| 13 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1957 | 回復(fù): 12 | ||||
[交流]
nanotechnology
|
|
07/02/2011 Manuscript for Board level decision In progress 31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 31/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received 11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee In progress 11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Report received 11/01/2011 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 15/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 13/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 01/12/2010 Original manuscript to referee Report received 29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 29/11/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report 請大家?guī)臀曳治鲆幌聽顩r |
decision in progress |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+5/890
+1/87
+1/81
+1/81
+1/67
+1/67
+1/50
+1/33
+1/31
+2/26
+1/11
+1/7
+1/7
+1/7
+1/6
+1/5
+1/5
+1/4
+1/3
+1/2
專家顧問 (知名作家)
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +373 |
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
|
第一 The fabrication method discussed in this work is not original and the quality of the work does not meet the standard of Nanotechnology. 第二: The work is a continuation of previous studies of the same group。 The presented results are interesting and provide new concepts for the fabrication of nanostuctures in solution. Therefore I recommend publication of the manuscript in Nanotechnology. However, before publication the manuscript needs severe correction of the English language as well as of many typos. 第三: In conclusion, publication of this paper in Nanotechnology is recommended after a minor, compulsory revision. [ Last edited by 天道酬勤 on 2011-2-8 at 19:02 ] |
|
Third referee's second report The paper was revised according to most of my previous comments. From the point of view of scientific contents, it deserves publication in Nanotechnology. However, the English must be carefully revised (as I asked in my previous report) because the text is plenty of mistakes. Many sentences have to be reformulated using a more correct English. A well written paper is always more pleasurable to read and has a higher impact. I think that a detailed correction of the text is beyond the assignments of the reviewer and the Authors should take care of this task |
| 13 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +4 | △小透明* 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +4 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 293求調(diào)劑 +6 | 世界首富 2026-03-11 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 有沒有道鐵/土木的想調(diào)劑南林,給自己招師弟中~ +3 | TqlXswl 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工 +4 | 安全上岸! 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +3 | lemonzzn 2026-03-16 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑,求各位老師收留 +8 | 秋有木北 2026-03-14 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +4 | 威化餅07 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[基金申請] 現(xiàn)在如何回避去年的某一個專家,不知道名字 +3 | zk200107 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料080500調(diào)劑求收留 +3 | 一顆meteor 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請]
有必要更換申報口嗎
20+3
|
fannyamoy 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +5 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑(材料與化工327) +4 | 愛吃香菜啦 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 球球古力 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 301求調(diào)劑 +6 | Liyouyumairs 2026-03-11 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 310求調(diào)劑 +3 | 【上上簽】 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +8 | 困于星晨 2026-03-12 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 工科調(diào)劑 +4 | Jiang191123! 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 270求調(diào)劑 085600材料與化工專碩 +3 | YXCT 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考博] 26讀博 +4 | Rui135246 2026-03-12 | 10/500 |
|