 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3926 | 回復: 26 | ||||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||
laodai00鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
Applied Optics 大修后被拒,該如何是好，請各位蟲友指教 已有9人參與
|
|||
|
初審兩個審稿人，一個同意發(fā)表，一個不同意，編輯給的大修，修改完編輯又返回給那個不同意發(fā)表的審稿人，一個月后被拒，意見如下： Dear Sir ***: Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics. If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future. Sincerely, **** ****, Topical Editor, APPLIED OPTICS ---------------------------- Reviewer comments provided here: Reviewer 1 After reading thru the authors responding letter, I was not convinced by the authors’ arguments. The major problem was focused on the linear Interpolation estimation of the unknowns that the authors proposed for wavefront estimation of large amount of shearing. It is true that for 2-D wavefront estimation, if wavefront resolution is based on the shear amount, the spatial resolution can be low for the large shears. And if you want to obtain a high spatial resolution estimation, you have to take more measurements. This is the price we should pay at present for high resolution estimation. Compare to the small shear (such as one pixel shear), wavefront estimation based on large shear (more than one pixel) with proposed method does have an advantage of high resolution in wavefront estimation as the small shear, except for linear interpolation approach for the wavefront unknowns, which is not acceptable. If the interpolation could be used for estimating the unknown values, why the authors do not use the linear interpolation of wavefront slope? At least it is more accurate and more reasonable than the linear interpolation of the unknown wavefront. It is also true that for the large shear the signal to noise ratio could be higher, but we are not clear how the authors would treat the 2pi(or one pi) phase ambiguity for the large shear scenario, which can be a big problem. For the finite difference based wavefront estimation, it is approximate method even if the authors think it is “ exactly accurate in principle”. It is generally not acceptable in the field of wavefront metrology if a method is principally incorrect even if the induced error is only 1-5% for some specific simulation examples. Of course, you can still use it as your own purpose, but it is not proper to publish to mislead the academia. 各位怎么看？重投還是改投？ |
回復此樓» 收錄本帖的淘帖專輯推薦
 找工作 |
» 猜你喜歡
299求調劑
已經有8人回復
-
一志愿北京理工大學本科211材料工程294求調劑
已經有6人回復
-
300求調劑，材料科學英一數二
已經有8人回復
-
招收生物學/細胞生物學調劑
已經有5人回復
-
070305高分子化學與物理 304分求調劑
已經有7人回復
-
289求調劑
已經有13人回復
-
一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學材料與化工方向336分
已經有9人回復
-
081200-11408-276學碩求調劑
已經有6人回復
-
調劑求院校招收
已經有5人回復
-
調劑310
已經有8人回復
» 本主題相關價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 投APPLIED OPTICS被拒了，按照修改意見修改后，是否可以再投回去？
已經有9人回復
- 投Applied Optics返回審稿意見，懇請各位看看給點意見
已經有11人回復
- 關于投往Applied Optics期刊中通信作者的問題
已經有8人回復
- Optics Express被拒后改后投Applied optics？
已經有9人回復
- 請教Applied optics的Manuscript Accepted with Mandatory Revisions是個什么狀態(tài)？
已經有15人回復
- Applied Optics 模板求助
已經有3人回復
- Applied Optics 怎么這么慢��？
已經有17人回復
- 投Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics，這樣的拒稿意見是否冤枉？
已經有11人回復
- applied optics 投稿求助
已經有14人回復
- 一個月前投了篇到《Applied Optics》，但目前審稿狀態(tài)看不懂
已經有18人回復
- 求助：Cr2O3 能被氫氣還原嗎？請各位蟲友指教啊。謝謝
已經有3人回復
- Optical engineering 和 Applied optics 哪個更容易中？
已經有22人回復
- 誰經歷過Applied Optics審稿過程中的Other？
已經有7人回復
- applied optics 怎樣投稿？
已經有4人回復
- applied optics接受后的proof
已經有5人回復
- 請各位蟲友指教：關于GPA的算法？
已經有3人回復
laodai00
鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應助: 9 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 634.3
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 186
- 在線: 513.2小時
- 蟲號: 1563873
- 注冊: 2012-01-04
- 專業(yè): 光學
9樓2012-12-12 23:06:47
laodai00
鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應助: 9 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 634.3
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 186
- 在線: 513.2小時
- 蟲號: 1563873
- 注冊: 2012-01-04
- 專業(yè): 光學
3樓2012-12-12 10:49:55
hustoe2011
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
- 應助: 178 (高中生)
- 金幣: 22855.1
- 散金: 9962
- 紅花: 47
- 帖子: 22053
- 在線: 4425.9小時
- 蟲號: 1333598
- 注冊: 2011-06-29
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 光學和光電子材料
4樓2012-12-12 13:14:17
laodai00
鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應助: 9 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 634.3
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 186
- 在線: 513.2小時
- 蟲號: 1563873
- 注冊: 2012-01-04
- 專業(yè): 光學
5樓2012-12-12 13:33:46
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 299求調劑 +8 | 15188958825 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 初試270分 求調劑 +8 | 谷雨上岸 2026-03-23 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300化學354求調劑 +3 | 101次希望 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿太原理工安全工程300分，求調劑 +5 | 0857求調劑. 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 生物學學碩，一志愿湖南大學，初試成績338 +6 | YYYYYNNNNN 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 295材料工程專碩求調劑 +7 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 321求調劑 +6 | 璞玉~~ 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 化學0703 調劑 306分 一志愿211 +4 | 26要上岸 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學 +10 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料求調劑一志愿哈工大324 +7 | 閆旭東 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學 070300 學碩 336分 求調劑 +9 | vv迷 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600，材料與化工321分調劑 +4 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿陜師大生物學071000，298分，求調劑 +5 | SYA！ 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 341求調劑 +7 | 青檸檬1 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 333求調劑 +6 | wfh030413@ 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學339材料與化工求調劑 +3 | 江往賣魚 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海交大生物與醫(yī)藥專碩324分，求調劑 +6 | jiajunX 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調劑 +6 | 032500 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調劑 +3 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化315 求調劑 +3 | akrrain 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|