| 查看: 3494 | 回復(fù): 18 | |||
smallbug2000木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
|
[求助]
哥的論文大修,哥很郁悶,哥不想改了
|
||
|
投了一篇論文到計(jì)算機(jī)視覺(jué)相關(guān)的雜志,最近返回結(jié)果,三個(gè)審稿人,其中兩個(gè)審稿人意見(jiàn)較少。另一個(gè)覺(jué)得算法的創(chuàng)新性不夠,給了大修,悲劇的是這篇論文之前投到CVPR去,也是這個(gè)審稿人審的(CVPR據(jù)了我),因?yàn)閷徃逡庖?jiàn)基本一樣,故可以斷定是同一審稿人。最終編輯給了大修,但是我很絕望,因?yàn)榻o大修的審稿人從一開(kāi)始就不認(rèn)可我的算法,我想既然我認(rèn)真修改了,可能還是會(huì)被他據(jù)。將編輯及大修審稿人意見(jiàn)附后,在此向各位大牛咨詢(xún)兩件事:1)該論文是否值得大修,修后被據(jù)的概率多大?2)如果大修,如果對(duì)付審稿人這么尖銳的問(wèn)題。在些感謝,對(duì)于好的建議發(fā)放金幣。 Dear**, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. The reviewers' comments can be found at the end of this email or can be accessed by following the provided link. Reviewers' comments: The paper was reviewed by three experts on the topic. The reviewers agree that the paper discusses an important problem worth pursuing. They, however, also unanimously point out short comings of the paper, most important of which is the lack of thorough theoretical and experimental validation of the claims as well as references to prior work. The paper needs major revision to be considered for publication. If the authors decide to submit a major revision, please make sure to address the points raised by the reviewers. Reviewer #2: : This paper deals with the problem of visual tracking with irregular object motion. The particle set shift approach based on analytic optimization is proposed to deal with the incorrect state dynamic model. Particles are first sampled by the state dynamic model and they are moved to higher likelihood regions by newton optimization by maximizing likelihoods. The efficacy of the proposed approach is demonstrated via experiments with real sequences. - Positive points: Practically effective approach - Negative points: Not novel approach, rather heuristic, not convincing experimental results : The main problem of this paper is the proposed approach is not novel. The proposed approach is quite similar to [18] except the fact that the proposed approach used newton optimization instead of mean shift. : The proposed approach is rather heuristic. In the algorithm, particle weights are only proportional to likelihood, and this holds true for SIR particle filter where particles are sampled from state dynamic model. However, since particles are moved to higher likelihoods artificially, the weights determined from likelihoods will no longer correctly represent the true posterior. The proposed approach is rather similar to the particle swarm optimization-based tracking, e.g., "" by X. ** et al in CVPR 2008. Another problem of the proposed approach is that it might result in worse tracking results when there are appearance changes caused by various issues such as pose and lighting changes. : Since the proposed work is based on particle filter, the optimal importance functions used for visual tracking are also relevant. If we can use the optimal importance function, the irregular motion can be handled at least partially. Thus the following papers should be cited and commented as related work: - : The supplementary video result is too limited. Only a result for a single short sequence is not sufficient to support the validity of the proposed approach. Why is there no rotational motion in the results? The paper says that the state is translation, scale, and rotation, but there is no rotational motion in the results in the paper and video. : There must be cases that all particles are outside the basin of convergence. Since the particle are shifted by local optimization, particles will diverge from the optimal positions and tracking will fail. In the proposed approach, there is no consideration of this possibility. : The optimization will increase the computational complexity considerably. It is necessary to compare the other algorithms under the same computational time, e.g., proposed framework with 100 particles and standard particle filter with 1000 particles. My current recommendation is major revision. If the authors want to make the paper accepted in spite of the limited novelty and contribution, I think the followings should be addressed in the revision: - Additional experiments with object appearance changes like illumination - Addition of a mechanism to deal with the local optima problems with additional experiments with related videos - Comparison under the same computational complexity for different tracking algorithms [ Last edited by smallbug2000 on 2012-9-6 at 09:52 ] |
文章寫(xiě)作 |
銅蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
這個(gè)修改意見(jiàn)不算多的,具體就是: 1、增加實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果以驗(yàn)證你方法的有效性;(這個(gè)只要有數(shù)據(jù),應(yīng)該好辦) 2、局部最優(yōu)問(wèn)題,這個(gè)較難回答,一種你找到方法;另外一種就是通過(guò)實(shí)驗(yàn)來(lái)說(shuō)明; 3、與不同算法的比較。首先找找網(wǎng)上有沒(méi)有現(xiàn)成的能出結(jié)果的代碼吧;實(shí)在不行只有自己實(shí)現(xiàn);話說(shuō)實(shí)驗(yàn)室如果有做換個(gè)方向的話應(yīng)該是有一定基礎(chǔ)吧。 強(qiáng)烈建議:按照專(zhuān)家意見(jiàn)修改,不要回避,最終你會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)有收獲的!! |
至尊木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
銅蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
哦,沒(méi)有仔細(xì)看,是的,是比較計(jì)算復(fù)雜度 ![]() 我曾經(jīng)有篇文章,3個(gè)審稿人都提了若干條修改意見(jiàn);其中一個(gè)估計(jì)是老外,看的非常仔細(xì),提了9條意見(jiàn),每條都很頭疼。 硬著頭皮逐條對(duì)照修改,實(shí)在改不了或者實(shí)現(xiàn)起來(lái)有難度,也一定要能說(shuō)服審稿人。 最后改完,3人全部通過(guò)。不過(guò)等于是重寫(xiě)了篇。。。 還是那句話,審稿人提的意見(jiàn)一般都是很中肯的,建議對(duì)照修改,而不是降低檔次改投別的。。 |
銅蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
鐵蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)

木蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 317分 一志愿南理工材料工程 本科湖工大 求調(diào)劑 +9 | 芋泥小鈴鐺 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +8 | 蕉蕉123 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料化工調(diào)劑 總分330 +14 | zhubinhao 2026-03-27 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑310 +8 | 溫柔的晚安 2026-03-25 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 085600 材料與化工 329分求調(diào)劑 +11 | Mr. Z 2026-03-25 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)材料與化工方向336分 +9 | 辰沐5211314 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化085600材料專(zhuān)碩275|有文章專(zhuān)利|求調(diào)劑 +7 | Micky11223 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 化工專(zhuān)碩 338分 求調(diào)劑 +12 | 路癡小琪 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 394求調(diào)劑 +3 | 好事多磨靜候佳?/a> 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +12 | PolarBear11 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 307分 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 不知道叫什么! 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +3 | 加油沖。 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +8 | 超級(jí)伊昂大王 2026-03-24 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研]
材料學(xué)碩,求調(diào)劑
6+5
|
糖葫蘆888ll 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京郵電大學(xué) 288分 材料考研 求調(diào)劑 +3 | jl0720 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 總分293求調(diào)劑 +6 | 加一一九 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉林大學(xué)材料與化工303分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 為學(xué)666 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理085500機(jī)械專(zhuān)業(yè)總分300求調(diào)劑 +3 | an10101 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +4 | 13853210211 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 292求調(diào)劑 +4 | 鵝鵝鵝額額額額?/a> 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|