 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2162 | 回復(fù): 4 | ||
smallbug2000木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
|
[求助]
論文大修，但是改不動(dòng)，郁悶呀
|
|
投了一篇論文到某期刊，最近返回結(jié)果，三個(gè)審稿人，其中兩個(gè)審稿人意見(jiàn)較少。另一個(gè)覺(jué)得算法的創(chuàng)新性不夠，給了大修，悲劇的是這篇論文之前投到CVPR去，也是這個(gè)審稿人審的（CVPR據(jù)了我），因?yàn)閷徃逡庖?jiàn)基本一樣，故可以斷定是同一審稿人。最終編輯給了大修，但是我很絕望，因?yàn)榻o大修的審稿人從一開(kāi)始就不認(rèn)可我的算法，我想既然我認(rèn)真修改了，可能還是會(huì)被他據(jù)。將編輯及大修審稿人意見(jiàn)附后，在此向各位大牛咨詢兩件事：1）該論文是否值得大修，修后被據(jù)的概率多大？2）如果大修，如果對(duì)付審稿人這么尖銳的問(wèn)題。在些感謝，對(duì)于好的建議發(fā)放金幣。 Dear Dr. XXX, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. The reviewers' comments can be found at the end of this email or can be accessed by following the provided link. When revising your work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Yours sincerely XXX, Ph.D. Associate Editor XXXXX Reviewers' comments: The paper was reviewed by three experts on the topic. The reviewers agree that the paper discusses an important problem worth pursuing. They, however, also unanimously point out short comings of the paper, most important of which is the lack of thorough theoretical and experimental validation of the claims as well as references to prior work. The paper needs major revision to be considered for publication. If the authors decide to submit a major revision, please make sure to address the points raised by the reviewers. Reviewer #2: : This paper deals with the problem of visual tracking with irregular object motion. The particle set shift approach based on analytic optimization is proposed to deal with the incorrect state dynamic model. Particles are first sampled by the state dynamic model and they are moved to higher likelihood regions by newton optimization by maximizing likelihoods. The efficacy of the proposed approach is demonstrated via experiments with real sequences. - Positive points: Practically effective approach - Negative points: Not novel approach, rather heuristic, not convincing experimental results : The main problem of this paper is the proposed approach is not novel. The proposed approach is quite similar to [18] except the fact that the proposed approach used newton optimization instead of mean shift. : The proposed approach is rather heuristic. In the algorithm, particle weights are only proportional to likelihood, and this holds true for SIR particle filter where particles are sampled from state dynamic model. However, since particles are moved to higher likelihoods artificially, the weights determined from likelihoods will no longer correctly represent the true posterior. The proposed approach is rather similar to the particle swarm optimization-based tracking, e.g., "Sequential particle swarm optimization for visual tracking" by xxxx. Another problem of the proposed approach is that it might result in worse tracking results when there are appearance changes caused by various issues such as pose and lighting changes. : Since the proposed work is based on particle filter, the optimal importance functions used for visual tracking are also relevant. If we can use the optimal importance function, the irregular motion can be handled at least partially. Thus the following papers should be cited and commented as related work: - ref1xxxx - ref2xxxx : The supplementary video result is too limited. Only a result for a single short sequence is not sufficient to support the validity of the proposed approach. Why is there no rotational motion in the results? The paper says that the state is translation, scale, and rotation, but there is no rotational motion in the results in the paper and video. : There must be cases that all particles are outside the basin of convergence. Since the particle are shifted by local optimization, particles will diverge from the optimal positions and tracking will fail. In the proposed approach, there is no consideration of this possibility. : The optimization will increase the computational complexity considerably. It is necessary to compare the other algorithms under the same computational time, e.g., proposed framework with 100 particles and standard particle filter with 1000 particles. My current recommendation is major revision. If the authors want to make the paper accepted in spite of the limited novelty and contribution, I think the followings should be addressed in the revision: - Additional experiments with object appearance changes like illumination - Addition of a mechanism to deal with the local optima problems with additional experiments with related videos - Comparison under the same computational complexity for different tracking algorithms [ Last edited by cxksama on 2012-9-6 at 10:48 ] |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
0703化學(xué) 305求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
一志愿211，0703化學(xué)310分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
廣西大學(xué)材料導(dǎo)師推薦
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
化學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
資源與環(huán)境 調(diào)劑申請(qǐng)(333分)
