| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1408 | 回復(fù): 7 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
bird870306榮譽(yù)版主 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
澳洲自己對(duì)journal的評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)ending了哦 已有3人參與
|
||
|
剛剛收到的email,立馬就發(fā)上來(lái)了,貌似那個(gè) 澳洲自己的判定系統(tǒng)停止了。 之前發(fā)的那些個(gè)ranking,大伙不用再考慮了 Science Academy welcomes decision to drop ERA journal rankings The Australian Academy of Science welcomed today’s decision by the Government and the Australian Research Council to end the system of ranking academic journals as A*, A, B and C. The ranking system was a highly controversial component of the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) assessment of university disciplines. Science Minister Kim Carr today announced that the rankings system will end, giving more authority to the panels that examine and assess research activities undertaken around Australian universities on a discipline-by-discipline basis. Australian Academy of Science Secretary for Science Policy Professor Bob Williamson said the new approach is much more appropriate than bibliometric assessments of disciplines. “In our recent submission to the Australian Research Council, the Australian Academy of Science argued strongly that key areas such as interdisciplinary research and new research were seriously disadvantaged by journal ranking,” Professor Williamson said. “This affected not only areas of science and technology, but also interactions between the sciences and the humanities.” “It has been very distressing to see some universities using publications in highly ranked journals as the basis for funding, promotions, and even staff appointments. “The ranking of a journal as A* does not mean every paper in it is first rate, and some very good papers may appear in smaller journals. “People whose work is very relevant to Australian issues rather than internationally, and those in new fields or collaborating between several universities, have been particularly disadvantaged.” The Academy’s submission to the Australian Research Council (ARC) ERA consultation process earlier this year urged a move towards the type of peer-review system announced today. “We welcomed most features of the ERA, and today’s announcement has removed the single biggest problem,” Professor Williamson said. “The integrity of science relies upon this type of peer review. The Academy commends Minister Carr for recognising that this process also should be integral to assessing the quality of Australian research.” The Academy’s submission is available at www.science.org.au/reports/documents/era-submission%20.pdf Professor Williamson is available for comment until 7:15pm today on..... [ Last edited by bird870306 on 2011-5-30 at 14:44 ] |
榮譽(yù)版主 (著名寫手)
金蟲 (正式寫手)
金蟲 (正式寫手)
榮譽(yù)版主 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料科學(xué)與工程調(diào)劑 +5 | 深V宿舍吧 2026-03-30 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)354求調(diào)劑 +7 | 101次希望 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)308分調(diào)劑 +7 | 你好明天你好 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工272求調(diào)劑 +21 | 阿斯蒂芬2004 2026-03-28 | 21/1050 |
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +6 | 小懶蟲不懶了 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 085600,專業(yè)課化工原理,320分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 大饞小子 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料科學(xué)與工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 深V宿舍吧 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料化工調(diào)劑 總分330 +14 | zhubinhao 2026-03-27 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 305求調(diào)劑 +8 | RuiFairyrui 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 356求調(diào)劑 +3 | gysy?s?a 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 086000調(diào)劑 +3 | 7901117076 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085601 材料工程 313分 求調(diào)劑 +5 | Ong3 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +5 | Pigcasso 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 315調(diào)劑 +4 | 0860求調(diào)劑 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
鐘llll 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +4 | 柚柚yoyo 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京郵電大學(xué) 288分 材料考研 求調(diào)劑 +3 | jl0720 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 290分調(diào)劑求助 +3 | 吉祥止止陳 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 086003食品工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 淼淼111 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 080500求調(diào)劑 +3 | zzzzfan 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|