| 查看: 5395 | 回復(fù): 11 | ||||||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 2 個(gè) QC強(qiáng)帖 ,點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | ||||||
[求助]
Gaussian 09 中溶劑化的熒光發(fā)射
|
||||||
|
Sample Text 在Gaussian 09 的計(jì)算熒光發(fā)射考慮了溶劑化效應(yīng)的算例中(如下所示),在7步計(jì)算中,各自讀取的chk文件分別是哪個(gè)啊?還有就是具體的“平衡溶解”和“非平衡溶解”是什么意思? 謝謝指導(dǎo),苦惱了好幾天的一個(gè)問題了,拿出來大家討論一下 Fluoresence example: Emission (Fluorescence) from First Excited State (n→π*) of Acetaldehyde Here we study the cycle: Acetaldehyde Excitation and Emission Cycle The primary process of interest is the emission, but this example shows how to study the complete cycle including the solvent effects. Step 1: Ground state geometry optimization and frequencies (equilibrium solvation). This is a standard Opt Freq calculation on the ground state including PCM equilibrium solvation. %chk=01-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) Opt Freq SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol) Acetaldehyde ground state 0 1 C C,1,RA X,2,1.,1,A O,2,RB,3,A,1,180.,0 X,1,1.,2,90.,3,0.,0 H,1,R1,2,A1,5,0.,0 H,1,R23,2,A23,5,B23,0 H,1,R23,2,A23,5,-B23,0 H,2,R4,1,A4,3,180.,0 RA=1.53643 RB=1.21718 R1=1.08516 R23=1.08688 R4=1.10433 A=62.1511 A1=110.51212 A23=109.88119 A4=114.26114 B23=120.56468 Step 2: Vertical excitation with linear response solvation. This is a TD-DFT calculation of the vertical excitation, therefore at the ground state equilibrium geometry, with the default solvation: linear response, non-equilibrium. We perform a single-point TD-DFT calculation, which defaults to non-equilibrium solvation. The results of this job will be used to identify which state or states are of interest and their ordering. These results give a reasonable description of the solvation of the excited state, but not quite as good as that from a state-specific solvation calculation. In this case, we see that the n->π* state is the first excited state. Next, we will use the state-specific method to produce a better description of the vertical excitation step. %chk=02-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) TD=NStates=6 SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol) Geom=Check Guess=Read Acetaldehyde: linear response vertical excited states 0 1 Step 3: State-specific solvation of the vertical excitation. This will require two job steps: first the ground state calculation is done, specifying NonEq=write in the PCM input section, in order to store the information about non-equilibrium solvation based on the ground state. Second, the actual state-specific calculation is done, reading in the necessary information for non-equilibrium solvation using NonEq=read. %chk=03-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol,Read) Geom=Check Guess=Read Acetaldehyde: prepare for state-specific non-eq solvation by saving the solvent reaction field from the ground state 0 1 NonEq=write --link1-- %chk=03-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) TD(NStates=6,Root=1) SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol,StateSpecific,Read) Geom=Check Guess=Read Acetaldehyde: read non-eq solvation from ground state and compute energy of the first excited with the state-specific method 0 1 NonEq=read Step 4: Relaxation of the excited state geometry. Next, we perform a TD-DFT geometry optimization, with equilibrium, linear response solvation, in order to find the minimum energy point on the excited state potential energy surface. Since this is a TD-DFT optimization, the program defaults to equilibrium solvation. As is typical of such cases, the molecule has a plane of symmetry in the ground state but the symmetry is broken in the excited state, so the ground state geometry is perturbed slightly to break symmetry at the start of the optimization. %chk=04-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) TD=(Read,NStates=6,Root=1) SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol) Geom=Modify Guess=Read Opt=RCFC Acetaldehyde: excited state opt