 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5816 | 回復(fù): 27 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
BJTerry新蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
論文返修后被拒，求幫忙看看拒信 已有16人參與
|
||
|
論文投稿比較波折，時(shí)間至今已有半年了。文章負(fù)責(zé)人是副主編（在美國的華人），一審意見沖突，副主編要求增加審稿人審稿，增加后一審?fù)ㄟ^，但需要修改 本月3號提交的修改稿，昨天收到主編（印度人，不清楚為什么他來負(fù)責(zé)我的文章了）的被拒郵件。被拒所附的審稿內(nèi)容居然和修改給的審稿意見一樣，沒有清楚寫明被拒理由，我不知道是不是其中出現(xiàn)了什么問題，特附拒信，麻煩大家?guī)臀铱纯矗遣皇蔷庉嬜约鹤龀龅臎Q定拒搞了，謝謝。 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dear author(s) Ref: Submission "*****" Your above mentioned submitted article has been read through several rounds of peer review. Unfortunately, the recommendation is that the article be rejected. We have come to the conclusion after a careful evaluation of your work. Articles submitted to the International Journal of *** are judged on their timeliness and novelty; significance to the field and potential impact on the course of future work in the area. I would not advise you to revise the article in anything like its present form. I am enclosing part of the referee's reports. However, I do thank you for your interest in the International Journal of ***. Best Wishes, ------------------------------------- COMMENTS MADE BY REFEREES: ------------------------- First Review: ------------- The experiments conducted are based on only synthetic datasets - this might not be convincing enough to claim the superiority of the algorithm. Data from the real world (possibly multidimensional data) are recommended. Second Review: ------------- No One major concern is the experimental settings, which should be depicted more detailed. Since the fault matrix A is generated randomly, the results are untrusted unless they are averaged by many runs. Similarly, since evolutionary algorithms are randomized algorithms in nature, i.e., their results may be unaccepted sometimes, the author(s) should state clearly whether the results is attained by one run or best of many runs, i.e., how much the variance of results is. Another concern is that the paper fails to describe the IGA in detail. In line 5 of Algorithm 1, how the V is computed by matrix A? Since there are some techniques for crossover and mutation, what technique does the IGA use for crossover and mutation and why? In the abstract, the authors said appropriate termination criterion can improve the accuracy and efficiency of the algorithm, but they did not point out it clearly in this paper. The third concern is the feasibility of two vaccines V_1 and V_2. Since LB is the lower bound of the solution and the author(s) did not prove LB is the tight lower bound, it may be not helpful or good to make the individual consisting of LB '1' in some cases. So the authors need to deal with this problem in order to make the paper more rigorous logically. The grammar is generally acceptable, but more attention needs to be paid to raise the quality of polish. And there are some statements that need citations. For example, 'It has been proven that the minimal hitting set problem is NP-hard', 'Numerous studies show that it is far from enough for relying solely on evolutionary algorithm (such as genetic algorithm) to simulate human intelligence to deal with things' and so on. I think the sentence below the equation (2) maybe wrong. If not, why the author(s) give a different definition of 2-norm of vectors? |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
一志愿河北工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工278分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
化學(xué)308分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
085600材料與化工調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
335分 | 材料與化工專碩 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經(jīng)歷
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿武理材料工程348求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
279分求調(diào)劑 一志愿211
已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
材料292調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿陜師大生物學(xué)071000，298分，求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
306求0703調(diào)劑一志愿華中師范
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 請問這份拒稿信說的是什么意思
已經(jīng)有33人回復(fù)
- 【被拒的體無完膚】求推薦通信管理、博弈方面比較好中的EI或者SCI期刊
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 語言問題被拒兩次投稿信怎么寫
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- 投了一篇JPBA，三個(gè)月給拒了，編輯的拒信
已經(jīng)有43人回復(fù)
- 請科研戰(zhàn)績的朋友們幫忙分析一下：返修的SCI論文，如果改數(shù)據(jù)會造成拒稿嗎？
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 納米合成的文章，論文二審被拒，大家?guī)兔ν扑]個(gè)雜志吧
已經(jīng)有29人回復(fù)
- 文章被拒，但想寫申訴信，如何寫？
已經(jīng)有21人回復(fù)
- 被拒了，想申訴呢，大家?guī)兔纯淳芨逍�，還有沒有可能？
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 文章被拒了，麻煩各位高手進(jìn)來幫忙分析下拒絕意見。謝謝
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- 拒稿信還需要回復(fù)嗎？
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 文章被拒，求助被拒信中一段話的意思
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- 大家?guī)兔聪逻@封拒稿信是什么意思，還能繼續(xù)投這個(gè)期刊嗎？先謝謝各位了。
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- 看完拒稿信后的心情
已經(jīng)有37人回復(fù)
- 收到的最快的拒稿信！
已經(jīng)有38人回復(fù)
- 論文返修求助
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 文章被拒，請大家?guī)臀铱纯淳芨逍�，我�?yīng)該怎么辦？
已經(jīng)有31人回復(fù)
- 稿件被拒，打算回信力爭
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
nono2009
超級版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 應(yīng)助: 28684 (院士)
- 貴賓: 513.911
- 金幣: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 紅花: 2148
- 沙發(fā): 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在線: 65200.9小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 827383
- 注冊: 2009-08-13
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 工程熱物理與能源利用
- 管轄: 科研家籌備委員會
3樓2013-02-08 20:54:53
nuaawq
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 2144 (講師)
- 金幣: 30760.1
- 散金: 42
- 紅花: 17
- 帖子: 8067
- 在線: 582.5小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 1391607
- 注冊: 2011-09-05
- 專業(yè): 金屬功能材料
2樓2013-02-08 19:28:26
BJTerry
新蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 10 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1578.2
- 散金: 683
- 紅花: 5
- 帖子: 224
- 在線: 352.4小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 1804539
- 注冊: 2012-05-08
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 人工智能與知識工程
4樓2013-02-08 23:25:09
BJTerry
新蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 10 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1578.2
- 散金: 683
- 紅花: 5
- 帖子: 224
- 在線: 352.4小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 1804539
- 注冊: 2012-05-08
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 人工智能與知識工程
5樓2013-02-08 23:25:43
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
