 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 870 | 回復(fù): 2 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
索尼克大人鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
第一篇論文投JMS被拒后，相同模型內(nèi)容不同的文章（第一篇的延續(xù)工作）再投JMS有戲么 已有2人參與
|
||
|
內(nèi)容較長，請各位海涵！ 第一篇論文投JMS被拒后，編輯給出的拒稿信： I have received two reports on this manuscript from well-established reviewers. I have read their comments and find that they raise some very valid concerns. On one hand, it appears that not all the important parameters are accounted for in the cost estimation, and on the other hand, some flaws in the algorithms cast some doubts on the actual result. I admit that the prediction of performance and cost of Membrane systems is a difficult exercise, but in the present case, I think this submission cannot be published as a research paper for the reasons mentioned here above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions on this file. 兩個審稿人的部分意見 Reviewer #1: The article has two main items namely predicting/calculation performance of RO systems and cost of the produced water. The cost calculations have no added value. Main reason is that the input is far from complete and far from correct e.g. pre-treatment cost are not included and the cost of membrane elements are two times higher than actual cost. The performance predictions/calculations with the developed model suggest that the existing models used by e.g. Dow, Hydranautics and Toray don't exists or are inferior. This part could have given an added value if results obtained with the model were compared with the results of calculations done with the projection programs of the abovementioned companies. Results of an existing plant (source: publication) are compared with model calculations and concluded that the model is O.K. However it is not clear what exactly the input data were in this reference.And the comparison is marginally done. Recommend to rewriting the article and compare results obtained from the model and projection programs in detail for several situations. If the model fits it might be useful to publish and to making the program fully available for the desalination society. This has an added value since it is unknow how the projection programs do the calculations. Reviewer #2: This paper may be reviewed after incorporating following major revisions, some comments are listed as follow: 1. A structural diagram of membrane module should be given, which can describe the module model and symbols in Eqs. (1)-(4). 。。。中間的意見基本上都是一些不大的錯誤 15. As far as I know, the outer approximation algorithm can solve the MINLP problem, which just likes the following form: Min cy + f(x) s.t. , c is constant where the binary variable y is linear, it is just as the statement in line 49 on page 18 “a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) master problem”. However, when Eqs. (54)-(55) is put in Eqs. (6)-(7), the terms related to integer variable seem to be nonlinear. The MINLP problem presented in this manuscript is not like the form mentioned above, it does not always guarantee to get solution with the outer approximation algorithm. It seems that the MINLP model presented in this manuscript is not strict. 第一個審稿人的意見我進行了修改，關(guān)鍵的第二個審稿人關(guān)于算法的疑問，我找到了兩篇發(fā)表的論文可以進行佐證，并且論文中采用的DICOPT算法的說明書中指出改算法經(jīng)過改進后可以處理我的論文中的這種情況。 于是我把第一篇小論文修改后改投的其他雜志。 我的第二篇論文建模部分跟第一篇完全一樣，但是第一篇文章是單目標(biāo)，第二篇是多目標(biāo)優(yōu)化，用到的算法、研究內(nèi)容和結(jié)果討論都不一樣。這樣算不算一稿多投？第二篇文章再投JMS還有希望么？cover letter怎么寫比較合適呢？ 謝謝大家了！ [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-5-27 at 09:37 ] |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
307求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有20人回復(fù)
-
285求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
材料與化工（0856）304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
370求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
070300化學(xué)279求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
福建理工大學(xué)材料學(xué)院先進合金團隊招收考研調(diào)劑學(xué)生
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
英一數(shù)一408，總分284，二戰(zhàn)真誠求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
083000環(huán)境科學(xué)與工程調(diào)劑，總分281
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
食品工程專碩一志愿中海洋309求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- JMS編輯拒稿怎么辦，求助��！
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 投稿 JMS，1天后變成 Decision in process
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- JMS投稿，編輯的回信
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 第一次投sci被拒，改投同一出版社另一個雜志，要不要說明曾被拒稿？
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- PRB投稿，文章到審稿人手上一個多月還沒消息，正常嗎？
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- JMS直接被主編拒稿
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- APL投稿被拒，但編輯和審稿人均建議投到JAP，中的幾率有多大？
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 請問PRL的投稿狀態(tài)
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- JMS審稿十天結(jié)束，什么情況？
已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
- 審稿意見中要補充文獻，可是到哪里找��？
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 稿件曲折的經(jīng)歷JAP->JMS->APL->PRL->PRB終于中了
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- 投JMS被拒，改投哪些期刊好�。�
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- JMS 的文章要求大修但卻沒有具體審稿意見
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 談?wù)勎覀兺禔PL的坎坷經(jīng)歷
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- JMS的文章修改意見來了，在加參考文獻這條上犯難了！
已經(jīng)有40人回復(fù)
3樓2012-05-29 10:36:44
2樓2012-05-27 10:05:38
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +4 | xiao愛同學(xué) 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[有機交流]
 甲基亞磺磺酸鈉和甲基磺酸酯反應(yīng)機理
 10+3
|
kaobao456 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 生物考研337分求調(diào)劑 +3 | cgxin 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 合肥區(qū)域性重點一本招收調(diào)劑 +4 | 6266jl 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 277跪求調(diào)劑 +8 | 1915668 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +7 | 藍月亮亮 2026-03-30 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 071010 323 分求調(diào)劑 +3 | Baekzhy 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)308分調(diào)劑 +7 | 你好明天你好 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | Lyy930824@ 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 【求調(diào)劑】085601材料工程專碩 | 總分272 | +7 | 腳滑的守法公民 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 總分293求調(diào)劑 +8 | 加一一九 2026-03-25 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 343求調(diào)劑 +5 | 愛羈絆 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 266分求材料化工冶金礦業(yè)等專業(yè)的調(diào)劑 +4 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大085600，310分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 李瀟可 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 +5 | .m.. 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 中國科學(xué)院深圳先進技術(shù)研究院-光纖傳感課題組招生-中國科學(xué)院大學(xué)、深圳理工大學(xué)聯(lián)培 +5 | YangTyu1 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩 335 分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拒絕冷暴力 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 各位老師您好：本人初試372分 +5 | jj涌77 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化315 求調(diào)劑 +3 | akrrain 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|