 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 查看: 3814 | 回復(fù): 21 | |||||
zeng3794銀蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
審稿四個(gè)月,今天出結(jié)果了,悲劇了,嗚嗚嗚 已有20人參與
|
||||
|
我的心哇哇的,審稿意見如下: Ms. Ref. No.: ****** Title: *********************************** Nursing Outlook Dear ******, I recently received back the reviewers' comments about your manuscript. The reviewers believe this is an interesting paper that addresses an important topic consistent with the editorial purpose of NO. However, based on the reviewers' comments (see attached), I regret I must reject the paper for publication in Nursing Outlook. I am attaching a copy of the reviews. If you choose to revise the manuscript and resubmit elsewhere you may find their suggestions helpful. We thank you for considering Nursing Outlook for dissemination of your work. Sincerely, Marion E. Broome, PhD, RN, FAAN Editor-in-Chief Nursing Outlook Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The authors address the topic of interdisciplinarity of nursing journals which is potentially of interest to nurse researchers,particularly those who consider themselves to direct interdisciplinary programs of research. However, given the poor quality of English, it is difficult to ascertain the quality of the research presented including the methods applied and the interpretation of the results. Moreover, it is not clear why the findings are important to researchers, clinicians, educators, or policy makers. Reviewer #2: Overall, this paper was interesting but there are some issues with the methodology that need to be addressed and there are many sentences throughout the paper that need to be rewritten. This manuscript was difficult to read at times as many sentences often lacked a flow. Many times the wrong tense or an incorrect version of the word was used - e.g promotion instead of promoting. Example sentences "And we can know about a common cognition of the expect for promotion ability and status of interdisciplinary research in nursing from them. Researchers have been focusing on the strategy to the goal." Sometimes the author was a little too direct in conjecture statements - e.g. "However, nursing is in an embarrassment status in interdisciplinary research." (bottom of pg 2) Lit Review - page 4 - "One of indicators in our study was similar to theirs (Percentage of Multi-Assignation), but a revised one, which considered more impact of the number of multi-assigned journals. Our study also assumed that multi-assigned journals were more interdisciplinary than single-assigned ones as they did." These statements belong in the methodology, not the lit review. The methodology of this study does seem logical. Given that previous research has employed a similar methodology to the one used by this study to demonstrate the validity of using the subjects assigned to JCR journals to determine interdisciplinarity, using it again for another discipline makes sense. However, JCR is known to not be very inclusive of nursing journals (although it is improving). I wonder if this is a relevant issue and something the authors should mention in limitations of the study -- assuming its possible that the limited inclusion of nursing journals in JCR may impact the results of this study. One issue that needs to be addressed in the methodology is why the social science version was not used in this study, particularly since the Science version of JCR did not include Nursing from 1998 to 2001. The author only briefly acknowledges the existence of the social science edition of journal citation reports and it should be noted that the SocSciEd. includes nursing journals in all years from 1997 to the present. The social science version of JCR includes at least 41 journals from 1997 to 2001. In 2002, the social science version of JCR goes down to 33, suggesting that some journals from this list went to the Science JCR list. It would be curious to know what the outcome of this study would be if the nursing journals from both the social science JCR version and the science JCR version were included. |
回復(fù)此樓» 收錄本帖的淘帖專輯推薦
 SCI寫作、投稿、經(jīng)驗(yàn) | 論文評(píng)價(jià) |
» 本帖已獲得的紅花（最新10朵）
wangqimaster» 猜你喜歡
08工學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
350求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑一志愿武漢理工大學(xué)材料工程（085601）
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
一志愿重慶大學(xué)085700資源與環(huán)境，總分308求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
接收2026碩士調(diào)劑(學(xué)碩+專碩)
