongs. 2. Established authors and journal editors suggest thinking early about the right journal and finding an appropriate editor, the best reviewers and, of course, an appropriate audience of readers. 修稿 1. New authors can feel overwhelmed when the reviewers' comments come back. Wojtal likes to let reviews sit for a week to let his “blood pressure return to normal”. 2. Blumberg advises copying all of the reviewers' comments into a new electronic document to address each one step-by-step. 3. Authors should work through the list and explain how criticisms were addressed, or why they were not, in the resubmission cover letter to the editor. 4. A clear, succinct resubmission letter may result in an editor making their own decision rather than sending the paper back out for another round of review. 5. New authors should be careful to polish their work and respond meticulously and politely to reviewers' comments without getting overwhelmed or frustrated by lengthy, time-consuming queries. Those who follow such advice are more likely to find success. Those who don't could end up on the wrong side of the 'publish or perish' divide. 6. The worst thing an author can do is to ignore a reviewer's criticism and send it back without an explanation. This wastes an editor's time trying to resolve the issue on his or her own. 7. “If you strongly believe the reviewers have erred and that the editor should hear from you, definitely send an e-mail,” says Blumberg, who, as an editor, is happy to hear from authors. “Be as polite as possible, stick to the facts, and keep it to the point.” 結(jié)束語 Young scientists would be wise to embrace written communication as the foundation of an academic career and the key to earning tenure, winning funding and, ultimately, sustaining a research programme, says Hauber. “If your result is not published, you haven't done anything,” he says. “You might not set out to be an enthusiastic writer, but you should try to learn to love it.” 呵呵！最后，您若感覺給力有點(diǎn)收獲那就麻煩投我一票吧！會(huì)給您帶來好運(yùn)的！ 原文納米盤地址： Publications Publish like a pro.pdf (408.79k) http://d.namipan.com/d/aa1fbcea1 ... 2b982c6b46025630600 [ Last edited by linhengjie on 2010-12-10 at 20:02 ] |
回復(fù)此樓» 收錄本帖的淘帖專輯推薦
 有價(jià)值的帖子 | 一縷陽光 | 論文寫作與投稿 | Nature Communication |
| 大雜燴 |
» 本帖已獲得的紅花（最新10朵）
kanebo2008» 猜你喜歡
材料考研調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
270調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
275學(xué)碩081000服從調(diào)劑到其他專業(yè)，保不住本專業(yè)了
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
0710生物學(xué)，325求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
296材料專碩求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
385分 生物學(xué)（071000）求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
377求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
【求調(diào)劑】新能源材料本科，一志愿211，初試321
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
316求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
321求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)商家推薦: (我也要在這里推廣)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 沒有送審，編輯說超出雜志范圍，請(qǐng)大家?guī)兔纯矗?/a>
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 分享今日最新Nature文章：10nm以下金屬納米顆粒的等離子共振研究
已經(jīng)有371人回復(fù)
- 近十年機(jī)械工程學(xué)科美國學(xué)者SCI發(fā)文居前100位期刊
已經(jīng)有34人回復(fù)
- 大連化物所用CVD方法能得到大面積、單層、單晶石墨烯，報(bào)道在Nature上
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- CSC表格的論文一欄，全填滿SCI還是填上一些頂級(jí)會(huì)議比較好？（計(jì)算機(jī)科學(xué)）
已經(jīng)有20人回復(fù)
- 金屬所新發(fā)表一篇Nature---關(guān)于石墨烯
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- 近十年化學(xué)學(xué)科中國學(xué)者SCI十大發(fā)文期刊
已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
- 如何在《Nature》雜志上發(fā)表文章(經(jīng)典 已搜索無重復(fù))【轉(zhuǎn)載】
已經(jīng)有103人回復(fù)
- 美國分析化學(xué)雜志編輯對(duì)論文寫作的忠告
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 環(huán)境類期刊發(fā)文記錄
已經(jīng)有22人回復(fù)
- 如何在頂級(jí)科學(xué)雜志上發(fā)表論文.2 -魯白(ZZ)
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 【分享】如何在頂級(jí)科學(xué)雜志上發(fā)表論文(doc)【已搜索無重復(fù)】
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
linhengjie
鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
 |
4樓2010-12-19 00:31:24
visitor958
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專家
- 應(yīng)助: 2283 (講師)
- 貴賓: 0.05
- 金幣: 17310
- 散金: 2544
- 紅花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在線: 2926.6小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 489254
- 注冊(cè): 2008-01-01
- 專業(yè): IEEE
3樓2010-12-11 11:28:45
xiare80
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 3 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1240.3
- 散金: 1540
- 紅花: 5
- 帖子: 944
- 在線: 444.2小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 933287
- 注冊(cè): 2009-12-25
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 固體力學(xué)
hehe,ding yixia 
9樓2010-12-19 09:22:47
wuwt
木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 2786.5
- 散金: 218
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 743
- 在線: 227.1小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 585360
- 注冊(cè): 2008-08-08
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): polymer
14樓2011-01-19 06:42:40
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070305高分子化學(xué)與物理 304分求調(diào)劑 +14 | c297914 2026-03-28 | 14/700 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +5 | 勇敢的小吳 2026-04-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 310求調(diào)劑 +11 | 爭取九點(diǎn)睡 2026-03-30 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 +8 | 呢呢妮妮 2026-04-01 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 295材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +19 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 19/950 |
|
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +5 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 266分求材料化工冶金礦業(yè)等專業(yè)的調(diào)劑 +7 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +12 | 小熊～～ 2026-03-31 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +10 | 李芷新1 2026-03-31 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華南師范361分，化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +4 | Nicole88888 2026-04-01 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +4 | 崽崽仔 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南師大0703化學(xué) 275求調(diào)劑 +5 | Ripcord上岸 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 本2一志愿C9-333分，材料科學(xué)與工程，求調(diào)劑 +9 | 升升不降 2026-03-31 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085601英二數(shù)二求調(diào)劑 總分325 +4 | 余航航 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856 335分 +9 | cccchenso 2026-03-29 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 本科211安全工程，初試290分，求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2719846834 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 抱歉 +3 | 田洪有 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿雙一流機(jī)械285分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 幸運(yùn)的三木 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑 +4 | 種圣賜 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|