版塊導(dǎo)航: 正在加載中...

登錄注冊

應(yīng)《網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未進(jìn)行實(shí)名認(rèn)證將不得使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)跟帖服務(wù)。為保障您的帳號(hào)能夠正常使用，請盡快對帳號(hào)進(jìn)行手機(jī)號(hào)驗(yàn)證，感謝您的理解與支持！

24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜

返回列表

zhzimi_2007

木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 1759.3
散金: 50
帖子: 3631
在線: 703.6小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 450803
注冊: 2007-11-04
專業(yè): 應(yīng)用數(shù)學(xué)方法

引用回帖:

9樓: Originally posted by seapass at 2012-04-11 09:56:16:
那也很正常，兩次的審稿意見應(yīng)該不一樣了吧

我把最近的審稿意見發(fā)給您，您幫我看看：
Reviewer Comments:

Reviewer #1:

In my side of view this paper has some originality regarding to its application. Even, the author tries to mix different theories with each others, finally it give a bright-full results. However, I think there are lots of area that should be corrected and I think it was because of different amendments which were added to this paper after its first review.
1- The introduction is completely vast however it becomes to complicated while it just speak about history of the methods in details but it doesn't go through their application and definitions in general during introduction of the paper. I recommend author to re-structured the introduction and make it more readable for scholars.
2- It is a necessary to add a graphical chart at the end of introduction to avoid complication among history. the graphical chart should show the different areas that author mentioned about them and then it should illustrate the interactions and finally the contribution of this paper should be stared in the figure. It help to show the area of knowledge that author was explored in his study.
3- the contribution of this paper should be more highlighted at the end of introduction.
4- some small English errors should be corrected such as page one, line 48, in the middle, it should be "in recent years,..."
5- the structure of paper does not obey the standard form of normal academic papers, maybe some definitions should come under methodology, and results and discussions should be more highlighted rather than lots of complicated Remarks.
6- Since the strength of this paper is more in its application, it needs to be more strong on this issue. The examples should be more applied and even some example could be comparative example which shows any differences between this method and previous ones.
7- In page 3, Line 30, It is not suitable for academic paper to use "we"!
8- The procedure of this method should be illustrated by aid of graphical chart.
9- Conclusion should be more precise.
10- Using lots of references even at the end of the paper in remarks and results is not common and suitable at all. maybe they can be introduced as a significance of study in the introduction and at the end, the contributions should be mentioned alone.
11- Technically I like this mathematical solution in decision making. However, it will be so complicated for some scholars!

Reviewer #2:

The paper must be completely restructured.
Indeed, in its current form, the author presents:
- A set of definitions, remarks, examples, but without given textual explanations before giving the mathematical formulation.
- There are no apparent links between the different definitions, sections, etc. etc.
It should be important to:
- Explain with few words or in few lines, what is the contribution of the each definition.
- Propose the definitions with explanations, positioning, and links with what follow.
- Highlight the most important definitions to highlight the contribution of the author proportion.
On page 11, page where the author presents the proposal, we find a set of definitions, remarks and examples.
At page 11: It would be interesting that the author present the examples discussed by (Feng et al. 2010a) (Jiang et al. 2010a), and position its results regarding the obtained results by these authors. The goal is to have some elements of comparison.
Page 20: At the end of section 3 (proposed approach) there is no balance and the relationship between sections 3 and 4 (the author deal with 'Weighted interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based decision making', again without link, explanations .).
We must wait the page 25 for having explanations: the author explains the benefits of its proposition, but as he does not position this proposition regarding other examples (examples discussed in (Feng et al. 2010a) (Jiang et al. 2010a)) ? The interest is not highlighted.
At the end of page 25, the explanations are presented without giving links with the different definitions, remarks, examples (presented at the beginning of the paper) ? the benefit of the proposed approach is less visible.
It is also the case for 'Weighted interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based decision making' section. Moreover, the author does not position its proposition, without links .
A discussion on the types of problems that can be used with the proposed approach is important.
What about the following works: (Wang et al., 2009), (Zhang, 2011) regarding the proposed paper:
Zhoujing Wang, Kevin W. Li, Weize Wang, 2009, An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights. Information Sciences 179, 3026-3040.
Zhiming Zhang, 2011, A rough set approach to intuitionistic fuzzy soft set based decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling.

