| 13 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1181 | 回復(fù): 12 | |||
[交流]
審稿人反饋的意見求助
|
|||
|
Question 6: Why was the pH for the Cd solution 5.5, while it was 4.5 for Zn and Cu. It would be more systematic, and easier to determine a metal ion influence on structure, if this were kept the same (say 5.5) for all three cases instead of changing. It makes it harder to determine if the changes are due to changing metal ion or due to the difference in pH.不知道怎么回答,更不知道怎么補充信息。 Question 8: The luminescence section needs further discussion. Why does [1] have two emission bands like the ligand, but [2] and [3] do not? Could the presence of ox ligand be having an effect? Could it be topological in nature, i.e. ligand-ligand interactions, quenching, etc.? Further effort to explain the observed luminescence properties of these materials is warranted.這個問題特別苛刻,不知道如何回答? Question 1:The incorporation of oxalates in the framework of compound 2 and not in compound 1, is explained by the elevation of the pH value from 5.5 for 1 to 7.5 for 2. However, at both pH values, the oxalate should be completely deprotonated (pK values are approximately 1.2 and 4.3). Also, if the pH is the only parameter, compounds 3 and 4 formed at pH=4.5 should not incorporate the oxalate anions in the framework. I recommend measurement of the pH of the reaction mixture after stirring for 30 min and at the end of the hydrothermal reaction, before considering the role of the pH.這個問題同樣如此不知道怎么回答。 Question 2: The nitrogen adsorption isotherm should be completed to reach the saturation plateau and the value of specific area should be determined. The effective free volume alone, calculated with PLATON, is not very informative.這個問題也是一樣難回答。 Question 4: What are the possible reasons for the absence of a luminescence peak around 400 nm in compounds 2 and 3? 以上問題很難回答。求助。。。。!萬分感謝。 |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+1/190
+1/90
+1/85
+2/76
+2/52
+1/42
+1/36
+1/34
+1/19
+1/15
+1/12
+1/11
+1/6
+1/6
+1/6
+1/4
+1/4
+1/4
+1/1
+1/1
|
我也剛完成了一個回復(fù)信,其中一個審稿人提了18個問題,有些問題也是如LZ列出的一般不是很好回答。 我的建議是,如果LZ投的是很好的期刊,那么審稿人的每個問題都要非常認(rèn)真的回答,甚至不惜惡補實驗結(jié)果;回答時倘若要陳述自己觀點,盡量多的引用文獻和實驗結(jié)果;盡量不要說目前沒法驗證之類的話,除非審稿人的問題確實遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過了目前的工作范疇。 如果是一般的期刊,挑2-3個重點問題重點回答,這樣至少讓審稿人看到你確實按照他的意見修改了并且付出了很大的努力。 LZ列的幾個問題,雖然不明白,但是建議分別從以下角度回答: Q6,要么補實驗;要么引用文獻說明PH值對結(jié)果影響不大; Q8,審稿人說這些問題需要further discussion,最簡單的方法就是按照他的意思,查閱相關(guān)文獻,補充一小段討論,把審稿人的那些意見也表述出來就行,文中說明這些觀點是作為數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)果分析的一個可能性提出來的; Q1,我只能說,按照審稿人的意見去補實驗,看上去似乎是實驗設(shè)計上的缺陷導(dǎo)致的結(jié)果分析不明確; Q2,不是很明白; Q4,查閱文獻,補充討論。 |


| 13 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 各位老師好,我的一志愿為北京科技大學(xué)085601材料專碩 +12 | Koxui 2026-03-28 | 12/600 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0805求調(diào)劑 +5 | 是水分 2026-03-31 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調(diào)劑 一志愿070303有機化學(xué) +11 | 蘿卜燉青菜 2026-03-28 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +6 | Faune 2026-03-30 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 生物考研337分求調(diào)劑 +4 | cgxin 2026-03-30 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué) +20 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-27 | 20/1000 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩,總分289分 +9 | @taotao 2026-03-29 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +7 | DLkz1314. 2026-03-30 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)321分求調(diào)劑 +10 | 三dd. 2026-03-30 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿9,初試成績:338,四六級已過,有科研經(jīng)歷,求調(diào)劑! +7 | Zuhui0306 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理 材料求調(diào)劑 +16 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-26 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 085701求調(diào)劑初試286分 +5 | secret0328 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | Lyy930824@ 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +4 | 邱gl 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 2026年華南師范大學(xué)歡迎化學(xué),化工,生物,生醫(yī)工等專業(yè)優(yōu)秀學(xué)子加入! +3 | llss0711 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +3 | A child 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +3 | raojunqi0129 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211院校 344分 東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)生物學(xué)學(xué)碩,求調(diào)劑 +5 | 丶風(fēng)雪夜歸人丶 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海理工能源動力(085800)310分求調(diào)劑 +3 | zhangmingc 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑 +7 | 青檸檬1 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|