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
311求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
269專碩求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
085600材料與化工306
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿西安交通大學(xué)材料工程專業(yè) 282分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
材料求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 文章要大修，改成short communication形式，如何改啊？
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 文章大修，我如果3天就提交修改稿，編輯會(huì)不會(huì)認(rèn)為我不認(rèn)真？
已經(jīng)有27人回復(fù)
- 論文大修 郁悶
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
- 什么叫大修？文章大修是不是非得對(duì)原論文作大的改動(dòng)？
已經(jīng)有25人回復(fù)
- 論文大修，修改意見(jiàn)回復(fù)
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- 文章大修，可以改小部分?jǐn)?shù)據(jù)嗎？
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 大修時(shí)能否更改第一作者？
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
- 文章大修，修改列表需要重復(fù)point-to-point 的修改細(xì)節(jié)嗎？
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 論文大修，問(wèn)題一大堆，修改意見(jiàn)四頁(yè)多，修后錄用可能性大不？
已經(jīng)有30人回復(fù)
- 一篇論文大修后小修 讓改英語(yǔ)。導(dǎo)師要求和我邊討論邊修改 結(jié)果改完后居然出現(xiàn)中文了
已經(jīng)有40人回復(fù)
- 郁悶，兩篇文章都是大修后被拒！
已經(jīng)有32人回復(fù)
- 論文要大修，很郁悶
已經(jīng)有36人回復(fù)
- 郁悶呀 導(dǎo)師改論文就是拖時(shí)間 怎么辦
已經(jīng)有49人回復(fù)
yangsh_nj
木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
- 應(yīng)助: 97 (初中生)
- 金幣: 4396.9
- 散金: 9795
- 紅花: 23
- 帖子: 1763
- 在線: 1493小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 1373354
- 注冊(cè): 2011-08-19
- 專業(yè): 運(yùn)動(dòng)生理學(xué)
2樓2012-09-06 09:32:14
smallbug2000
木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
- 應(yīng)助: 13 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 2299.8
- 散金: 1794
- 紅花: 17
- 帖子: 1239
- 在線: 782小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 434011
- 注冊(cè): 2007-08-18
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 計(jì)算機(jī)應(yīng)用技術(shù)
3樓2012-09-06 09:35:48
rockinuk
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
- SEPI: 10
- 應(yīng)助: 1512 (講師)
- 金幣: 7810.9
- 散金: 189
- 紅花: 106
- 帖子: 3982
- 在線: 570.6小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 1945379
- 注冊(cè): 2012-08-19
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 數(shù)論
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
★ ★ ★
cxksama: 金幣+3, 鼓勵(lì)交流，有道理。 2012-09-06 09:57:22
cxksama: 金幣+3, 鼓勵(lì)交流，有道理。 2012-09-06 09:57:22
|
1) 若沒(méi)辦法根據(jù) reviewer 的意見(jiàn)大修的話~就改投吧~ 或是 建議 editor 改更換新的 rviewer. 2) 2F 的意見(jiàn)及立場(chǎng)固然是沒(méi)錯(cuò)，但我個(gè)人覺(jué)得沒(méi)有什么不妥。 Why? 樓主并沒(méi)有把 reviewer 的姓名公開(kāi)。這是一個(gè) "盲審"；editor 也沒(méi)有對(duì)樓主公開(kāi)誰(shuí)是 reviewer，所以樓主并沒(méi)有道德上的問(wèn)題。 至于樓主把 editor 的姓名及單位公開(kāi)，這也沒(méi)什么不妥的。 Editor 本身就是一個(gè)公開(kāi)的信息，不論在投稿系統(tǒng)，在官網(wǎng)的Editorial board 上，都是公開(kāi)的。 身為一名 editor 是可接受 "公議"，也讓投稿作者(樓主)知道責(zé)任編輯是誰(shuí)。 基于此，我個(gè)人并不覺(jué)得樓主有什么錯(cuò)，或道德上的瑕疵。 |
4樓2012-09-06 09:51:23
rockinuk
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
- SEPI: 10
- 應(yīng)助: 1512 (講師)
- 金幣: 7810.9
- 散金: 189
- 紅花: 106
- 帖子: 3982
- 在線: 570.6小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 1945379
- 注冊(cè): 2012-08-19
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 數(shù)論
5樓2012-09-06 10:00:30
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 smallbug2000 的主題更新
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 277材料科學(xué)與工程080500求調(diào)劑 +6 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +12 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-19 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +6 | 梁茜雯 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +3 | wyyyqx 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑，英語(yǔ)六級(jí)551，有科研經(jīng)歷 +4 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 華東師范大學(xué)-071000生物學(xué)-293分-求調(diào)劑 +3 | 研究生何瑤明 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西南交大，求調(diào)劑 +5 | 材化逐夢(mèng)人 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +7 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿蘇州大學(xué)材料求調(diào)劑，總分315（英一） +5 | sbdksD 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程348求調(diào)劑 +3 | ￣^￣゜汗 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑，英語(yǔ)六級(jí)551，有科研經(jīng)歷 +4 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-16 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿985，本科211，0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù)319求調(diào)劑 +10 | Liwangman 2026-03-15 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 334求調(diào)劑 +3 | 志存高遠(yuǎn)意在機(jī)?/a> 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +5 | 上岸的小葡 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[碩博家園] 湖北工業(yè)大學(xué) 生命科學(xué)與健康學(xué)院-課題組招收2026級(jí)食品/生物方向碩士 +3 | 1喜春8 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +3 | p asserby. 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +4 | 太陽(yáng)花天天開(kāi)心 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 文思客 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +5 | 素年祭語(yǔ) 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|