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
081700 調(diào)劑 267分
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
328求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
0854 考研調(diào)劑 招生了！AI 方向
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
招08考數(shù)學(xué)
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
一志愿上海交大生物與醫(yī)藥專碩324分，求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 嗚嗚嗚，考博貌似犯了大忌，悲劇了，怎么辦，求助。還有導(dǎo)師的信，想不想要我呢？
已經(jīng)有24人回復(fù)
- 文章悲劇了 嗚嗚嗚嗚
已經(jīng)有28人回復(fù)
3樓2013-01-16 11:55:00
qhd511
鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 324 (大學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 6915.3
- 散金: 226
- 紅花: 12
- 帖子: 1922
- 在線: 390.1小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1079710
- 注冊(cè): 2010-08-22
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 環(huán)境分析化學(xué)
4樓2013-01-16 11:58:32
ldy85367996
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 10 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 4035.6
- 帖子: 3032
- 在線: 247.9小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1829437
- 注冊(cè): 2012-05-22
- 性別: MM
- 專業(yè): 有機(jī)合成
6樓2013-01-16 13:23:39
minierr
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 4 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1218.6
- 紅花: 12
- 帖子: 437
- 在線: 36.7小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1994757
- 注冊(cè): 2012-09-12
- 性別: MM
- 專業(yè): 理論和計(jì)算化學(xué)
7樓2013-01-16 14:14:33
paperhunter
榮譽(yù)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
還沒想好
-
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +14 - SEPI: 1
- 應(yīng)助: 14603 (教授)
- 貴賓: 11.659
- 金幣: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 紅花: 1423
- 沙發(fā): 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在線: 8880.4小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 971012
- 注冊(cè): 2010-03-14
- 專業(yè): 環(huán)境工程
- 管轄: 論文投稿
8樓2013-01-16 14:34:23
hongliu2006
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 2 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 221.1
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 69
- 在線: 46.9小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1115620
- 注冊(cè): 2010-10-07
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 機(jī)械動(dòng)力學(xué)
2樓2013-01-16 11:53:34
daysfoot
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 53 (初中生)
- 金幣: 4609.6
- 散金: 1000
- 紅花: 9
- 帖子: 4657
- 在線: 792.7小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 564759
- 注冊(cè): 2008-05-28
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 計(jì)算機(jī)科學(xué)
5樓2013-01-16 12:03:17
zeng3794
銀蟲 (初入文壇)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 232.3
- 帖子: 45
- 在線: 28.9小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 934560
- 注冊(cè): 2009-12-28
- 專業(yè): 流行病學(xué)方法與衛(wèi)生統(tǒng)計(jì)
9樓2013-01-16 17:54:17
10樓2013-01-16 18:43:24
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 zeng3794 的主題更新
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 324 +3 | Promise-jyl 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +9 | chuanzhu川燭 2026-03-18 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 263求調(diào)劑 +6 | yqdszhdap－ 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +5 | 苑豆豆 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工 +10 | 安全上岸！ 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 293求調(diào)劑 +3 | 濤濤Wjt 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué)070300 學(xué)碩336求調(diào)劑 +5 | vv迷 2026-03-21 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 山東省面上項(xiàng)目限額評(píng)審 +4 | 石瑞0426 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +10 | Faune 2026-03-21 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 286分人工智能專業(yè)請(qǐng)求調(diào)劑愿意跨考！ +4 | lemonzzn 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 280求調(diào)劑 +11 | 咕嚕曉曉 2026-03-18 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 要好好無聊 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0805 316求調(diào)劑 +3 | 大雪深藏 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +9 | 煙火先于春 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +5 | shxchem 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +5 | 紅衣隱官 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 機(jī)械專碩299求調(diào)劑至材料 +3 | kkcoco25 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 二本跨考鄭大材料306英一數(shù)二 +3 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中海洋材料工程專碩330分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0817 化學(xué)工程 299分求調(diào)劑 有科研經(jīng)歷 有二區(qū)文章 +22 | rare12345 2026-03-18 | 22/1100 |
|