| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3427 | 回復(fù): 10 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
投了一篇ACS Catal,審稿意見(jiàn)如下,修改后重投有希望嗎
|
|||
|
Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in ACS Catalysis. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in ACS Catalysis. However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that included such data and analysis, assuming no related data is published in the interim. We ask that you submit your revision by 01-Jun. This revision should address the reviewers’ comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns. Please either highlight, color font, or underline the actual changes made to the manuscript. |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+1/461
+1/461
+2/408
+1/93
+1/73
+1/57
+1/40
+1/36
+1/16
+1/15
+1/15
+1/8
+1/7
+1/6
+1/6
+1/4
+1/2
+1/2
+1/2
+1/1
木蟲(chóng) (知名作家)
|
Not all the resubmitted manuscript will go to the original reviewers, if new reviewers review the paper, they might have some new comments. In this case, it is hard to say 100% of acceptance. Resubmitted manuscript it is a new submission. |
鐵蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
樓上說(shuō)的太武斷了吧 我看了一遍全文,沒(méi)見(jiàn)到編輯拒搞呀,寫的是讓你大修major revision,具體還得看看審稿人意見(jiàn),如果沒(méi)那么苛刻,最好就point-by-point response,給你的修改時(shí)間是3個(gè)月,截止到01-Jun 這段文字感覺(jué)是這個(gè)期刊的大修的套話 我覺(jué)得既然都花了那么長(zhǎng)時(shí)間投稿+審稿,還沒(méi)直接拒,還是好好修改一下吧,比重投中獎(jiǎng)幾率大 祝好運(yùn) |
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫手)
至尊木蟲(chóng) (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|