| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2678 | 回復(fù): 5 | |||
xdliang_mudt木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
[交流]
GRSL從Major Revision到Reject and Resubmit,悲劇! 已有3人參與
|
|
2012年12月份投了一篇GRSL,一個(gè)月后返回意見(jiàn),如下: Your manuscript **** has been reviewed by the GRSL Editorial Review Board and found to be not acceptable without major revisions. It is recommended that you revise your paper and resubmit it in accordance with the Editorial Review Board comments given below. Reviewer(s) Comments: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author No comments. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author In attachment, authors may find some minor issues that should be addressed. Below, some additional issues: 1 - The proposed method was set a maximum number of iterations of 15. Why? I understand that the more iterations are employed, the more time/computation is required. However, why exactly 15? I think it would be beneficial for the work a more quantitative analysis of this threshold value. For instance, for varying number of iterations, quantify the computation time and argue on the choice of the iterations based on the desired computation time; 2 - In the PDF file, the region boundaries are in red. But when printed in B&W (as in most printers) information is mostly lost. I suggest to use pure white (255) instead of red; 3 - The curves in the plots require no color. Please use patterns and make them black for ease of reading; 4 - I recommend removing "Novel" from the title. Not because the proposal is not new, but because it surely must be new in other to be published. So "novel" is redundant. 5 - Authors furnish an example using a particular image. Particular images seldom are representative of a possible more general behavior. Why not considering a set of images and analyzing the mean results? 這些都是小問(wèn)題,當(dāng)時(shí)覺(jué)得這篇文章沒(méi)什么問(wèn)題了,結(jié)果就沒(méi)重視,三兩下就改完了,過(guò)兩天就提交了修改稿,結(jié)果悲劇了,三周后給了我Reject and Resubmit Your paper **** has been carefully reviewed by the GRSL review panel and found to be unacceptable in its present form. The reviewers did suggest, however, that if completely revised the paper might be found acceptable. We encourage you to revise and resubmit this manuscript as a new paper to GRSL. Associate Editor Comments: Associate Editor Comments to the Author: Dear Authors: based on the recommendations, I regret to inform you that your paper is not suitable for publication in GRSL. Reviewer(s) Comments: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author A minor correction. Page 3, col. 2, line 38. "shoule" should be corrected as "should". Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author Authors have addressed most of the points I have raised, but not all of them. - Again, I ask to avoid colors. (Fig 1 and Fig 7). Fig 7(b) green areas can be easily set to full white. Colored areas in Fig 7(c) could use a gray-scale palette; - Sentences are still beginning with symbols, which is a bad practice (e.g. page 7 of 10, line 53); - The discussion about the number of iteration and the threshold value E is not clear. Why 10^(-5)? Also, I couldn't spot in the manuscript any discussion on this point; - The expression "error converges" is very mathematically loose. Convergence in what sense? Convergence to what? Authors seem to be only regarding the magnitude of the error, which may well be OK. But as it is stated it is a bit confusing; - Regarding Fig 1, authors provide a long explanation in the rebuttal letter, but in the paper it is extremely concise. I think it could be better explained in the paper. - Punctuation in equations is often incorrect. See (2), (3), (4). Should use commas, not periods. - Grammar is still improperly used. See page 7 of 10, column 2, line 51 (Sentence starts with lowercase "then". 看了這封郵件頓時(shí)心涼了半截啊,是我心存僥幸不好好修改文章導(dǎo)致的嗎?如果我認(rèn)真修改后這篇文章還有希望嗎?苦逼的我連年都過(guò)的不爽了啊 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

木蟲(chóng)之王 (文學(xué)泰斗)
木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)

木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)

木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)

金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +8 | 碩星赴 2026-03-23 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué)材料與化工 264分各科過(guò)A區(qū)國(guó)家線 +3 | 哈哈157349 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 081700 調(diào)劑 267分 +9 | 迷人的哈哈 2026-03-23 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博自薦 +3 | whh869393 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 361求調(diào)劑 +3 | Glack 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 接收2026碩士調(diào)劑(學(xué)碩+專碩) +4 | allen-yin 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研]
|
2117205181 2026-03-21 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工(0856)304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 336求調(diào)劑 +5 | rmc8866 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +5 | shxchem 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | Mqqqqqq 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中海洋材料工程專碩330分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +9 | 想上學(xué)吖吖 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩297已過(guò)四六級(jí)求調(diào)劑推薦 +11 | adaie 2026-03-19 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 261求B區(qū)調(diào)劑,科研經(jīng)歷豐富 +3 | 牛奶很忙 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 招收調(diào)劑碩士 +4 | lidianxing 2026-03-19 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 18889395102 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研調(diào)劑 +3 | xwt。 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 本科鄭州大學(xué)物理學(xué)院,一志愿華科070200學(xué)碩,346求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我不是一根蔥 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|