| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2176 | 回復(fù): 19 | ||||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 2 個(gè) ESEPI ,點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | ||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||
winter_north鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
|
[交流]
【weekly topic】To dismantle or not dismantle
|
|||
|
We are experiencing a rapid urbanization now. The cities are expanding their boundaries to all directions, north, south, east, west, upward, downward. More and more villages are caught into the arms of city. These villages become into village-in-city. What’s the fate of such urban villages? I don’t know much about such village. At first sight, the buildings in these villages are not beautiful, some are short, some are tall, but everyone has a similar shape, without little element in their design, they are only built for use, so all the decorations are left out, in order to reduce the cost. Do these houses have pipe line systems for sewage, tap water and gas? I don’t know. Perhaps conditions may be different in different cities. The lanes in these villages are very narrow, compared with the wide street in the cities. House rent in these villages are low, they become very good homes for newly graduated students and for farmers who come to work in cities. Often, the building in such villages are not tall, but in one such villages in our city, building are all about 8-10 stories tall, compared with 4-5 in other villages. In order to make the city beautiful, all the villages are being dismantled now. It is easy to dismantle such villages. Only about 20 days are needed to pull down such a village. Then taller, more beautiful buildings will be build at the sites of these villages. It seems who pay for it is not important. But, obviously, dismantling such buildings is a waste. A couple of years ago, a 28-story building beside the West Lake in Hangzhou was dismantled. Compared with such a building, buildings in urban villages can only be regarded as nothing. But, they are buildings, they are built with cement, brick, steel, workers got paid for their building process. Although they are shabby, they are not beautiful, they can still be used. It is said that the life of a building in China is 70 years. But, too often, many buildings are pulled down in their childhood. A question is, do such building have to be pulled down? What’s your opinion? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() [ Last edited by curton on 2012-9-20 at 23:17 ] |
Weekly Topic |
鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
專家
|
I don't think they should be dismantled. Even in the developed countries there are many slums in the center of the city, why should the old buildings for the underprivileged be dismantled? For the general planning or layout of the whole city, they may need equal beautiful buildings. But in fact, the houses and simple apartments in the outskirt of the city are established for urgent use, not for the visitors' eyes. The city are developed, improved by the citizens and for the citizens, so the government should take into their needs into account first. People are born equal, and citizens living in the downtown or the suburbs should be equal in the share of common resources, so those from the villages need not to sacrifice their simple demands to the commercial use of only a dose of citizens. In the next step, we should consider how to rebuid or decorate the houses in the suburban areas in an convenient and pratical way rather than dismantle them or leave them they used to be. In America, there are many movable houses and buildings in the farms that can be small and exquisite. Likewise, in the rebuilding of old houses some new building materials can be introduced or exact standards can be made. These may cost far less than building new ones and also can benefit more people because the same problems are faced nationally. To balance between the requirements from the downtown and the suburban areas asks for the efforts from many sectors and aspects, technologies, management and laws. Maybe some of us wil contribute to that. ![]() [ Last edited by tuqin2575 on 2012-9-21 at 13:46 ] |

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
111

鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
金蟲 (正式寫手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑求院校招收 +6 | 鶴鯨鴿 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085600 材料與化工 329分求調(diào)劑 +11 | Mr. Z 2026-03-25 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研]
|
nnnnnnn5 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +4 | wei-5 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華北電力大學(xué)能動(dòng)專碩,293,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 15537177284 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +7 | A child 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
|
18419759900 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 08開頭275求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拉誰(shuí)不重要 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 298調(diào)劑 +3 | jiyingjie123 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | question挽風(fēng) 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大085600,310分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 李瀟可 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[論文投稿] Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology +3 | Russ_ss 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 336材料求調(diào)劑 +7 | 陳瀅瑩 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研]
材料調(diào)劑
5+4
|
想要一壺桃花水 2026-03-25 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 081700 調(diào)劑 267分 +11 | 迷人的哈哈 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +6 | 藍(lán)山月 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求b區(qū)院校調(diào)劑 +4 | 周56 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +4 | 錦衣衛(wèi)藤椒 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博自薦 +3 | whh869393 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | ALULU4408 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|