投的是Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C
意見(jiàn)比較多，但沒(méi)有致命性意見(jiàn)，基本上是要求描述更清楚、圖片修改之類(lèi)；總體意見(jiàn)有幾句如下：
In general, in the opinion of the reviewer, the paper is a well-written
paper. The paper is interesting, the work presented has a good level, is
precise, carefully done and the conclusions are quite clear and useful.
The topic is of interest and the argument is plausible. Nevertheless, authors
should complete a better explanation of some aspects of the paper that will
be exposed in the next lines.
看這個(gè)總體意見(jiàn)，我覺(jué)得應(yīng)該是中了，但有個(gè)疑問(wèn)，對(duì)下面分條的意見(jiàn)，都要逐條做出解釋嗎？因?yàn)橛行┮庖?jiàn)偏離論文的主題，審稿人可能是外行。
另外，論文文字?jǐn)?shù)量超了點(diǎn)，編輯在意見(jiàn)里也提出來(lái)了，如果再修改完，字?jǐn)?shù)可能還多，不知道這個(gè)是不是個(gè)大問(wèn)題？ |
回復(fù)此樓
+2/120
