 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 590 | 回復(fù): 3 | |||
gongtianyu鐵桿木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
Austerity vs. Europe
|
|
It is now increasingly clear that what started in late 2008 is no ordinary economic slump. Almost four years after the beginning of the crisis, developed economies have not managed a sustainable recovery, and even the better-off countries reveal signs of weakness. Faced with the certainty of a double-dip recession, Europe’s difficulties are daunting. Not only is Europe running the risk of lasting economic damage; high long-term unemployment and popular discontent threaten to weaken permanently the cohesiveness of its social fabric. And, politically, there is a real danger that citizens will stop trusting institutions, both national and European, and be tempted by populist appeals, as in the past. Europe must avoid this scenario at all costs. Economic growth must be the priority, for only growth will put people back to work and repay Europe’s debts. Understandably, there is a debate about how to achieve recovery. Advocates of austerity argue that debt has a negative impact on growth; proponents of further stimulus counter that it is low growth that generates public debt, not the other way around, and that austerity in times of recession only makes things worse. But Europeans do not have to agree on everything to find a common course. We can disagree about the long-term effects of liquidity injections, but we can all agree that it is not right to allow profitable companies to fail because credit markets are not working. We do not have to see eye to eye on fiscal policy to understand that it makes more sense to promote investment than to see our productive structure languish. And we all know that it is more cost-effective to invest in retraining the jobless than to allow long-term unemployment. In any case, doubts about the negative impact of austerity are becoming impossible to ignore. History shows that in a deep recession it is far more dangerous to withdraw economic stimulus too early than too late. An excessive cut in public spending in the current circumstances can lead to a contraction in growth, which is already happening: the International Monetary Fund now projects that the eurozone will shrink by 0.5% in 2012. Structural reforms are important to guarantee future sustainable growth, but they do not generate growth in the short term, which is what Europe needs. Instead, in exchange for meager progress on debt reduction, Europe risks causing lasting damage to its growth potential. Compared to a new recession, the long-term cost of stimulus policies is insignificant. In many countries, current budget deficits are the result not of reckless government overspending, but of temporary measures to deal with the crisis. With interest rates already low and the private sector deleveraging, there is little risk of expansionary policies causing inflation or crowding out private investment. By contrast, spending reductions could undermine economic activity and increase, not decrease, the public-debt burden. Public debt, moreover, should not be demonized. It makes financial sense for states to share the cost of public investments, such as infrastructure projects or public services, with future generations, which will also benefit from them. Debt is the mechanism by which we institutionalize intergenerational solidarity. The problem is not debt, but ensuring that it finances productive investment, that it is kept within reasonable limits, and that it can be serviced with little difficulty. Yet, ominously, the same arguments that turned the 1929 financial crisis into the Great Depression are being used today in favor of austerity at all costs. We cannot allow history to repeat itself. Political leaders must take the initiative to avert an economically driven social crisis. Two actions are urgently needed. At a global level, more must be done to address macroeconomic imbalances and generate demand in surplus countries, including developed economies like Germany. Surplus emerging-market economies must understand that a prolonged contraction in the developed world creates a real danger of a global downturn at a time when they no longer retain the room for maneuver that they had four years ago. Within the eurozone, structural reforms and more efficient public spending, which are essential to sustainable long-term growth and debt levels, must be combined with policies to support demand and recovery in the short term. The steps taken in this direction by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy are welcome but insufficient. What is needed is a grand bargain, with countries that lack policy credibility undertaking structural reforms without delay, in exchange for more room within the EU for growth-generating measures, even at the cost of higher short-term deficits. The world is facing unprecedented challenges. Never before in recent history has a deep recession coincided with seismic geopolitical change. The temptation to favor misguided national priorities could lead to disaster for all. Only enlightened political leadership can avert this outcome. European leaders must understand that adjustment programs have a social as well as a financial side, and that they will be unsustainable if those affected face the prospect of years of sacrifices with no light at the end of the tunnel. Austerity at all costs is a flawed strategy, and it will not work. We cannot allow a misconceived notion of “discipline” to cause lasting damage to our economies and inflict a terrible human toll on our societies. All of Europe must agree on a short-term growth strategy – and implement it quickly. |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
