| 10 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2943 | 回復: 9 | ||
[求助]
文章被拒了,編輯希望我重投,幫忙看下重投有希望嗎?
|
|
投了biochemical engineering journal的文章,被拒絕了。大家看看我重投還有戲嗎?編輯意見如下。呃~明說一下,由于是第一次投文章,背景部分參考文獻什么的寫的是挺次的... Thank you for submitting your manuscript for consideration for publication in the BEJ. This manuscript addresses a very interesting topic for the BEJ. However, in its present form it does not have sufficient novelty or impact to consider it as a significant contribution to biochemical engineering. Therefore, I must reject your manuscript. Additional comments are provided below. Although this will be a disappointing outcome, I would encourage you to consider submitting a new manuscript to address the issues raised below. If you decide to resubmit in this way you will need to make an entirely new submission. However, in your new submission cover letter you should indicate the manuscript number of your original submission and explain in detail how you have addressed the comments below. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, William M. Miller Editor Biochemical Engineering Journal Additional comments: The authors must directly compare their results for rhamnolipid production for the different process modifications with those reported by other investigators. Specific comparisons should be made in terms of the extent and rate of cell growth and rhamnolipid production. The authors should also compare their results with those for other similar fermentations, as well as for other modeling studies. The authors must clearly describe what is novel and of high impact in their work. The approaches used seem relatively standard and the models used are well established. Why would this work be of interest to readers of the BEJ? The Results and Discussion section has no citations of other published studies. Since biosurfactant fermentation is an active area of research, I would expect the authors to compare their results with those from many other studies. Surprisingly, only 17 references are cited with 3 from 2007 and more recent. Given the very active nature of this field, I would expect the authors to cite many more recent studies. Finally, few of the cited references are from the Biochemical Engineering Journal or other journals that focus on biochemical engineering. This will decrease interest in the paper by readers of the BEJ. |

至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
超哥

用戶注銷 (正式寫手)
金蟲 (小有名氣)

|
本帖內容被屏蔽 |
金蟲 (正式寫手)

木蟲 (正式寫手)

銀蟲 (正式寫手)
潛水黨

木蟲 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (小有名氣)
| 10 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 268求調劑 +7 | 好運連綿不絕 2026-03-12 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 268求調劑 +8 | 一定有學上- 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 344求調劑 +4 | knight344 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調劑 +3 | p asserby. 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工專碩調劑 +5 | heming3743 2026-03-16 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿,福州大學材料專碩339分求調劑 +3 | 木子momo青爭 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
|
zhouzhen654 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學調劑 +6 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-15 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調劑 +5 | 大米飯! 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調劑 +6 | ytter 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研]
|
笨笨兔子 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 26考研一志愿中國石油大學(華東)305分求調劑 +3 | 嘉年新程 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調劑 +4 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-14 | 6/300 |
|
|
[基金申請] 現(xiàn)在如何回避去年的某一個專家,不知道名字 +3 | zk200107 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調劑 +4 | 學海漂泊 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 工科調劑 +4 | Jiang191123! 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[論文投稿]
投稿問題
5+4
|
星光燦爛xt 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 270求調劑 085600材料與化工專碩 +3 | YXCT 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調劑(食品/專碩) +3 | xc321 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調劑 +3 | 152697 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|