| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1222 | 回復(fù): 8 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
北美范文-感覺這篇與題目不對應(yīng)啊
|
|||
|
The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general welfare of all its people. The speaker claims that great advances in knowledge necessarily involve rejection of authority. To the extent that political authority impedes such advances, I agree with this claim. Otherwise, in my view most advances in knowledge actually embrace certain forms of authority, rather than rejecting authority out of hand. One striking example of how political authority can impede the advancement of knowledge involves what we know about the age and evolution of planet Earth. In earlier centuries the official Church of England called for a literal interpretation of the Bible, according to which the Earth's age is determined to be about 6,000 years. If Western thinkers had continued to yield to the ostensible authority of the Church, the fields of structural and historical geology would never have advanced beyond the blind acceptance of this contention as fact. A more modern example of how yielding to political authority can impede the advancement of knowledge involves the Soviet Refusenik movement of the 1920s. During this time period the Soviet government attempted not only to control the direction and the goals of its scientists' research but also to distort the outcome of that research. During the 1920s the Soviet government quashed certain areas of scientific inquiry, destroyed entire research facilities and libraries, and caused the sudden disappearance of many scientists who were engaged in research that the state viewed as a potential threat to its power and authority. Not surprisingly, during this time period no significant advances in scientific knowledge occurred under the auspices of the Soviet government. However, given a political climate that facilitates free thought and honest intellectual inquiry, great advances in knowledge can be made by actually embracing certain forms of "authority." A good example involves modern computer technology. Only by building on, or embracing, certain well-established laws of physics were engineers able to develop silicon-based semi-conductor technology. Although new biotechnology research suggests that organic, biochemical processors will replace artificial semi-conductors as the computers of the future, it would be inappropriate to characterize this leap in knowledge as a rejection of authority. In sum, to the extent that political authority imposes artificial constraints on knowledge, I agree that advances in knowledge might require rejection of authority. Otherwise, in my observation advances in knowledge more typically embrace and build on authoritative scientific principles and laws, and do not require the rejection of any type of authority. 北美范文COPY下來的,怎么感覺文章與題目不太對應(yīng)啊,還是我太菜了。 |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+1/181
+1/88
+1/87
+1/87
+1/83
+2/58
+1/39
+1/37
+1/37
+1/18
+1/18
+1/9
+1/8
+2/6
+1/5
+1/5
+1/4
+1/4
+1/3
+1/1
|
是不對的,我已找到對應(yīng)的官方文章了 Does a nation's greatness lie in the general welfare of its people rather than in the achievements of its artists, rulers, and scientists, as the speaker claims? I find this claim problematic in two respects. First, it fails to define "general welfare." Second, it assumes that the sorts of achievements that the speaker cites have little to do with a nation's general welfare--when in fact they have everything to do with it. At first blush the speaker's claim might appear to have considerable merit. After all, the overriding imperative for any democratic state is to enhance the general welfare of its citizenry. Yet the speaker fails to provide a clear litmus test for measuring that welfare. When we speak of "promoting the general welfare," the following aims come to mind: public health and safety, security against military invasions, individual autonomy and freedom, cultural richness, and overall comfort--that is, a high standard of living. Curiously, it is our scientists, artists, and political leaders-----or so-called "rulers" who by way of their achievements bring these aims into fruition. Thus, in order to determine what makes a nation great it is necessary to examine the different sorts of individual achievements that ostensibly promote these aims. Few would disagree that many scientific achievements serve to enhance a nation's general welfare. Advances in the health sciences have enhanced our physical well-being, comfort, and life span. Advances in technology have enabled us to travel to more places, communicate with more people from different walks of life, and learn about the world from our desktops. Advances in physics and engineering make our abodes and other buildings safer, and enable us to travel to more places, and to travel to more distant places, with greater safety and speed. Artistic achievement is also needed to make a nation a better place for humans overall. Art provides inspiration, lifts the human spirit, and incites our creativity and imagination, all of which spur us on to greater accomplishments and help us appreciate our own humanity. Yet the achievements of scientists and artists, while integral, do not suffice to ensure the welfare of a nation's citizens. In order to survive, let alone be great, a nation must be able to defend its borders and to live peaceably with other nations. Thus the military and diplomatic accomplishments of a nation's leaders provide an integral contribution to the general welfare of any nation's populace. Notwithstanding the evidence that, in the aggregate, individual achievements of the sorts listed above are what promote a nation's general welfare, we should be careful not to hastily assume that a nation is necessarily great merely by virtue of the achievements of individual citizens. Once having secured the safety and security of its citizens, political rulers must not exploit or oppress those citizens. Also, the populace must embrace and learn to appreciate artistic accomplishment, and to use rather than misuse or abuse scientific knowledge. Of particular concern are the many ways in which scientific achievements have served to diminish our quality of life, thereby impeding the general welfare. It is through scientific "achievements" that chemicals in our food, water, and air increase the incidence and variety of cancers; that our very existence as a species is jeopardized by the threat of nuclear warfare; and that greenhouse gases which deplete our ozone layer and heat the Earth's atmosphere threaten civilization itself. In sum, in asserting that general welfare--and neither the scientific, artistic, nor political achievements of individuals--provides the yardstick for measuring a nation's greatness, the speaker misses the point that general welfare is the end product of individual achievements. Besides, achievements of artists, scientists, and political leaders rarely inure only to one particular nation. Rather, these achievements benefit people the world over. Accordingly, by way of these achievements the world, not just one nation, grows in its greatness. |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑一志愿哈工大324 +8 | 閆旭東 2026-03-28 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大材料工程290求調(diào)劑 +19 | Youth_ 2026-03-30 | 19/950 |
|
|
[考研] 309求調(diào)劑 +6 | 呆菇不是戴夫 2026-04-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +5 | 想上學(xué)求調(diào) 2026-04-01 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 085600 295分求調(diào)劑 +15 | W55j 2026-03-30 | 18/900 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +3 | 梁梁校校 2026-04-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境工程297分求調(diào)劑一志愿杭高院 +10 | GENJIOW 2026-03-31 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 0856,材料與化工321分求調(diào)劑 +13 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 14/700 |
|
|
[論文投稿]
chinese chemical letters英文版投稿求助
120+4
|
Yishengeryi 2026-03-30 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 262求調(diào)劑 +9 | 勵志一定發(fā)文章 2026-03-31 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北交材料工程總分358 +5 | cs0106 2026-04-01 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +10 | Eujd1 2026-03-31 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 352分-085602-一志愿985 +6 | 海納百川Ly 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 生物學(xué) 377分 +6 | zzll03 2026-03-31 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0856 335分 +9 | cccchenso 2026-03-29 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研]
|
Gymno 2026-03-30 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +12 | j的立方 2026-03-29 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +10 | 宋明欣 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 2026年華南師范大學(xué)歡迎化學(xué),化工,生物,生醫(yī)工等專業(yè)優(yōu)秀學(xué)子加入! +3 | llss0711 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 085405 考的11408求各位老師帶走 +3 | Qiu學(xué)ing 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|