Dear Dr. ###,
On February 8, 2013 I accepted your revised manuscript ****** for publication in AAAAA based on a set of reviews.
I have since then become aware of other recent publications on a closely related subject, namely BBBBB (2011) and CCCCC (2012), neither of them referenced in your submission.
After examining these publications and comparing them with your manuscript, after consulting with one of our Reviewers with expertise in the field, I have concluded that the results presented in your manuscript are incremental.
On this basis, taking into account AAAAA scopes and policies with reference to originality and importance, I regret that I have to reverse my decision and reject your manuscript for publication in AAAAA.
Sincerely,
文章本來已經(jīng)接收了，今天早上收到郵件又被拒了。BBBBB (2011) 和 CCCCC (2012)是我以前發(fā)表的文章，實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果圖和本篇文章有些類似，但是實(shí)驗(yàn)方法和裝置完全不同，就沒有引用這兩個(gè)文獻(xiàn)。這需要再和編輯解釋一下嗎？會(huì)不會(huì)因此被列入黑名單啊？
  |
回復(fù)此樓
祝好運(yùn) 
一志愿東華大學(xué)控制學(xué)碩320求調(diào)劑
+3
10+3