| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 4231 | 回復(fù): 19 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
guoyuming金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
[交流]
JACS全文投稿一個(gè)半月,無(wú)消息 已有17人參與
|
||
|
8月底投了一篇全文到JACS,8月31日主編將文章分到了Yang Peidong手里,到現(xiàn)在快一個(gè)半月了,沒(méi)有任何消息,擔(dān)心中,有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的蟲(chóng)蟲(chóng)說(shuō)說(shuō)看什么情況呀,審稿時(shí)間是不是有點(diǎn)兒長(zhǎng)了呀,現(xiàn)在敢發(fā)信問(wèn)嗎 審稿結(jié)果已經(jīng)收到,杯具了!一共四個(gè)審稿人,第一個(gè)要求大修,第二、三個(gè)要求小修,第四個(gè)審稿人拒了(他似乎對(duì)我們的研究體系持保留態(tài)度,從意見(jiàn)中可以推測(cè)出該審稿人是誰(shuí),我們的研究體系與該審稿人之前的研究體系有所不同),下面附上簡(jiǎn)單的審稿結(jié)果: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Reconsider after major revisions. Significance: High (suitable for JACS) Novelty: High (suitable for JACS) Broad interest: High (suitable for JACS) Scholarly presentation: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In Part Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: No Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: In Part Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish in JACS after minor revisions. Significance: High (suitable for JACS) Novelty: High (suitable for JACS) Broad interest: High (suitable for JACS) Scholarly presentation: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In Part Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: In Part Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Publish in JACS after minor revisions. Significance: High (suitable for JACS) Novelty: High (suitable for JACS) Broad interest: High (suitable for JACS) Scholarly presentation: High (suitable for JACS) Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: In Part Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: Yes Reviewer: 4 Recommendation: Publish elsewhere. Significance: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Novelty: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Broad interest: High (suitable for JACS) Scholarly presentation: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In Part Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes Do the contents justify the length of this manuscript?: Yes [ Last edited by guoyuming on 2011-11-3 at 13:11 ] |
至尊木蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
Rainman

新蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|