Modify geometry to break Cs symmetry since first excited state is A" 0 1 4 1 2 3 10.0 5 1 2 7 -50.0 Step 5: Vibrational frequencies of the excited state structure. Now we run a frequency calculation to verify that the geometry located in step 4 is a minimum. The results could also be used as part of a Franck-Condon calculation if desired (see below). This is a numerical frequency calculation. %chk=05-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) TD=(Read,NStates=6,Root=1) Freq SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol) Geom=Check Guess=Read Acetaldehyde excited state freq 0 1 Step 6: Emission state-specific solvation (part 1). This step does state-specific equilibrium solvation of the excited state at its equilibrium geometry, writing out the solvation data for the next step via the PCM NonEq=write input. %chk=06-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) TD=(Read,NStates=6,Root=1) SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol,StateSpecific,Read) Geom=Check Guess=Read Acetaldehyde emission state-specific solvation at first excited state optimized geometry 0 1 NonEq=write Step 7: Emission to final ground state (part 2). Finally, we compute the ground state energy with non-equibrium solvation, at the excited state geometry and with the static solvation from the excited state. %chk=07-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol,Read) Geom=Check Guess=Read Acetaldehyde: ground state non-equilibrium at excited state geometry. 0 1 NonEq=read |
計(jì)算 | Gaussian學(xué)習(xí) | 經(jīng)驗(yàn) | 計(jì)算化學(xué) |
木蟲 (著名寫手)
瞌睡木蟲
|
我分析了一下那幾步的計(jì)算,的確第6步需要第4步的chk 第3步使用第1或第2步的都行 第6步和第7步計(jì)算是和第3步的兩個(gè)計(jì)算相對(duì)應(yīng),只不過第6/7步是發(fā)射,第3步是激發(fā),第6/7兩步得到的能量之差就是經(jīng)過指定態(tài)的溶劑化效應(yīng)校正之后的熒光發(fā)射能量,經(jīng)過轉(zhuǎn)換可以得到熒光的發(fā)射波長。 關(guān)于平衡和非平衡的問題是和statespecific計(jì)算有著不可分的關(guān)系的,你可以看一下下面的英文部分,這是我前一段時(shí)間從Gaussian官方技術(shù)顧問那里得到的詳細(xì)解釋,幾句話精練不出來,翻譯也要耗費(fèi)一段時(shí)間,你耐心讀一讀。 另外,如果你是用的是Gaussian 09 A.01或者A.02,請使用ExternalIteration或者SelfConsistent代替Statespecific選項(xiàng),因?yàn)楹笳哂悬c(diǎn)問題,如果是G09 B.01,用這三個(gè)選項(xiàng)之一都行,意義相同。 =========================================== The "StateSpecific" approach in this context applies to the excited state, and yes it involves solving self-consistently the "fast" component of the solvent polarization for the target state and non-equilibrium solvation for the "slow" component of the solvent polarization (i.e. the "slow" component of the solvent polarization comes from the origin state). The total polarization is always partitioned into two components, "slow" and "fast". The "slow" part can be regarded as the reorganization of the solvent molecules as a response to a change in the electronic density of the solute. The "fast" part can be regarded as the response of the electrons in the solvent to a change in the electronic density of the solute. For a change in the electronic density of the solute such as a vertical electronic transition, the "slow" component of the polarization is much slower than the timescale of the electronic transition, so the solvent does not have time to respond in this way to the vertical electronic transition. The "fast" component of the polarization, on the other hand, is closer in timescale to the vertical electronic transition on the solute. In an equilibrium solvation calculation, both components are in equilibrium with the solute's density. By default, all ground state calculations assume equilibrium solvation, as well as geometry optimizations of excited states (and also any calculation that involves the computation of the relaxed density of the excited state). Again, in equilibrium solvation processes, both the "slow" and "fast" component of the solvent polarization are in equilibrium with the excited state density. In the case of a TD energy calculation (no excited state density or geometry optimization) for the computation of a vertical electronic excitation, the default is to do a non-equilibrium process. For