| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3700 | 回復(fù): 5 | |||
tea_gl9871銅蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[求助]
有沒有蟲友被拒稿后寫過申訴信?急需指點一下!
|
|
求救各位蟲友: 事情是這樣,我的一篇英文文章4月初給了一個小修的意見,經(jīng)過4個月反反復(fù)復(fù)的修改(之前的帖子中也提到,主要是字詞和句子結(jié)構(gòu)的問題)今天給了最終意見,竟然是reject!哭。∥疫指望這篇文章畢業(yè)! 有幾個地方要說明的是, 1,第一次給我小修意見的編輯非此次reject我的主編。 2,第一次3個審稿人中沒有任何一個編輯質(zhì)疑我的實驗的方法和結(jié)論,只是主要對語法和句子結(jié)構(gòu)提出修改意見。尤其有兩個編輯都說寫的很好,值得發(fā)表。而現(xiàn)在該主編說我的方法有一定問題。這。。。 3,在3次反復(fù)修改過程中,與我溝通的執(zhí)行編輯前兩天還說他認(rèn)為可以接收了,結(jié)果主編。。。 4,是不是我拖得時間太長了對于一個小修來說? 5,請問有沒有蟲友有過類似經(jīng)歷,請有這樣經(jīng)歷的蟲友給我些指點該怎么辦。 我剛起草了一份申訴信,準(zhǔn)備直接對話reject的主編。這樣可否,有希望挽回結(jié)果嗎? 求助!求助!金幣全奉上,有這樣申訴信模板的多金幣感謝! 拒稿信原文: Dear xxx I have received all the materials related to your submission for final evaluation. I have noticed that together with the Associate Editor you have been working hard to improve the manuscript. Unfortunately, following examination of all the documents and the manuscript itself, I would like to inform you with great regret that I have not found enough arguments to recommend this work for publication in xxx. xxx is aiming to provide new and important data which will constitute at least incremental increase in our knowledge. As you have mentioned in your work, the protocol for in vitro procedures for this plant species has been elaborated some time ago. The structural observations, although interesting and well done, are not enough to warrant publication of such work. They are descriptive and cannot be used for generation of conclusions which will give us a glimpse into the mechanisms of axillary bud formation also in plants. As for the second part of this work, i.e. isoenzyme analysis, I am sorry to tell this, but this type of analysis is also not advancing our knowledge. As it is not supported by any other kind of biochemical, or immunochemical analyses, the conclusions you are drawing with respect to proposed functions of those enzymes are completely speculative and not rooted in solid data. I have noticed that stil this work requires quite a lot of editorial work with respect to sentence construction, typographics, and syntax. Please note also that the term "isozyme" relates to different forms of the same enzyme. Thus you cannot use the singular form such as e.g. "AMY isozyme" as this is biologically irrelevant. Summarising, I would like to thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work, but, with much regret, I have to reject it from further consideration. However, as the data are now nicely presented and relative well described, I do believe that you will publish them either in botanical journal or the one devoted to in vitro technology. With kind regards, |
納米金 石墨烯 介孔硅 SERS 拉曼 |
木蟲 (知名作家)
銅蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲之王 (文學(xué)泰斗)
小元
|
下面是寫的申訴信: Dear Professor ???: This is the second time for our manuscript titled ^^^^^to be submitted to Environmental Science & Technology in this week. The manuscript was rejected without sending out for review by the associated editor,^^^^. There is no believable reason in the decision letter for us to accept the conclusion. Firstly, (The novelty of my work^^^^^). We believe that our investigation is a good work with significant scientific meaning on the environmental remediation. Second, this is the third time that Prof. ??? has rejected our manuscripts. Although the reviewers required the revision manuscripts in the last two submissions of our previous work, he made the final reject decisions. This time he rejected our best work with unbelievable reason. Furthermore, some members of his group are carrying out the investigation on ???. Consequently, it is not appropriate to assign our manuscript to him. It is true that Prof. ??? is an expert. However, if there is a chance, we strongly hope that our manuscript will be assigned to any other associated editor but Prof. ??? . Sincerely yours |

木蟲之王 (文學(xué)泰斗)
小元
|
文章被拒之后的選擇 - 申訴,重投,改投? 很多新人會遇到這種問題,早就想發(fā)個貼,分享一下經(jīng)驗(本人被各種雜志拒過至少上百次,當(dāng)然最后也發(fā)了數(shù)十篇)。 投稿被拒是經(jīng)常的事,不必悲傷,馬上著手下一步。實際上如果每次都被接收,也許是應(yīng)該投到更高檔次的雜志。這里只簡單說一下被拒之后的選擇吧。歡迎大家補充。 申訴:沒有很大的原因(審稿人極不負(fù)責(zé),或收到了錯誤的審稿報告-比如審稿人上傳錯了文件),沒有必要申訴。申訴經(jīng)常只是耽誤時間,編輯也頭痛(審稿人不好找,編輯一般要站在審稿人一邊)。申訴的后果也是要等一段時間(可能很長,甚至有的編輯不理會申訴郵件,那你更難辦),申訴不成功幾率很大,即使成功了,也還是要修改重審(等于重投)。 重投:如果覺得文章適合這個雜志,可以修改重投,不必申訴。根據(jù)審稿人意見,修改重投。被拒的文章一般有大問題,應(yīng)該做很大改動(貢獻(xiàn)不足 - 要增加內(nèi)容,語言問題 - 好好修改,等等)。不過有時從文章結(jié)構(gòu),著重點方面,做適當(dāng)?shù)男薷,新的或原來的審稿人,都會認(rèn)真考慮。 改投:改投其它雜志是最常見的事。但改投并不應(yīng)該不做修改就換個雜志投,文章落到同一審稿人的情況很多,問題沒有處理就改投給審稿人印象很不好。改投不一定什么都改,但要做適當(dāng)?shù)男薷,突出適合新雜志的重點。當(dāng)然,不是每次被拒,就只能投個低一檔次的雜志。如果文章不錯,被拒原因是內(nèi)容不適合,那有時投同一級別,甚至更高的,都可以。 除了這三種選擇,有時還要冷靜一下,看看文章的質(zhì)量和潛力夠不夠投雜志。不夠的話,不要硬投,考慮一下是否先投個會議;蛟S放一放,先做點別的工作或研究,過一段時間在回來看看,可能有不少新的內(nèi)容了。 |

木蟲之王 (文學(xué)泰斗)
小元

| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 一志愿哈工大總分298分,前三科223分 +5 | dongfang59 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +7 | 嗯滴的基本都 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 295材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料化工調(diào)劑 總分330 +10 | zhubinhao 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 零八# 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +4 | Sanmu-124 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑,一志愿南農(nóng)083200食品科學(xué)與工程 +5 | XQTJZ 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 305求調(diào)劑 +5 | 哇盧卡庫 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
孅華 2026-03-22 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 314求調(diào)劑 +3 | 溪云珂 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +8 | zhn03 2026-03-25 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 +7 | α____ 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +15 | Zhao anqi 2026-03-22 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] B區(qū)考研調(diào)劑 +4 | yqdszhdap- 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑,求導(dǎo)師收 +7 | 天天好運來上岸?/a> 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 277分求調(diào)劑,跨調(diào)材料 +3 | 考研調(diào)劑lxh 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | ALULU4408 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
|
2117205181 2026-03-21 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿海大,0703化學(xué)學(xué)碩304分,有大創(chuàng)項目,四級已過 +6 | 幸運哩哩 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|