| 查看: 4108 | 回復(fù): 71 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章收到審稿意見,散金幣贊人品
|
|||
|
愛思維爾的期刊,我們專業(yè)的標(biāo)桿性雜志,編輯給的是revise,不過審稿人感覺給的修改量還是不小的。大伙看看審稿人的態(tài)度?大家別光顧著拿金幣,給點實際的看法 Dear Professor **, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jijr/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Please proceed to the following link to update your personal classifications and keywords, if necessary: Yours sincerely, ** ** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper suggests new GAX cycle. Totally, You need more explanations for your results. Please revise the paper followed by the comments. 1. Chapter 2 It is difficult to understand the GAX cycle only from the schematic flow. Show us the driving state point using such as schematic during diagram and so on. 2. Chapter 3 In assumptions, you show simulation conditions, too. In current situation, it is difficult to know what are simulation conditions. Please show us the simulation conditions separately. 3. Chapter 3 Your model only considers the mass and heat balance. Don't you have to consider the pressure drop for refrigerant line? 4. Chapter 5 You need more figures to explain your results -temperatures, pressures, heat transfer rates and concentraitons and so on-. Only from the results of the mass flow rates, it is difficult to understand the advantage of your new cycle. 5. New cycle seems to be too complex. Can you actually realize this cycle? Reviewer #2: This paper proposed an improved GAC cycle to utilize low grade absorption heat, and obtained 20% higher COP than the SGAX cycle. However, the authors should clarify the validation of the model in more detail. The author just compared the COPs from the literature. They must validate it by experimental results or thermal conditions including T, P, x and the COP from the litertaure. [ Last edited by longzai on 2011-1-20 at 08:51 ] |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+2/100
+1/86
+1/84
+1/81
+1/72
+1/51
+1/49
+1/38
+1/32
+1/23
+1/22
+1/15
+1/9
+1/9
+1/6
+1/5
+1/4
+1/4
+1/3
+1/1
版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)








| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料與化工(0856)304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +5 | 十三加油 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求助 +5 | 夢里的無言 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料 271求調(diào)劑 +5 | 展信悅_ 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 336求調(diào)劑 +5 | rmc8866 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +5 | shxchem 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 26考研一志愿中國石油大學(xué)(華東)305分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 嘉年新程 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)一志愿985,分?jǐn)?shù)349求調(diào)劑 +3 | zxts12 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +12 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-19 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學(xué)化學(xué)工藝專業(yè)(081702)315分求調(diào)劑 +12 | yangfz 2026-03-17 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研]
|
.6lL 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +7 | 司空. 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西安交通大學(xué) 學(xué)碩 354求調(diào)劑211或者雙一流 +3 | 我想要讀研究生 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工專碩調(diào)劑 +7 | heming3743 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085601材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +10 | 慕寒mio 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿福大288有機化學(xué),求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小木蟲200408204 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研調(diào)劑 +3 | xwt。 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +3 | p asserby. 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京大學(xué),080500材料科學(xué)與工程,調(diào)劑 +4 | Jy? 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085601材料工程315分求調(diào)劑 +3 | yang_0104 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|