this case then, the "fast" component of the polarization "responds" to the change in the solute density from ground to excited state, but the "slow" component did not have time to "respond" so it still comes from the one that was in equilibrium with the solute's ground state density. This is the case of both "Step 2" and "Step 3" in the example shown in the manual. In "Step 2", an energy calculation using TD is performed, thus it defaults to non-equilibrium solvation. The solvation effects on the excited states energies are computed by means of a linear response approach. The absorption energies via the linear response approach only are those reported directly in the output of this "Step 2" job. In "Step 3", a step further is taken and a correction of the linear response excitation energy is performed by solving the "fast" component of the solvent polarization self-consistently with the selected excited state density (the "State-Specific" approach). This is generally an improvement over the excitation energies obtained by linear response alone. Note that since this "State-Specific" approach involves the calculation of the excited state density, the program would default to doing an equilibrium solvation calculation on the excited state. However, the goal of "Step 3" is to compute the vertical excitation energy, so as mentioned above, we would like to use the "slow" component of the solvent polarization from the ground state calculation (in "Step 3", the first part does an equilibrium calculation on the ground state saving the solvent reaction field to the checkpoint file) and solving self-consistently the "fast" component with the excited state density (the second part of "Step 3" reads the reaction field from the checkpoint file, the one from the ground state calculation, keeps the "slow" component as is, and solves the "fast" component self-consistently with the excited state density). The absorption energy via the "State-Specific" approach is the energy difference between the excited state energy after all PCM corrections from the non-equilibrium calculation in "Step 3" and the ground state energy resulting from the equilibrium process (either first part of "Step 3" or final, optimized geometry, energy from "Step 1", the two ground state energies should be the same). In a TD geometry optimization of an excited state, since one is looking for the equilibrium geometry, the default is to do equilibrium solvation, so the two components, "slow" and "fast", of the polarization are in equilibrium with the solute's excited state density. All "Step 4", "Step 5" and "Step 6" use equilibrium solvation for the selected excited state. The emission energy (vertical energy of the excited to ground state transition) by means of a linear response approach can be found in the output of "Step 4". For the final (optimized) geometry in "Step 4", the "excitation energy" shown in this output would be equal to the emission energy since it is the result of an equilibrium calculation on the selected excited state. "Step 6" and "Step 7" are analogous to the two parts of "Step 3" but this time for the opposite transition (excited to ground states). Thus, "Step 6" is analogous to the first part of "Step 3", it is an equilibrium calculation on the origin state (now the excited state) in which both "slow" and "fast" components of solvent polarization are solved self-consistently with the excited state density (this calculation can be regarded as a correction of the excited state energy beyond the linear response approach, which was done in "Step 4" . Now, this "Step 6" saves the solvent reaction field to the checkpoint file. "Step 7" reads this information from the file (just like the second part of "Step 3" and performs a non-equilibrium calculation of the ground state energy, using the "slow" component of the solvent polarization from the excited state calculation ("Step 6" and only doing the "fast" component of the solvent polarization self-consistent with the ground state density. The emission energy via the "State-Specific" approach would be the energy difference between the excited state energy after all PCM corrections from "Step 6" and the ground state energy resulting from the non-equilibrium process in "Step 7". |

