| 24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2794 | 回復(fù): 18 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
孤狐孤城木蟲(chóng) (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
大家?guī)兔纯,編輯這樣的回復(fù)文章還有戲嗎?
|
||
|
之前投了CEJ,兩個(gè)半月后編輯回復(fù)如下: Dear##, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. In fact all reviewers had a lot of critical comments and raised many concerns. One of the reviewer indicated to me the manuscript was poorly written and indicated such manuscripts should not have been submitted. So, in general the manuscript needs a lot of work, both in the technical content and the editorial quality. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. Please give a careful consideration to the criticisms raised. All of them should be taken into account in a revised version of your manuscript. Please send your revised manuscript, together with an itemized letter answering all the comments made and describing all changes made in response, or the reason why no change should be made. Because of the extensive comments made and the criticism raised, your revised manuscript will be sent to all three referees for rereview. If any of the referees declines the revised manuscript or major revisions are requested again, I will have to decline the manuscript since we cannot go back and forth with the reviewers numerous times. So, please try to do a really good job in the revision of the manuscript. 三個(gè)評(píng)審只有一個(gè)說(shuō)可以考慮修改后接收,編輯還是給了major revision,可是這種情況怎么看都兇多吉少了,請(qǐng)問(wèn)有類似經(jīng)驗(yàn)的蟲(chóng)友們我的文章還有戲嗎? |
專家顧問(wèn) (文壇精英)
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +584 |
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (著名寫手)
新蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
術(shù)中小生
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|