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

11樓2012-04-11 09:57:33

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

seapass

至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)

超哥

SEPI: 18
應(yīng)助: 772 (博后)
貴賓: 3.074
金幣: 16568.4
散金: 5496
紅花: 82
沙發(fā): 10
帖子: 3728
在線: 930.8小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 441856
注冊: 2007-10-27
性別: GG
專業(yè): 海洋環(huán)境科學(xué)

【答案】應(yīng)助回帖

★ ★ ★
zhzimi_2007: 金幣+2 2012-04-14 14:12:38
zhzimi_2007: 金幣+1 2012-04-14 14:14:21

文章確實(shí)有很大的問題。。。第一個(gè)審稿人給的意見都很具體有效，至少可以看出你文章結(jié)構(gòu)組織很有問題，單前沿你就寫得很不好，空泛，羅列一些前人研究，把別人看暈了，一定要突出主次，突出文章的要點(diǎn)。

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

獨(dú)上高樓。。。

12樓2012-04-11 10:16:03

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)

IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專家

應(yīng)助: 2283 (講師)
貴賓: 0.05
金幣: 17310
散金: 2544
紅花: 76
帖子: 15735
在線: 2926.6小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 489254
注冊: 2008-01-01
專業(yè): IEEE

【答案】應(yīng)助回帖

★ ★
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
zhzimi_2007: 金幣+2 2012-04-14 14:12:33

這個(gè)雜志，你認(rèn)真改幾次就可以了，不過一定要認(rèn)真。而且你要有耐心，這個(gè)雜志（有時(shí)）比較慢。

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

13樓2012-04-11 17:02:00

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

hupheng

鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)

應(yīng)助: 83 (初中生)
金幣: 5952.2
散金: 1
紅花: 8
帖子: 1392
在線: 293.3小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 103353
注冊: 2005-11-14
性別: GG
專業(yè): 金屬有機(jī)化學(xué)

【答案】應(yīng)助回帖

感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1

這可能是直接在編輯的手里就聚掉了

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

14樓2012-04-11 17:06:20

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

zhzimi_2007

木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 1759.3
散金: 50
帖子: 3631
在線: 703.6小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 450803
注冊: 2007-11-04
專業(yè): 應(yīng)用數(shù)學(xué)方法

引用回帖:

13樓: Originally posted by visitor958 at 2012-04-11 17:02:00:
這個(gè)雜志，你認(rèn)真改幾次就可以了，不過一定要認(rèn)真。而且你要有耐心，這個(gè)雜志（有時(shí)）比較慢。

樓主，非常感謝您的回復(fù)。您投過該雜志嗎？如果投過的話，經(jīng)歷是否和我的一樣，這個(gè)雜志，是不是沒有大修這個(gè)狀態(tài)，一直讓人修改重投��？

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

15樓2012-04-12 15:26:06

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

zhzimi_2007

木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 1759.3
散金: 50
帖子: 3631
在線: 703.6小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 450803
注冊: 2007-11-04
專業(yè): 應(yīng)用數(shù)學(xué)方法

引用回帖:

樓主，非常感謝您的回復(fù)。您投過該雜志嗎？如果投過的話，經(jīng)歷是否和我的一樣，這個(gè)雜志，是不是沒有大修這個(gè)狀態(tài)，一直讓人修改重投�。�

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

16樓2012-04-13 22:53:14

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

xliu_mel

金蟲 (小有名氣)

中山北路文藝青年

應(yīng)助: 88 (初中生)
金幣: 208.3
散金: 1000
紅花: 4
帖子: 171
在線: 108.9小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 1727807
注冊: 2012-03-30
性別: GG
專業(yè): 計(jì)算機(jī)軟件

