| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1974 | 回復(fù): 8 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
求助蟲友們幾個投稿后的問題,急!
|
||
|
各位蟲友你們好! 我去年12月份投了Chaos, Solitons & Fractals一篇文章,一月份給了第一次修改意見,我們修改后投上去,文章一直處于under review 狀態(tài),到了3月中旬又一次回來修改意見如下,大家給我分析一下,我這篇文章還有接受的希望嗎?我4月上旬修改后投上去,到現(xiàn)在還沒有任何消息,處于under review狀態(tài)。急死了,我年底畢業(yè),怕杯具了我就完了。畢業(yè)無望了。 這次修改意見如下: To my regret, I have to inform you that I cannot accept your manuscript in its current form for publication. Although the problem that you are addressing appears to be of interest to our readership, I feel that your work has not yet reached the level that would merit publication in a scientific journal of high standards. I am offering you the opportunity to resubmit your work when you feel that your work has reached its final form. If you decide to do so, please explain carefully how you have modified your work in the cover letter. Note that our Aims & Scope have been revised recently. They may be found on the journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chaos. Further manuscript guidelines can be found in the Guide for Authors, which is accessible from the journal homepage. I would like to take this occasion to thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Reviewer's comments It is unsatisfactory revision: The reference on the work by Jimbo, Kruskal and Miwa explains which variant of the Painleve' is used in the paper. The sense of this test is to prove that the singular expansions (5)--(8) do represent the general solution of Equation (4) in the sense of the Cauchy-Kowalevsky theorem, i.e., to prove that these expansions depends on a proper number of the arbitrary functions depending on one variable, t. When we arrive at Equation(14) we can count three arbitrary real-valued functions of variable t, which is not enough, further analysis is not clearly presented. Still there is inaccuracy in the presentatiion, say on page 5, it is written that $\phi(t)$ is "an arbitrary analytical function", on the same page just below Equation (8) under the analytical function the authors mean complex analytic functions, but in case $\phi(t)$ is complex, Equations (6) and (8) should contain complex conjugate of $\psi(t)$, rather than just $\psi(t)$. Actually these expansions are written correctly because the function $\phi(t)$ is real. The latter is important for a proper counting of the number of arbitrary functions in the singular expansions (6)--(8). Equation (15) is not fully investigated, because in the case $4+F=(9-(2k+1)^2)/4$, for any integer $k$, there appear additional resonances that are not analysed. Something is wrong in Equation (19), since it does not represent any condition. It follows from the paper that Equation (33) should also pass the Painleve' test. At the same time there is a paper: R. RADHAKRISHNAN, R. SAHADEVAN, and M. LARSHMANAN, Integrability and Singularity Structure of Coupled Nonlinear Schroedinger Equations, Chaos. Solitons & Fractals Vol. 5, No. 12, pp. 2315-2327, 1995. Where the authors performs, in Section 3, the Painleve' test (in a very similar manner as in the present paper under review, of Equation (33). They report some special conditions on the coefficients of the cubic nonlinearity. So, I think that the results should be compared and reported to the readers, why some discrepancy occurs? In view of the paper by Deng-Shan Wang, Da-Jun Zhang, and Jianke Yang, Integrable properties of the general coupled nonlinear Schrodinger equations, J MATH PHYS, v 51, 023510 (2010), there might be that the results of the paper cited above are too restrictive. I also call attention to the work by Xing Lu, Juan Li, Hai-Qiang Zhang, Tao Xu, Li-Li Li, and Bo Tian, Integrability aspects with optical solitons of a generalized variable-coefficient N-coupled higher order nonlinear Schrodinger system from inhomogeneous optical fibers, J Math Phys 51, 043511 (2010). Only after the comparison of the results with that work we can seriously consider the paper for publication. I call attention that much more is known about explicit solutions of the coupled NLSE, so there should be also corresponding references and comments. Actually, the concluding part of the paper, I mean the part below Equation (34), is also not clear since it contains some heuristic statements. In view of the above report, I see that the paper is not ready to be considered for publication and should be rejected because of the insufficient quality. Sure, in case the authors will be able to work out all questions mentioned above and they see that there is still something new to report, they are welcome to resubmit the paper. |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會議專家
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿085600中科院寧波所276分求調(diào)劑 +24 | 材料學(xué)257求調(diào)劑 2026-03-28 | 25/1250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +6 | 小懶蟲不懶了 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +4 | 想上學(xué)求調(diào) 2026-04-02 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0710生物學(xué),325求調(diào)劑 +3 | mkkkkkl 2026-04-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +8 | 薛定諤的虎。 2026-04-01 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 342求調(diào)劑 +12 | Mary Keen 2026-03-28 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)308分調(diào)劑 +13 | 你好明天你好 2026-03-30 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 0856,材料與化工321分求調(diào)劑 +13 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大085600,310分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 李瀟可 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 085410人工智能 初試316分 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 殘星拂曙 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +8 | 三水sss 2026-04-01 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0855機(jī)械初試280求調(diào)劑 +3 | kazenotori 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 288資源與環(huán)境專碩求調(diào)劑,不限專業(yè),有學(xué)上就行 +25 | lllllos 2026-03-30 | 26/1300 |
|
|
[考研] 375求調(diào)劑 +7 | 雨夏整夜 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +17 | land xuxu 2026-03-26 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿大連理工大學(xué),機(jī)械工程學(xué)碩,341 +3 | 西瓜田的守望者 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理 材料求調(diào)劑 +16 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-26 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩 085600求調(diào)劑 +7 | BBQ233 2026-03-30 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 本科雙非材料,跨考一志愿華電085801電氣,283求調(diào)劑,任何專業(yè)都可以 +6 | 芝士雪baoo 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 招收生物學(xué)/細(xì)胞生物學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | IceGuo 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|