299求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
286分人工智能專業(yè)請求調(diào)劑愿意跨考！
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
279求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
336求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
286求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿華中科技大學(xué)071000，求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
279分求調(diào)劑 一志愿211
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
332求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
0856材料專碩353求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
材料學(xué)學(xué)碩080502 337求調(diào)劑-一志愿華中科技大學(xué)
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
gongtianyu
鐵桿木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 6568.5
- 紅花: 28
- 帖子: 357
- 在線: 355小時
- 蟲號: 956323
- 注冊: 2010-02-19
- 專業(yè): 創(chuàng)新管理
|
Understandably, there is a debate about how to achieve recovery. Advocates of austerity argue that debt has a negative impact on growth; proponents of further stimulus counter that it is low growth that generates public debt, not the other way around, and that austerity in times of recession only makes things worse. We can disagree about the long-term effects of liquidity injections, but we can all agree that it is not right to allow profitable companies to fail because credit markets are not working. We do not have to see eye to eye on fiscal policy to understand that it makes more sense to promote investment than to see our productive structure languish. And we all know that it is more cost-effective to invest in retraining the jobless than to allow long-term unemployment. Compared to a new recession, the long-term cost of stimulus policies is insignificant. In many countries, current budget deficits are the result not of reckless government overspending, but of temporary measures to deal with the crisis. With interest rates already low and the private sector deleveraging, there is little risk of expansionary policies causing inflation or crowding out private investment. By contrast, spending reductions could undermine economic activity and increase, not decrease, the public-debt burden. Public debt, moreover, should not be demonized. It makes financial sense for states to share the cost of public investments, such as infrastructure projects or public services, with future generations, which will also benefit from them. Debt is the mechanism by which we institutionalize intergenerational solidarity. The problem is not debt, but ensuring that it finances productive investment, that it is kept within reasonable limits, and that it can be serviced with little difficulty. Within the eurozone, structural reforms and more efficient public spending, which are essential to sustainable long-term growth and debt levels, must be combined with policies to support demand and recovery in the short term We cannot allow a misconceived notion of “discipline” to cause lasting damage to our economies and inflict a terrible human toll on our societies. |
2樓2012-01-31 00:49:05
winter_north
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- ESEPI: 113
- 應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 貴賓: 0.321
- 金幣: 5614.5
- 散金: 1975
- 紅花: 45
- 沙發(fā): 21
- 帖子: 4840
- 在線: 929.3小時
- 蟲號: 1567257
- 注冊: 2012-01-06
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 污染控制化學(xué)
3樓2012-01-31 06:22:13
 |
4樓2012-02-11 23:09:53
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 gongtianyu 的主題更新
| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 機械專碩299求調(diào)劑至材料 +3 | kkcoco25 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 083200學(xué)碩321分一志愿暨南大學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +3 | innocenceF 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 華東師范大學(xué)-071000生物學(xué)-293分-求調(diào)劑 +3 | 研究生何瑤明 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 西北大學(xué) ，070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩，總分287，雙非一本，求調(diào)劑。 +3 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武漢理工材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +9 | Doleres 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩297已過四六級求調(diào)劑推薦 +11 | adaie 2026-03-19 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 295材料求調(diào)劑，一志愿武漢理工085601專碩 +5 | Charlieyq 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +4 | Stella_Yao 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西安交通大學(xué) 學(xué)碩 354求調(diào)劑211或者雙一流 +3 | 我想要讀研究生 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩318求調(diào)劑 +5 | February_Feb 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程321分求調(diào)劑 +15 | 大米飯！ 2026-03-15 | 18/900 |
|
|
|
[考研] 334求調(diào)劑 +3 | 志存高遠(yuǎn)意在機?/a> 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +3 | 淇ya_~ 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] [導(dǎo)師推薦]西南科技大學(xué)國防/材料導(dǎo)師推薦 +3 | 尖角小荷 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 機械專碩325，尋找調(diào)劑院校 +3 | y9999 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 文思客 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉夢微 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 +4 | 奇點0314 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +4 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-14 | 6/300 |
|