木蟲 (著名寫手)
瞌睡木蟲
|
每一步計(jì)算分別使用前一步計(jì)算保存的chk文件,所以從第二個(gè)計(jì)算開始時(shí),你需要手動(dòng)將前一個(gè)計(jì)算chk文件復(fù)制一下,名字為新的計(jì)算的chk文件名。 關(guān)于平衡性和費(fèi)平衡性計(jì)算主要是涉及使用溶劑模型的激發(fā)態(tài)計(jì)算,具體區(qū)分如下。 SCRF計(jì)算中,溶質(zhì)被激發(fā)時(shí),溶劑會(huì)由于溶質(zhì)的狀態(tài)變化而被極化,其電子分布被改變,這是一個(gè)很快的過程,同時(shí)溶質(zhì)分子需要適應(yīng)這種改變(比如進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)動(dòng)、平動(dòng)等),但這是一個(gè)很慢的過程。此時(shí)計(jì)算就分為兩種: 平衡性計(jì)算:溶劑和溶質(zhì)有足夠的時(shí)間響應(yīng)變化,調(diào)整到比較平衡的狀態(tài);激發(fā)態(tài)的幾何優(yōu)化及使用了ExternalIteration技術(shù)的計(jì)算默認(rèn)使用平衡性計(jì)算。 非平衡性計(jì)算:近似描述因過程太快(比如電子的垂直激發(fā))使溶劑沒時(shí)間進(jìn)行響應(yīng)。激發(fā)態(tài)的單點(diǎn)計(jì)算默認(rèn)使用非平衡性計(jì)算。 |

|
還行向您咨詢一下,就是第5部只是激發(fā)態(tài)的頻率分析計(jì)算,起輔助作用,所以,第6步是不是應(yīng)該讀取的是第4步的chk文件? 相應(yīng)的,第3步是不是應(yīng)該先讀第1步的chk文件,因?yàn)樗鞍氩糠诌M(jìn)行的是基態(tài)的非平衡單點(diǎn)計(jì)算,說是保存了非平衡的溶劑反應(yīng)場,這一點(diǎn)也不是很明白,求解答。 第6步和7步具體是什么關(guān)系?第6步已經(jīng)做了激發(fā)態(tài)的發(fā)射,第7步做的是激發(fā)態(tài)結(jié)構(gòu)的單點(diǎn)嗎?6和7合起來好像和步驟3的兩部分是相照應(yīng)的,真的是暈了 謝謝,苦惱了好多天,解決后不勝感激 |
木蟲 (著名寫手)
瞌睡木蟲

銀蟲 (正式寫手)
送鮮花一朵 |
新手,有一個(gè)問題不明白,就是第四步進(jìn)行結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化,里面說到要打破對(duì)稱性, 是不是就是最后 “4 1 2 3 10.0 5 1 2 7 -50.0” 但是這個(gè)怎么確定呢? 先在此謝過· %chk=04-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) TD=(Read,NStates=6,Root=1) SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol) Geom=Modify Guess=Read Opt=RCFC Acetaldehyde: excited state opt Modify geometry to break Cs symmetry since first excited state is A" 0 1 4 1 2 3 10.0 5 1 2 7 -50.0 |
銀蟲 (正式寫手)
|
新手,有一個(gè)問題不明白,就是第四步進(jìn)行結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化,里面說到要打破對(duì)稱性, 是不是就是最后 “4 1 2 3 10.0 5 1 2 7 -50.0” 但是這個(gè)怎么確定呢? 先在此謝過· %chk=04-ac # B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) TD=(Read,NStates=6,Root=1) SCRF=(Solvent=Ethanol) Geom=Modify Guess=Read Opt=RCFC Acetaldehyde: excited state opt Modify geometry to break Cs symmetry since first excited state is A" 0 1 4 1 2 3 10.0 5 1 2 7 -50.0 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理-080500 材料求調(diào)劑 +6 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 362求調(diào)劑 +8 | 西南交材料專碩3 2026-03-31 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 354求調(diào)劑 +3 | lxb598 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 266分,求材料冶金能源化工等調(diào)劑 +8 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 085600 295分求調(diào)劑 +13 | W55j 2026-03-30 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 307分 求調(diào)劑 +8 | 不知道叫什么! 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 085600,專業(yè)課化工原理,320分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 大饞小子 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 抱歉 +4 | 田洪有 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料科學(xué)與工程 317求調(diào)劑 +7 | JKSOIID 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +5 | 小卡不卡. 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085601材料工程找調(diào)劑 +17 | oatmealR 2026-03-29 | 18/900 |
|
|
[考研] 0703 化學(xué) 求調(diào)劑,一志愿山東大學(xué) 342 分 +7 | Shern—- 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境科學(xué)與工程334分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 王一一依依 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +7 | 璞玉~~ 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料277求調(diào)劑 +7 | min3 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 藥學(xué)105500求調(diào)劑 +3 | Ssun。。 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | jhx777 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑 +7 | 青檸檬1 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +4 | 柚柚yoyo 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 309求調(diào)劑 +4 | gajsj 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|