【答案】應(yīng)助回帖

★ ★ ★
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
zhzimi_2007: 金幣+2 2012-04-14 14:12:24
zhzimi_2007: 金幣+1 2012-04-14 14:14:01

只要兩次意見不一樣，就說明的確走的是revise and resubmit的過程。所以個(gè)人建議樓主如果覺得這次回來的修改意見還是在可以修改的范圍內(nèi)的話，還是認(rèn)真的修改，下次就很有可能是major revision了。畢竟同樣的審稿人看了兩輪了，應(yīng)該是有希望的。不過前提一定要是認(rèn)真的修改和回復(fù)。

祝樓主好運(yùn)！

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

堅(jiān)持就是勝利！

17樓2012-04-13 23:23:38

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

renochen

禁蟲 (小有名氣)

本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽

18樓2012-04-14 10:20:19

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

打豆豆66

新蟲 (初入文壇)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 252.9
帖子: 19
在線: 30.2小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 1412326
注冊: 2011-09-22
專業(yè): 運(yùn)籌學(xué)

樓主，我想請教一下，你這篇文章最后的結(jié)果如何呢？因?yàn)槲易罱泊蛩阃哆@個(gè)雜志。

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

19樓2013-10-23 22:24:16

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn) 我要訂閱樓主 zhzimi_2007 的主題更新

返回列表

最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部]		作者	回/看	最后發(fā)表

[考研] 本人考085602 化學(xué)工程專碩 +20	不知道叫什么！ 2026-03-15	22/1100	2026-03-21 19:03 by ColorlessPI
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +3	X123- 2026-03-14	3/150	2026-03-21 18:40 by ColorlessPI
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩333求調(diào)劑 +3	北道巷 2026-03-18	3/150	2026-03-21 18:17 by 學(xué)員8dgXkO
[考研] 26考研一志愿中國石油大學(xué)(華東)305分求調(diào)劑 +6	嘉年新程 2026-03-15	6/300	2026-03-21 17:07 by Dream007008
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +9	簡單點(diǎn)0 2026-03-17	9/450	2026-03-21 15:37 by lature00
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +6	梁茜雯 2026-03-19	6/300	2026-03-21 06:32 by Ecowxq666！
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +10	冷笙123 2026-03-17	10/500	2026-03-21 01:54 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 354求調(diào)劑 +5	Tyoumou 2026-03-18	8/400	2026-03-21 00:35 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +5	申子申申 2026-03-19	9/450	2026-03-20 22:26 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +7	晨昏線與星海 2026-03-19	8/400	2026-03-20 22:19 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 材料與化工 322求調(diào)劑 +4	然11 2026-03-19	4/200	2026-03-20 22:12 by luoyongfeng
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +9	想上學(xué)吖吖 2026-03-19	9/450	2026-03-20 22:01 by luoyongfeng
[考研] 材料考研調(diào)劑 +3	xwt。 2026-03-19	3/150	2026-03-19 11:22 by w沐陽w
[考研] 一志愿985，本科211，0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù)319求調(diào)劑 +10	Liwangman 2026-03-15	10/500	2026-03-19 10:25 by 無際的草原
[考研] 0703化學(xué)336分求調(diào)劑 +6	zbzihdhd 2026-03-15	7/350	2026-03-18 09:53 by zhukairuo
[考研] 材料專碩326求調(diào)劑 +6	墨煜姒莘 2026-03-15	7/350	2026-03-17 17:10 by ruiyingmiao
[考研] 085601求調(diào)劑 +4	Du.11 2026-03-16	4/200	2026-03-17 17:08 by ruiyingmiao
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +5	素年祭語 2026-03-15	5/250	2026-03-16 17:00 by 我的船我的海
[考研] 070303 總分349求調(diào)劑 +3	LJY9966 2026-03-15	5/250	2026-03-16 14:24 by xwxstudy
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 +4	奇點(diǎn)0314 2026-03-14	4/200	2026-03-14 23:04 by JourneyLucky