| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1275 | 回復(fù): 3 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個(gè) 翻譯EPI ,點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
yongbinz金蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
|
[求助]
150金幣急求高手幫忙翻譯一段話,漢譯英,謝絕軟件翻譯!
|
||
|
要獲得高的剝離強(qiáng)度,除了薄膜與銅良好的界面作用外,還需要薄膜具有較高的內(nèi)聚強(qiáng)度。A的低剝離強(qiáng)度產(chǎn)生的原因正是因?yàn)槠漭^低的內(nèi)聚強(qiáng)度。此處“內(nèi)聚強(qiáng)度”與“拉伸強(qiáng)度”兩個(gè)概念并不完全相同。因?yàn),薄膜的拉伸?qiáng)度是薄膜沿薄膜平面的破壞強(qiáng)度,而剝離時(shí)的內(nèi)聚強(qiáng)度則主要是垂直于薄膜平面方向的破壞強(qiáng)度。通常的薄膜都存在分子鏈沿薄膜平面的較大程度的取向,因此,兩個(gè)方向的強(qiáng)度不能等同,這也就是說(shuō),PI3的拉伸強(qiáng)度大并不表示剝離時(shí)其內(nèi)聚強(qiáng)度就大。而薄膜與銅箔界面附近存在的“弱邊界層”會(huì)加劇薄膜在這一區(qū)域的內(nèi)聚強(qiáng)度與本體拉伸強(qiáng)度的差別。因此,此處只能說(shuō)明邊界區(qū)域的內(nèi)聚強(qiáng)度小而不能說(shuō)其拉伸強(qiáng)度小。 [ Last edited by yongbinz on 2011-11-25 at 21:13 ] |
| To obtain high peel strength, it is necessary to improve both the bonding strength of film/copper at the interface and the cohesive strength of film itself in the boundary layer near the interface. The cause of the weak peel strength for A should be the low cohesive strength of the film. The tensile strength of the film reflected the fracture strength on in-plane direction, wheras the cohesive strength presented the shear strength on out-of-plane direction. Therefore, in this article the tensile strength of the film on in-plane orientation was not identical to the cohesive strength of the film on out-plane orientation. Further, the existence of the “weak boundary layer” near the interface might cause higher difference between the cohesive strength and tensile strength. In short, thei film with the excellent tensile strength may not necessarily have a high peel strength value. |

榮譽(yù)版主 (知名作家)
笑熬漿糊——滿腦漿糊
|
Inorder to obtain high peel strength, not only a better interfacial bond strength between the thin films and the copper but also a higher cohesive strength of such films are neccessary. The cause of the weak peel strength for A should be its lower cohesive strength. The cohesive strength reffered herein is completely different from the tensile strength which is a kind strength that related to the breaking of surface which is parallel to the surface, whereas cohesive strength is mainly based on the vertical breaking strength of the film. Generally speaking, the molecules of the film are to a greater extent orientated along with the surface direction, which suggests that the strength along with these two directions is different. The higher tensile strength of PI3 thereby can not illustrate its higher cohesive strength. However, there is weak interfacial layer between the thin films and the copper which might cause higher difference between values of cohesive strength and tensile strength in such region. In short, it could merely indicate that the cohesive strength of boundary region is weak instead of its tensile strength. 僅供參考,希望對(duì)你有所幫助。 |

新蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
| To obtain a high peel strength, in addition to a good interface with the copper film role, but also need to have a higher film cohesive strength. A low peel strength causes precisely because of its low cohesive strength. Here "cohesive strength" and "tensile strength" two concepts are not identical. Because the tensile strength of the film along the film plane of the film breaking strength, and peel strength when the cohesion of the film is mainly in the plane perpendicular to the direction of the breaking strength. Usually the molecular chain of the film there is a greater degree along the film plane orientation, therefore, can not be the same strength in both directions, which means that, PI3 does not mean that the tensile strength of its cohesive strength when peeling big. The copper thin film near the interface with the existence of "weak boundary layer" will film in the region increased cohesive strength and bulk tensile strength difference. Therefore, here only shows that the cohesive strength of the boundary region is small and can not say that the tensile strength of small. |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +9 | 小熊joy 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)319求調(diào)劑 +4 | 錦鯉0909 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +8 | 一定有學(xué)上- 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +5 | 上岸的小葡 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專(zhuān)碩326求調(diào)劑 +6 | 墨煜姒莘 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | Zz版 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專(zhuān)碩274一志愿211求調(diào)劑 +6 | 薛云鵬 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[論文投稿] 有沒(méi)有大佬發(fā)小論文能帶我個(gè)二作 +3 | 增銳漏人 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +3 | Yy7400 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿985,本科211,0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù)319求調(diào)劑 +5 | Liwangman 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +5 | 素年祭語(yǔ) 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 070303一志愿西北大學(xué)學(xué)碩310找調(diào)劑 +5 | d如愿上岸 2026-03-12 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 277材料科學(xué)與工程080500求調(diào)劑 +3 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工 323 英一+數(shù)二+物化,一志愿:哈工大 本人本科雙一流 +4 | 自由的_飛翔 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 255求調(diào)劑 +3 | 李嘉慧, 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +3 | 5201314Lsy! 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調(diào)劑一志愿 985 總分 295 +8 | dream…… 2026-03-12 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 315求調(diào)劑 +9 | 小羊小羊_ 2026-03-11 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +7 | ADT 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿山大07化學(xué) 332分 四六級(jí)已過(guò) 本科山東雙非 求調(diào)劑! +3 | 不想理你 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|